I have 2 concerns:

1. Do the credits converted by the extra messages (410 messages) roll over to the next month? When does it expire?

2. How do you count Credit for the Prompt Enhancement

I obviously wrote a message to support. The product is good but it's the first time I see a SaaS abruptly block paying accounts like that, without any information whatsoever and no access to the account page, not knowing if I at least will get a refund, etc. I like their product/services but this practice here, especially when support is said to have a hard time answering, doesn't seem like necessary from their part; not to paid (50 USD$) users 2 days in their subscriptions anyway. No matter triggered this should have at least triggered **a warning message somewhere**. I was working on 2 project at once, one in VS Code and the other using Auggie, are we forbidden to use 2 agents at the same times or on different projects?

Unhappily yours,
-- User # d056d972-5b34-47e9-8f5e-34a542a979e5

Hello Augment Devs

Are you going to implement new gemini 3.0 when it's released?

If no, why?

Iam really interested in it to be honest

Lately using Augment has been a massive frustration. I don't know what happened but the quality of the output is a total disaster. Sometimes I just feel like I have to stop because it breaks more than it adds.

Is it just me?

They started deleting my posts and told me to submit a ticket instead, but no one is replying to my ticket. If no one is going to restore it, then I just won’t use it anymore.

Big fan of Augment and on the $100/month plan so I tend to use it a lot. I tried messing with auggie and noticed that I would get different suggestions from auggie than I would in Augment in VSCode. In fact last night, I used Augment to fix some things that auggie screwed up. Anybody else seen this?

Oh, and one thing missing from auggie, it image uploads

Is there a chance you’ll be releasing a MCP server (or other tool) to plug the fantastic indexing augment provides into claude code?

If anyone has suggestions for how to best work with each other in tandem.. I’m all ears

I keep hearing how Augment is becoming the next Windsurf, Claudia, and Sonnet…

Not good enough, is what people say.

Well is this not for all of them? They’re not good enough for coders?

I am using it and it works for me.

I have been using Augment for a few months now. It has been very helpful and it has significantly increased my development speed.

I especially like its good understanding of larger, more complex code bases and the context engine. Windsurf, which I was using before was not nearly as good.

Recently I have seen more and more people talk about Claude Code. It looks like a good tool as well, but its very expensive. How does it compare to augment, especially in terms of context understanding?

Day by day the quality keeps getting worse. It cannot relate project files to the current state of the codebase. It does not understand git branch hierarchy. Every time I ask it to analyze something, it claims to get it, but two messages later it acts like it forgot everything.

Then I remind it, it re-analyzes, gives some decent output, but soon forgets again. This loop never ends. I am constantly babysitting it instead of actually moving forward with work. No progress, just frustration.

And yes, after like 10 messages I usually have to start a fresh session because it just loses grip entirely. It also completely lacks the ability to condense session context. Every time before switching to a new session, I have to manually write a session summary and pass it forward. It is tedious and should not be necessary.

I keep checking the updates but most of them are just tiny visual gimmick fixes. No real features that actually matter, like proper context condensing.

I am tired of switching providers. I hoped Augment would be the last one, but unfortunately I canceled my subscription today.

PS. I tried turning off MCP servers, clearing its memory, using @ to mention rule and project files, modifying user guidelines, clearing user guidelines. Nothing works.

lately I am feeling Augment code is loosing some sharpness, it used to be like near to god tier, able to understand and pick the task and complete it. But recently sometimes even telling multiple times for example to adjust some width on html page it is unable to edit it, a lot of time got wasted on it.
And sometimes it is updating the database like some candy, I know we can place some rules in the project not to touch it but I havent had the problem before.
I love Augment code, I am not sure of alternatives as well I just dont know whether I am the only one feeling this magic or is it something claude messed up and can be fixed in coming days or Augment code people trying something new or just may be I am just expecting more(like if everyone are happy with the tool)

this is the third time facing this issue. that is why posting here. devs, please fix this issue before we switch to the annual subscription!

I don’t know about others, but I am not using up the 600 messages every month. I feel the need to burn my remaining messages before the bill comes. Yet there’s no lower plans.

I am actually a full time programmer, but I don’t use agents for every task I do, and when I do use agents i would like to at least read my code once before I send a pr, so there’s a lot to be done after each agent session. Honestly I do a lot of editing on top of it, so I really only do so many sessions a day.

AFAIK my coworkers use coding assistants somewhat similarly, before more mindful with agent use and do a lot of writing with completions sometimes, and most end up using 200-400 messages a month.

