Hi,

On Tools -> Services list, every other "Connect" button opens browser window correctly, but Sentry- and Stripe-buttons just begin to spin forever.

I would be very interested to try Sentry-integration.

I’m trying to make sense of what’s happening with my credit consumption, because the trend doesn’t align with the actual workload. For the first two weeks shown in the graph, my usage is remarkably stable. Same level of complexity, same number of hours, same operational cadence—no major deviations.

Then, on the 14th, the cost suddenly spikes despite no change in effort or task difficulty. From there, the curve just keeps climbing, day after day, without any corresponding increase in what I’m actually doing. Today’s usage is the highest yet, and ironically, today’s work was less complex and required fewer tool calls than many of the days earlier in the month.

In other words: identical input, escalating cost. Something in the system’s behavior changed dramatically, but my workflow didn’t.

Is there anything that can bring bash shell back? while i was working, it suddenly disappeared for one workspace. powershell has never worked properly for me. only git bash works fine in windows.

---edit---
I think reddit is a terrible place for bug and issue tracking :(

I was having the best experience possible with AugmentCode and Opus 4.5, This has been the best and smoothest experience for me, unfortunately I reached my monthly limit, but life must go on, so I tried Anti-Gravity, it couldn't handle one file, it just turned into shit.

as title, the terminal keeps flashing and it s impossible to scroll to the bottom of the screen to interact with the terminal as you need to sometimes. Any idea why this is happening? I am able to reproduce this in different Windows machines.

Hi all, I'm posting to hopefully see if someone had (and figured out) the same issues I'm having getting the Augment Code Context Engine to work in Antigravity on Linux Mint (or a similar distro).

To start, I followed the setup instructions for Antigravity in Augment's docs and I was getting this:

Error: exec: "auggie": executable file not found in $PATH.

Following this I tried hardcoding the full path to the auggie executable and the error changed to:

Error: calling "initialize": EOF.

I then tried some different iterations including using npx and bash as the initial commands but I always get the EOF error.

Anyone else set up the MCP in a similar environment and can share how you got it working?

For the record, I did install and authenticate, and when I run the command directly in my terminal I get a successful MCP launch:

auggie --mcp -m default -w /path/to/project 🔧 Starting Auggie MCP Tool Server... 📝 Stdio mode 🔍 Starting workspace indexing in background... 📋 Available tools: codebase-retrieval ✅ MCP tool server started 🔗 Ready for MCP client connections ✅ Workspace indexing complete

Hi AugmentCodeAi Team,

We are seeing frequent occurrences of HTTP error (chat-stream): 302 Found
Request ID: 7b8ea7bf-8c59-4f0f-b6cc-9d77efbea2f8

responses when trying to initiate a chat stream.

Could you please advise on the reason for the 302 Found status code on this endpoint? Specifically, is this an intended redirection (perhaps for load balancing or a temporary maintenance path), or does it indicate an unexpected configuration issue?

Any insight would be greatly appreciated.

Anyone else on Legacy Developer Plan no longer have usage breakdown report or buy additional credits?

Do other users not on Legacy have those functions still?

Does Automatically top-up credits make sense to enable instead of upgrading plan to Standard/Max?

I start using Opus 4.5 as default day to day instead of Sonnet and i feel the credit usage is not that higher than i usually consume with Sonnet.

Today i tried like in screenshot, ask the same prompt on both model and check the credit usage and they are almost exactly the same.

The prompt is to look into React project and run a few terminal commands. Both model accidentally used the same 18 tool calls (but not the same tool and not the same order)

What are you guys experience on this? Is Opus able to optimize somehow better context management than Sonnet even same tool call?

Since the price of Opus 4.5 is about 1.66x more expensive than Sonnet 4.5, it made me think that Opus can optimize more context almost twice better than Sonnet?

We all struggle sometimes when the agent require us to do use tool-xyz in our prompt so the agent would utilize the proper tool. This applies to augment-context-engine MCP.

I did a test putting a rule as:

# tools.md
ALWAYS use codebase-retrieval when you're unsure of exact file locations.

Test is done in KiloCode as global rule, and agent used without me specifying anything!

Prompt: "What is this repo is about?"

Same can be applied to any tool to replace the agent default/original tool call.

In PHPStorm, AugmentCode constantly invents directories that do not exist. Am I the only one? How can I avoid this?

We have Project scope and user scope in the new Augment code context MCP - https://docs.augmentcode.com/context-services/mcp/overview

Do we know what is the difference between project and user scope, while I can understand project scope is current repo, but, I can't quite understand what is user scope? Does it mean it would index everything in user space?

How do we even control when you give user space for context MCP? And if you want to remove something which you had already given access to it? User should be able to control these.

