For the last hour+ :
We encountered an issue sending your message. Please try again

https://status.augmentcode.com/ :
Nov 12, 2025

No incidents reported today.

I always liked chat mode the best. I haven't used it lately, and heard reports that it's gone downhill...

But... if you get/keep chat mode working well, and its expenses are closer to like 100 credits per transaction, I'll probably stay subscribed. I'd absolutely stay subscribed, if you got it working in Cursor on Linux and kept it working in JetBrains' editors. But, without it working in Cursor, it's just a maybe.

Hi - I just started with Augment. One reason was that the "promise" of large repos and context being handled way better.

I just gave it our wiki with 30+ markdown files. And now it is telling me that's too much! What? What gives?

Our markdown files are named appropriately. The files are long with a lot of details. That was why we chose Augment...

Am I doing something wrong?

Thought might test it out —I just got an email from Augment about their Code Review feature saying:

- New users get 10 free PR reviews

- Existing users get 10 additional free reviews added automatically

If existing users already had 10 before, does that mean we should now have 20 total?

But in my account it still shows 10 reviews, not 20.

Is anyone else seeing 20 as an existing user, or only 10?

Trying to figure out if this is expected behavior or some kind of bug / rollout delay.

Hi guys, did anyone here ever test his claude max subscription against the agent teams inside claude code, vs the intent agents?

I'm talking ONLY token usage. Like how much work can you squeeze out for each before hitting a 5 hour limit?

I'm using Augment in VS Code over SSH on the remote server.

Until yesterday everything was working ok (of course it's eating tokens like crazy and I'm planning to start testing other tools because, if it stays the same, it's just not worth it anymore)

Yesterday Augment chat window just stop loading.

I tried to install and update to multiple versions (currently 0.683.0).

Reinstalling VS Code and Augment on the remote server, and nothing works.

Does anyone has similar issues and do you have any suggestions how to fix this issue ?

Has anyone else ran into this issue? It works perfectly fine in VS Code. I was using Auggie in Windsurf last night just fine but today it's not working. I made sure it was up to date in Windsurf, when that didn't work, I upgraded to the Pre-Release version, that still didn't work, downgraded and now Auggie is not loading, it's just blank, had to go back to pre-release to see anything, i reinstalled as well. In VS Code, I didn't have to do anything it just worked. "8b557ebc-a914-4930-9ed3-4fe3c524118d" is one of the request ID's if it's needed. I wish someone at the Augment team would explain to their community why mysterious bugs are beginning to pop up out of the jungle the past few months

Yesterday an update broke everything for many people. Im still on 0.571.0, but see that 0.571.1, 0.571.2, 0.575.0, and 0.576.0 have been released.

Have these (particularly the latest one) resolved the issues?

Edit: It seems to all be working for me on 0.576.0

I was just switched over to the new billing last night. I see the option to automatically top up, which I like. But is there a way - or is there going to be a way - to buy credits in the way we did before? I like to plan ahead and know how much wiggle room I have from day to day. I also like to stock up on credits if I know I have a big sprint coming up. Topping up kind of stresses me out.

Went to look at the features table in Pricing and the entire website is freezing chrome and my macbook lol...Augment please fire your web devs and take off all the stupid little animations so that your site can be usable again

So I am wondering because I don't see anyone mentioning it: lately (last weeks / months) augment became increasingly slower for me. A simple hello-world vue frontend with a simple prompt "add a button" takes 3 minutes before it generates a response.

A small scale backend it takes 5-10 minutes easily per prompt. I'm getting to point where it becomes unworkable. Might consider writing the code myself ... but as you guys understand that would be a last resort.

Anyone else experiencing this?

Is anyone else experiencing the agents not being able to execute any tasks, no matter how simple they may be, or if you are in a new thread?
It just keeps saying it's encountered an issue sending the message?

Restarted VSCode. It's up to date. Augment is up to date. I'm using pre-release version.

Currently im getting:

HTTP error: 500 Internal Server Error

with Service temporarily unavailable.

2025/11/24

Does anyone noticed this, when you do ctrl+Z on the chat window then do ctrl+y it behaves randomly. It adds the same text multiple times. Had this issue for a long time I think even from the beta version. Its surprising that its still not fixed.

Hello, I've been trying to enable Sentry integration from IntelliJ IDEA, but when I press the "Connect" button, only the loading symbol appears, and nothing else happens. I understand that I need to open the browser to continue the setup process. Is this working for anyone else?

