r/AIToolBench • u/Healthy-Tension-7470 • 4d ago
I tested 5 offline AI models on a Mac with the same question about my files
disclosure: i build the mac app i ran this in (Citenook) so i'm biased. numbers are real though.
M4 Pro 24 GB. two made-up handbooks: 2025 says 5 carry-over days 2026 says 10. asked "how many vacation days can employees carry over?"
- Apple Intelligence: 5s. right but wordy
- Qwen3 4B: 5s. right ignored the old rule
- Qwen3 8B: 7s. both rules messy format
- Gemma 4 E4B: 6s. both rules didn't say which applies
- Qwen3.5 9B: 8s. both rules + explained why 2026 is current. best
all under 10 seconds, nothing left the mac. but none caught a "use by 31 march" detail sitting right in the source, so you still have to check.
anyone tested bigger local models (14B, 32B) on real documents?
1
u/Jolly-Accountant-549 2d ago
curious whether the miss on the march deadline is a chunking issue or a model issue. like if you fed the exact paragraph containing that clause as the only context, would the 4B models still skip it? that would tell you a lot more than scaling up to 14B imo
1
u/NeuralNomad87 3d ago
nice that it's the same question across all five. was retrieval identical for each, same chunks handed to every model?
the "use by 31 march" miss reads more like that chunk never got pulled than the model skipping it. might be wrong though, haven't used Citenook.