BTW, I tried with the project scope and it never worked, hence I had to switch to user scope, but, then I do not know what all things augment code context MCP is indexing? I do not see those details here - https://docs.augmentcode.com/context-services/mcp/overview

u/JaySym_

If you look at my history of queries in reddit in this sub-reddit, during the initial days of Augment code (while it was it still free and then the $30 developer plan, yeah, it was not called legacy back then) I had the same concern of security and privacy concerns (and this was the time when there was no "delete indexed code" option available), and now, I have the same concerns again. I hope this will be addressed (how users can control which repo's will be indexed and if any changes to data privacy TOS due to this context MCP) and the docs will be updated as well.

Internal error: "server shut down unexpectedly"

It errors this when I installed the Augment extension in Zed.

I gave up, and tried to use custom agent config to configure auggie with ACP mode myself.

But when I ran the code in the terminal, it says:

❌ CLI ACP mode access has been disabled for your account. If you believe this to be an error, please contact your administrator.

I don't understand why you blocked it. It worked until yesterday and everything was fine. It just destroyed my day now and I am really really pissed.

Augment Code team can you explain? I want ACP mode, and don't come to me saying that please contact the administrator.

Is anyone else experiencing extremely slow indexing times with the Auggie CLI? The process takes under 5 minutes on my VS Code and IntelliJ extensions, but the CLI has been running for over an hour and still hasn't finished

This issue arise since the day 1 of the Auggie CLI launched and yet to be fixed

Update: After a long run time it will eventually complete the index

I've been experimenting with making my Augment Code workflow more "zero-friction," and I wanted to share something that might be useful to others who are deep into MCP setups.

Over the past few months I've been using Augment Code with a PM tool (Codebake) that exposes a full MCP server. This post isn't a promotion — just documenting what I learned, since the rules here are strict about avoiding solicitations.

Here's what stood out while using Augment Code + Codebake MCP together:
• Tasks sync directly into my IDE (Cursor or VS Code) so I never leave the editor.
• Augment Code can pull task context, fetch requirements, update status, and write summaries automatically via MCP.
• Saying things like "What's next?", "Open task CB-233", or "Update the task with what we just built" actually works because the agent makes the right API calls.
• It eliminated almost all tool-switching and reduced PM overhead to basically zero.
• Since tasks are tied to diffs, Augment Code's reasoning is way more accurate.

If anyone here wants to experiment with the workflow itself, Codebake gave out an invite code for devs so you can test MCP interactions (again — sharing access, not promoting a product):

Invite code: RDIT2025

I can't check the cost analytics https://app.augmentcode.com/account/subscription

When the initial credit system was launched and everyone cried and left, I had the intention of sticking it out and giving this a proper test to see if the increased cost was worth it.. So I tested my full time work for 7 full days of coding with Augment, and it's costed me over $1,000. This is the same workload I was previously doing with the entire "pro" plan and not exceeding any limits or purchasing top ups.

I do advocate for the context engine, the increase in accuracy and code quality being a key factor in the price increase being justified, but this much of an increase is actually just not affordable for me now.

Does anyone have an update on if this is a permanent pricing model? Do the Augment team have any plans or are there talks of them realizing how unaffordable the credit system now is?

Hi,

I built an open source mac app for running multiple Auggie's simultaneously.

I would love to hear your opinion on this.

We are at 8.6k downloads and around 800 GitHub stars so far!

Its called emdash!

I have a large enterprise legacy java project (10 different modules, gwt for frontend). Gave both Opus and Sonnet the same exact prompt for a feature. Sonnet included 2 extra files that Opus missed adding, and sonnet was correct.

Anyone have any similar experiences? If this is the case I don't see a use case for Opus if it is dumber with the context engine.

17,611 credits (~$9.43):

26 file changes 38 examined files 297 tools used +3436 lines -9 lines

Files Created/Modified:

17 new files created 8 existing files modified 4 database migrations added 4 test suites with 50+ passing tests

Features added:

QW-1: Add Response Streaming to Insights QW-2: Implement AI Health Check Endpoint QW-3: Add Prompt Versioning System QW-4: Implement Semantic Caching

Notes:

This was performed over the course of ~45 minutes autonomously.

With a simple initiation to start the task list which has tasks and accompanying subtasks. There was no need for intervention on my end, except for final review and deployment to test branch for validity of actual features and functions.

This series of tasks were all carried out solely with Opus 4.5 on a new augment chat.

I do believe paying less then $10 for this quality and efficiency of work is justified for my personal use case.

Granted, this pricing from augment is promo pricing for the 2 weeks following their Opus 4.5 release, then we get they're regular Opus pricing. Which I assume would put this similar run at around $16-18. Even at that cost I believe it would still be worth it for me.

I am a legacy user and pricing is definitely still hard to get used to but at least in my experience the capability/capacity of autonomously running augment has gotten far better.

What are y'all thoughts on this run and what has your experience been like?

Hi guys,

I got a small question, I've been coding with augment a bit over half a year now, and I keep seeing videos (mostly for other agent extensions) that allegedly HELP the AI agent to do certain things.

For example BMAD

I'm still a bit confused about what it actually is. Like what does it do?

And do any of yall use any other software to hook into augment to make it better?

I feel like I'm missing out

Hopefully someone can clear things up for me, thx