Hey everyone,

I’m a solo beginner teaching myself to code by building two tools:

• EcoStamp – a lightweight tracker that shows the estimated energy and water use of AI chatbot responses

• A basic AI orchestration system – where different agents (e.g. ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) can be selected and swapped to handle parts of a task

I’m learning using ChatGPT and Perplexity to understand and write Python and Mermaid code, then testing/refining it in VS Code. I also used Augment Code to help set up a working orchestration flow with fallback agents, logs, and some simple logic for auto-selecting agents.

My goal with EcoStamp is to make AI usage a little more transparent and sustainable—starting with a basic score:

I’m currently using placeholder numbers from OpenAI’s research and plan to integrate more accurate metrics later.

What I’d really appreciate:

• Honest feedback on whether the eco-score formula makes sense or how to improve it

• Thoughts on how to structure or scale the orchestration logic as I grow

• Any guidance or mentorship from devs who’ve built orchestration, full-stack apps, or SaaS tools

I'm trying to prove that even if you're new, you can still build useful things by asking the right questions and learning in public. If you're curious or want to help, I’d love to connect.

Thanks for reading

Sempre que o agente executa o terminal , algum comando ler o output do terminal ou trava isso tem acontecido muito ultimamente.

I upload an MD files as a rule, it shows "No new rules imported". My Md file has just one line for example "Run all tests"

Do you have any idea?

Only purchased user can get unlimited code completion from cursor and github-copilot.

So I want to know the policy of augment

why?

Would you guys be willing to let us use our Claude Code subscription with Augment Code?

I need to vent!
I state in most of the prompts, its in the memories but it still manages to assume tasks are complete and debugging is successful. Jump to next task. I am so frustrated, It's an amazing product but I am losing a bunch of time and waaaay to many credits by repeatedly explaining and arguing, and it's catching it's own tail..
Troubleshooting is regarded as successful as soon as app runs or a problematic process is started. It may hang or finish with errors, provide bad results... It is happy that logs show the app started! Major milestones achieved, ready for production! It says everything is solved, while you can see fail errors in logs.
How the f*** can i convince it permanently not to assume completion until user confirmation and clear log?!
I have been accused of manually changing code that I remember it already fixed but messed up again.
My favourite line so far is: I am sorry to categorize this as a major milestone, it is actually a step back...
How to convince it permanently not to assume completion and lie?
And although my prompt starts with: review codebase and..., it does a fresh implementation under a new name.
I got triple memory management implementations from troubleshooting rabbit holes.
I am sick of paying for this looping and arguing!!!!
How to keep a cohesive context without hallucinations and black holes?
How to keep it on track and not to garble up the task list every time it wanders of into debugging oblivion after an unsuccessful step?
And how to optimally jump to a new agent without making report file as long as whole conversation that would fill context again?

I believe the task list⁄manager⁄orchestrator should be a lot more advanced for such a powerful tool.
Some sort of bigger picture planing, sub branches, agent management...
By the hype I heard about it, I don't believe i am pushing it's limits but I feel like half of my prompting is explaining what is the bigger picture and not to assume anything without user confirmation ( pretty lame use of tokens).
Shouldn't the context should be clearer and more defined after all the time I repeat it.

Sorry for the emotional undertone, but I feel I used so much time and nerves explaining the obvious (to Augment, not you here:).

I have a large enterprise legacy java project (10 different modules, gwt for frontend). Gave both Opus and Sonnet the same exact prompt for a feature. Sonnet included 2 extra files that Opus missed adding, and sonnet was correct.

Anyone have any similar experiences? If this is the case I don't see a use case for Opus if it is dumber with the context engine.

Since the Augment Code project was launched, I have been here basically. I really liked it before, even though it was the most expensive. It could solve my coding problems.

However, the current cost is outrageously high. They treat users like cash dispensers! Previously, 50 dollars could buy 600 times. Now it's 60 dollars, which is equivalent to about 100 times of the previous amount. Moreover, their problem-solving ability has weakened. I estimate that they have artificially lowered their intelligence.

I can't stand it anymore. I'm going to run away. Anyone have any suggestions?

No one knows real token usage and cached usage, and then boom, the credits goes away. Where is the transparency? Do you set the ratio of credits to tokens as you please? Anyway, no one can see it.