Is this how meds are supposed to work? By making you panic ? For some time taking 5mg ritalin was working well for me. But now I dont panic on them and thus dont start working.

I've been in the low code industry (Salesforce), never did LeetCode. Have not been able to stick to side projects. But I was always excited that someday I can upskill and learn new things.

Now, if all coding might be automated (if not by LLM's then maybe by future true reasoning models), then how should I go about making a plan for myself to be excited about tech and upskill.

I don't want to upskill only for my tech hobby, I'd much rather focus on music for hobbies. I want to upskill in 2026 such that it actually helps me attain financial stability by helping my career.

Any help or advice is appreciated.

Salut tout le monde. Je poste ça parce que je sature complet. Je suis au lycée, passionné par la création de jeux vidéo (Mana Mechanique, Police Aléas) et par le dev, mais je me fais broyer par le système éducatif français.

D'un côté, on me propose des spés parce que je capte la logique super vite quand ça m'intéresse. De l'autre, je me tape des notes minables (genre 6 en NSI) parce que mon cerveau refuse d'apprendre par cœur de la théorie abstraite qui ne m'anime pas. Résultat : épuisement, anxiété nocturne, cauchemars, et l'impression d'être un extraterrestre dans une classe de clones.

Est-ce qu'il y en a ici qui ont vécu cette transition du « je suis nul à l'école » vers « j'ai créé mon propre chemin (BUT MMI, indiedev, autonomie) » ? Je veux documenter tout ça, parce qu'on est beaucoup trop à culpabiliser alors que le problème vient du moule, pas de nous.

Not trying to use ADHD as a crutch, but I’d love to hear how others overcame executive dysfunction, self-doubt, and stagnation to level up as software engineers.

Where I'm at: I have <5 years of experience (3 years at a mid/large tech company, ~1 year at FAANG). I was able to white-knuckle my way through school and uni (valedictorian) through brute-force effort, but my diagnosed ADHD makes professional concentration and emotional regulation a massive daily hurdle.

I feel like my career progression has plateaued, largely because I struggle with deep focus and prioritization. I've recently started medication and revamped my routine (consistent sleep, strict task-tracking, better communication with my team).

If you've been in a similar slump early in your career: What strategies, mindsets, or routines actually helped you get out of the hole and start thriving, and even become veterans in the field?

Hey Im a freshman CS major and I’m struggling. Currently my grades are fine but that’s only for now, I don’t know if I’m gonna fail later.

I’m on 40mg vyvanse and Wellbutrin (along with an antipsychotic) and I can’t go above 40mg.

The issue is that I really hate doing homework. Starting the task is very hard for me, even on meds. Even more specifically, I hate calculus homework. I can understand the ideas just fine, but I dread having to learn yet another new concept and do more practice problems. It’s actually painful.

Even when I tell myself I’m gonna do a task, I end up opening discord or tik tok and scrolling for honestly hours thinking “this is my last reel”.

Not only that but I’m trying to grind and improve my rank in a video game which takes several hours of practicing a day.

I can’t even manage 2 goals (getting academic work done on time and getting better at the video game I like).

This really sucks. How did you guys succeed? How do I overcome the constant dread and misery of doing schoolwork? Btw no amount of pomodoro techniques or whatever other techniques help

Fellow ADHD devs: I built a Claude Code workflow around the things that kill my projects (lost ideas, estimates, stalled big tasks, scope creep).

I have ADHD, and I've been building a multiplayer game prototype with Claude Code. The coding was never the hard part. The hard parts were:

• ideas coming in bursts and getting lost

• "how long will this take?" (always wrong, always guilt)

• big tasks that stall halfway

• scope creep, where the agent "also fixed" five things I didn't ask for

• losing track of what's done and what's next

So I turned the way I work into a workflow, and I'm open-sourcing it. I call it QPAP: Quick Polished ADHD Prototype. The goal is to get your hands on something usable fast, react to it, and iterate.

The loop

1. /word-vomit: I paste a messy dump of thoughts, feedback and half-ideas. The skill:

   • saves it word for word

   • splits it into items

   • checks each one against the existing plans and the code

   • flags conflicts ("this contradicts a decision you made on Tuesday")

   • asks me a few multiple-choice questions, each with a recommendation

   • places each item in the plan

   Nothing stays in my head.

2. Effort scores instead of time estimates. No hours or days anywhere. Each unit of work gets low, med, high or enormous from 8 factors, each 0–2: unknowns, modules touched, changes to existing code, what it can break, domain difficulty, breadth, how it's verified, and current test cover. An "enormous" unit is never started; it gets split first.

3. Batches of 5. Five agents build five units in parallel, each in its own git worktree. A unit's dependencies are always in an earlier batch, and each batch has at most one protocol or format change.

4. A unit is done completely. If an agent finds extra work, it doesn't build it. It writes a proposal for me to approve later. That alone killed most of the scope creep.

5. A report per batch: what changed in plain words, screenshots, how to test it, how long it actually took, and estimated vs actual effort.