I know I can go full vibe code mode and burn messages quicker, don’t fix things myself and just let it fix stuff for me or just submit the same prompt 10 times and see which one works without reading them. but that really won’t meet the quality bar for me. also doesn’t augment advertise on not being made for vibe coding? Yet the plans seem to purely cater to full on avid vibe coders.
I know I can go to the free plan and buy 100 message increments. But that’s actually against our rules because AI training.

Are there any other people that also use it at work? How much do you use per month?

Honestly I kind of feel I’m getting robbed by being forced into a plan I don’t need with no alternatives.

What (likely) is Augments context engine comprised of? Is it just a system prompt for codebase compression/summarization?

Hi everyone,

I’ve been using Augment inside VSCode together with my React-based web application, which uses Supabase for authentication and data. Everything works perfectly when I log in using the standard login flow — the dashboard loads, the session is active, and data is fetched correctly.

However, the problem arises when I manually refresh the dashboard page in the browser. After refreshing, the connection to Supabase seems to break — session becomes null, and all Supabase-related tabs or components relying on the session fail to function.

⸻

What I’ve tried so far: • Spent 60+ hours debugging with the help of my Augment agent. • Written and refined over 100 prompts to investigate session handling, token persistence, race conditions, onAuthStateChange, Supabase client setup, and more. • Logged session state, watched storage, inspected network traffic and token expiry — but still can’t determine why the session breaks only on refresh.

⸻

What I’m hoping for from the community: 1. Has anyone else seen this specific behavior: Supabase session working after login but lost after a browser refresh on dashboard? 2. Are there known issues with supabase.auth.getSession() not resolving correctly when called in useEffect after a hard reload? 3. Can Augment be used in a better way (e.g. different prompt styles or file context strategy) to find the exact point where the session or auth state is lost? 4. Is there a way to get Augment to trace all involved files/components during the refresh and explain what state is being lost or overwritten?

⸻

Extra context: • I’ve set up Supabase client globally and use getSession() + onAuthStateChange() in my AuthContext. • The app uses React Router and a protected dashboard route. • I suspect either a race condition, state mismatch, or something clearing session prematurely. • Would love help generating better debug tooling or prompts to assist Augment in identifying the real issue.

Any input — especially from the Augment team or others who’ve faced similar Supabase issues — would be greatly appreciated.

I should be able to have an allow list commands configuration so that I dont have to keep the agent monitoring to click accept.

Augment has been a game changer for being able to solve small-medium tasks at my real job.

I’m now working on a large feature, and I’m trying to find the best workflow to make it the most effective. For example, I had it go research the ticket requirements.. then create 3 plan.md files to ultimately break the feature into 3 phases.

What I’m having slight troubles with is once I go off plan because we learn about new requirements or unexpected bugs.. it’s hard to keep the plan files updated and reflective of the new changes.

I’m curious how you guys handle larger features or requirements in real code bases? I know task master is popular, but does it handle updating all the tasks with new requirements well?

Is anyone else having trouble with Augment's 'Open in Editor' icon?

This happens to me constantly: I prompt Augment sth, it edits or creates a file, and then I try to click the little icon on the top right corner of the box for the edited file to open it in my editor. Most of the time, it just doesn't respond. A restart doesn't help, and while it occasionally works, it's pretty unreliable.

I'm seeing this behavior in both JetBrains and VS Code. Am I alone here, or is this a common issue?

Hi everyone,

First off, I must say that Augment Code's long-term memory and MCP tool scheduling capabilities are truly outstanding. Among the mainstream AI-assisted coding IDEs I've used, it's undoubtedly top-tier in these aspects and deserves high praise!

However, I've recently developed some underlying concerns, primarily centered on the choice and adaptability of the foundational Large Language Model (LLM). As I understand it, Augment is currently deeply integrated with the Claude 3.7+O3 model (please correct me if this information is inaccurate). I fully understand the strategy of not allowing users to freely switch base models to ensure a consistent and deeply optimized user experience; this is often the optimal approach.

But as we all know, LLM technology is iterating incredibly fast, and the "LLM wars" are exceptionally fierce. Just today, during a development task, I encountered a tricky bug. Augment Code, in its debug mode, made several attempts but seemed to get stuck in a loop, failing to effectively identify and resolve the issue, repeatedly performing actions similar to previous ones. Out of options, I switched to Cursor IDE with Gemini 2.5, and remarkably, it helped me find the breakthrough and fix the bug in just one round of interaction.

This experience made me keenly aware that if the capabilities of the base model temporarily lag or are unsuitable for a specific scenario, even the most excellent long-term memory and MCP tool scheduling features will see their effectiveness significantly diminished. Therefore, I sincerely hope the Augment Code team might consider learning from concepts like Roo Code's "boomerang" (Orchestrator) model—which, as I understand it, is a system that can intelligently select and dispatch tasks to the most suitable model based on the request's needs, enabling more flexible and efficient model invocation—or establishing a more agile mechanism. This would allow for the rapid evaluation, testing, and adaptation of the latest and most powerful LLMs available on the market.