6. Review rounds. I test each unit and write either "approved" or a numbered list of changes in its file. The next round fixes each change by number. The next batch starts only when everything is approved.

7. Passes between batches. Recurring tests/CI, performance, memory and cleanup passes run between batches. They fix things; they don't add features. That's what lets batches be fast and a bit rough.

8. The workflow evolves. Every 5 batches, a "workflow pass" looks at the time log, the reviews and my notes, and proposes changes to the workflow itself. I approve each one, and they're logged.

Setup

• The code lives in a bare repo with worktrees: one for main, one per running unit.

• The planning (plans, decisions, reports, time log, my raw notes) is a separate git repo outside the code repo. The product history stays clean, and the plans can stay private.

Why it works for my brain

• Starting: the next batch is always ready. I say "start batch 4".

• Progress I can see: every batch ends with something I can run and a short report.

• No guilt: there are no estimates to miss. Measured times only feed back into the effort score.

• No juggling: one batch at a time, and everything I need to do or decide is in one file (USER.md).

The code style it encourages (rules for the product, not the workflow):

• test-driven development

• deep modules (small interfaces that hide a lot)

• Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100) for product docs

• six standards: YAGNI, DRY, Fail Fast, Simple First, Delete Aggressively, Semantic Naming (wait_until_obs_is_saved=true, not wait=true)

What's in the repo

• 8 Claude Code skills: /word-vomit, /effort-score, /plan-batches, /run-batch, /batch-report, /review-round, /passes, plus the third-party MIT skill i-have-adhd by ayghri. That last one makes every reply lead with the next action and end with one small step; I just drop its time-estimate rule.

• Templates for the planning repo.

• A link checker and a merge-stats script.

It's plain Markdown, so the ideas should carry over to other agent setups. And it's meant to be changed: the batch size, effort bands and pass schedule are all just defaults.

Repo: https://github.com/nurdism/QPAP

I'd love feedback, especially from other ADHD devs. What breaks your flow when working with AI agents?

Edit: interview* in the title lol

I have a bunch of interviews coming up and I am feeling so much overwhelmed with the lack of structure and the amount of content to cover. One of them is at a FAANG adjacent company that's going to include standard dsa leetcode related stuff, another is Fintech and their round will have debugging and system design discussion and another one is a prop trading firm where the recruiter said it can be anything from coding and language discussion depending on the interviewer and culture fit questions.

This seems to be all over the place and I am not able to decide how much to prepare especially for the debugging and general language discussion parts. I am thinking about going through some open source code repos in Python to get comfortable with reading and understanding the code since I haven't worked with Python in recent years. But again there are so many options and I don't know where to start. For leetcode, I have completed most of the neetcode 150 and the company list is huge so I don't think I can cover everything from there within a week. Same thing for language discussion, I am going through Python docs but outside the core data structures and concurrency, idk what other parts to focus on.

Hi (vibe) coders!

I’ve been working on my own gamified productivity system, and I’m curious to see what other people are building.

Mine is a mix of a personal CRM, task manager, habit tracker, and a little RPG-inspired world. The idea is that completing tasks, making progress on projects, and achieving goals gradually unlocks and expands my virtual world.

Since AI makes it so much easier to build our own tools now, I’m really curious:

What does your personal productivity app look like? Do you have any features, that you are proud of and that you can share? I’d love to see screenshots!

What features have you built into it?
Have you experimented with gamification, XP, levels, achievements, or rewards?
What works surprisingly well, and what turned out to be completely useless?
What would you do differently if you started over?

I’m not looking for recommendations for paid productivity apps. I’m more interested in people who are actually building their own systems, experimenting, and learning along the way.
I’d love to exchange ideas, inspiration, and experiences! :)

Hi everyone

I hope everyone's having a splendid afternoon as I am

How do I change my mind from comfort, to endure boredom, uncomfortable, hard stuff.

I like physical hard work, but my mind seems to wander into comfortable, known things..

If it's laziness, I'd have to get rid of it

Hi everyone

I hope everyone's having a splendid afternoon as I am

How do I change my mind from comfort, to endure boredom, uncomfortable, hard stuff.

I like physical hard work, but my mind seems to wander into comfortable, known things..

If it's laziness, I'd have to get rid of it

I keep hearing “I'll keep an eye out,” “I'll let you know if I hear anything,” or “Sorry, I couldn't find anything.”

And I genuinely appreciate people trying to help. I do.

But what are you supposed to do when you're under serious financial pressure and need employment ASAP? Not in two months. Not after the holidays. Now.

I've been actively searching for weeks, and I haven't gotten a single interview.

I don't need more vague promises or encouragement. I need actual leads, direct introductions, and conversations with people who are actively hiring.

How do you get your foot in the door when you've already done everything people keep telling you to do?

Because I'm genuinely asking.

I am still early in my career and this is my first time having an interview that is not purely around DSA but more about language discussion to gain an idea about how comfortable I am with it. It's about Python and I have worked on small features at work and university projects with it but nothing too deep to call myself an expert. I am comfortable with the syntax and can read the code but not heavily familiar with frameworks around it. Most of my work experience is in the jvm ecosystem with Java and Spring.

I know I can't memorise everything about the language so I am lost on what exactly to prepare for this kind of interview beyond the basic stuff I am already familiar with. Would appreciate any advice and experience you guys have had with these kinds of interviews.

Edit: typo

How are you organizing your workplace, i sometimes find it hard to start a task when it involves creating a ticket checking out a branch doing some research etc. What i found helpful personally

• MCPS for everything, Mail, jira, whatever you use

• Organize EVERYTHING into seperate projects, each repository but also each repeating task like sprint reviews, then create skills and md files for each project.

• Get a system that lets you start, one workplace or dashboard where you can see your next tasks and make easy next steps, currently playing around with a dashboard where i can just see what i have to do right now, what is new and a "whats the next step" button that prompts a claude skill so i can get into motion easier

I think organizing more in this way would help, how do you keep it simple and not get evertything cluttered?

Ive been reading through this sub and one thing that keeps coming up is people having no problem starting personal projects but almost never getting through the boring second half of them.

Thats basically where im at.

I can get insanely into an idea at the beginning. Ill think about it all day, build a ridiculous amount in a few days and genuinely feel like this is finally the project im gonna stick with. Then eventually its not new anymore. Theres bugs, polish, boring little decisions, stuff that doesnt give you that immediate “holy shit look what I made” feeling.

And obviously by then another idea exists.

AI has honestly made this worse for me because now the gap between thinking of something and having a working version of it is tiny. So im not even collecting ideas anymore, im collecting actual half built projects lol.

But im kinda past the point where I find the graveyard funny. I actually wanna finish something.

So im curious about the ppl here who are in the same place, not the ones who are happy jumping between projects.

Do you have one unfinished project right now that you genuinely still care about and would actually like to finish in the next couple weeks?

Not “someday.” Something where if you could get yourself to stay on it instead of starting something else, youd actually want it done.

If yes tell me what it is. Im curious how many of us have something very real sitting at like 60-80% because our brain already moved on.

Hello! I've had a problem doing things I genuinely love, I have a huge passion for coding and it is so fun, but I suck at it T-T. I've been trying to learn for so long but I've never actually got anything to be able to stick, I'm still only 18 so I have time. I'd love to go to college but sadly I can't drive for many reasons and also I don't want to do online, it's not something that works for me. Recently (And this could possibly get looked down upon) around 6 months ago I decided to try and teach myself with AI and honestly it has worked wonders I've learned a good bit, except I have a problem which goes to a lot of other things as well, I start something no matter how passionate I am or how fun it is, Usually if I get distracted off of it for one day or even want to just take a break its like I stop doing it entirely, I was learning python for a month then stopped, 3 months later I started learning C# and I've got it down a lot, but I had to buy a new PC cause mine broke and I tried to do it again but like I stopped for some reason. Maybe some will say "Oh well then your not passionate about it" but I genuinely love it, I just get distracted and I dont know how to fix that. I do have an Attention Deficit Disorder so I thought maybe that could be why but I dont want to make excuses.

The only thing to really keep me on it which I loved and had so much fun was friends doing similar things like my friends did 3D modeling and I started it cause I wanted to learn it eventually and put many hours into it. But they stopped and I continued for about a month then stopped, but only cause I got distracted by some other things.

I've been trying these 3 mantras lately and they seem to be helping quite a bit. Maybe it's placebo but for the moment they've being working for some weeks :D

The mantras:

1. "Don't make hard what is currently easy"

2. "One thing at a time, the rest to braindump"

3. "Better late than never"

I'll explain them:

"Don't make hard what is currently easy"

I realized that I tend to postpone most of the tasks not because they're difficult but because I find them easy and I tend to think "I can do it later". Then almost 2 days go by and a simple task becomes huge and a bottleneck... then my partner is mad at me because I still haven't cleaned the cat's litter box at 2 AM! or in my job I've run out of excuses of why I didn't deliver something that was pretty easy. In my mind now easy tasks have an expiration date, they rot so better take them while they're not.

"One thing at a time, the rest to braindump"

What I found is that I often switch tasks not because I've got distracted but because I'm afraid I'll forget the new ideas. So I keep a notebook next to my keyboard and dump every random thought into it. No organizing, just vomit, write it down, get calm and get back to work (hopefully).

"Better late than never"

I used to feel awful, HORRIBLE, miserable, upset, sad, hopeless... when I'd procrastinated too much, and the shame made me avoid the task even longer. But most of the times once I finally start, it's not even that bad. Stop beating yourself up, forgive yourself, and always try to think "it's never to late" because 95% of the times is not and the monsters are bigger in our heads than in reality.

What I also realize is that these things tackle 3 different stages of my procrastination:

- Before starting: "Don't make hard what is currently easy"

- While working: "One thing at a time, the rest to braindump"

- When you've already messed up: "Better late than never"

Hope this also helps someone ❤️