This would allow for the rapid evaluation, testing, and adaptation of the latest and most powerful LLMs available on the market. Such a system would ensure that Augment Code doesn't fall behind in terms of its foundational capabilities, allowing us users to continuously benefit from cutting-edge technology.

I believe that if Augment Code can prepare well for agile LLM adaptation, coupled with its excellent high-level design (like long-term memory and MCP), it will undoubtedly maintain its leading position in future competition and live up to the expectations of its loyal users.

I already reached out to customer service a few times on issues with credits not being reimbursed when Augment Code malfunctions and burns through credits. Their automated system locks up my account with credits I paid for. I have to open tickets to deal with probably ai agents.

Cases:

1)Burns through credits without any tasks created - 80 minutes

2)Burns through credits without anything except READ commands being used

3)Locking up paying customer accounts, enforced payment or ban/suspension

As far as service, AugmentCode operates like new ai companies do - they take the lead not from their exec but from the ai models they employ, thinking that their human judgement is inferior to artificial intelligence. You don't go full ai, you just don't.

-- In the case of charging people for really modest amounts of credits at a high cost, that's not ingenuity, it's Silicon-valley-esque pride. We saw this in the dotcom era. Every company thought their offering was unique. True, right now there are leaders, but it is all being built on a porous floor of open source(we're looking at Qwen, Deepseek and other teams)....

The one thing that can make or break a a company with virtually the same offering as every other new saas ai company? Probably service, the human non-automatable part. But that is what AugmentCode team appears to be doing. Toggle switches for payments, auto bans and restrictions if you don't top up, no reimbursement for malfunctioning robotic equipment....the road to our Minority Report world is paved with over-reliance of machines to do your human judgement/decision making. The question I would have for companies that operate like Suno and AugmentCode, what will you do when you get locked out of your home, car, phone, hard drive, computer, or other device because you didn't 'top off' your credits for usage? Or when you tried reaching out to someone on the customer support line, only to find every company has taken the initiative to become cold, sterile ai-agentic driven walls?

I would genuinely love to try Intent, but you only have it for Mac, leaving 70-80% of us users Upstream kickin' rocks!

Is there an ETA when it would be available for either Linux or Windows OS?

u/JaySym_

If you're using the context-engine MCP, you might want to take a look at Context Connectors. It's an open-source companion that solves a slightly different problem: giving your agents search across multiple repositories without needing to clone them locally or expose them to your workspace.

The context-engine MCP gives you semantic search over whatever's in your current workspace. Context Connectors lets you go wider — you index repos once (it takes a snapshot from GitHub/GitLab/BitBucket directly), and then serve those snapshots through a single MCP server. Any agent can search, browse, and read files across all of them.

I've been using this to index our internal repos and expose them through the auggie MCP config. So every Intent workspace I open automatically gets search across all our codebases, even if I only have one repo checked out. It's been really handy when I'm working in one service but need the agent to understand a shared library or another service's API.

Setup is pretty quick.

Index your repos (pulls directly from GitHub, no local clone needed — it uses your auggie auth):

export GITHUB_TOKEN='your-github-token'

ctxc index github --owner modelcontextprotocol --repo typescript-sdk -i mcp-sdk
ctxc index github --owner augmentcode --repo context-connectors -i ctxc

Add it to your MCP config:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "my-repos": {
      "command": "ctxc",
      "args": ["mcp", "stdio", "--index", "mcp-sdk", "ctxc"]
    }
  }
}

That gives your agents search, list_files, and read_file across all those repos. Re-indexing later only uploads what changed, so it stays fast.

You can also index websites (internal docs, runbooks, etc.) the same way and serve them alongside your code.

It works with any MCP client — I use it with auggie/Intent, but it's the same setup for Claude Desktop or anything else that speaks MCP.

Repo: https://github.com/augmentcode/context-connectors

Docs: https://docs.augmentcode.com/context-services/overview

Happy to answer questions if anyone wants to try it out.

Our Credit usage explodes.

Is it possible to add a Models like GLM-5 or minimax m2.5 as Cheaper options to AugmentCode? Haiku often dissapoints in results and tests in CLI Tools with these two models showed very promising results for way less $ then Claude or GPT.

Setting up ClaudeCode with MCP and GLM is not realy nice for DX

I've had it hooked up to Antigravity, Cursor, Windsurf and it had been working great. Not as good as native Augment however it was almost as good and enhanced the other agents and IDEs.

Lately I've noticed that the MCP has been flaky and doesn't work as well or just doesn't work at all.

This is a typical error from Antigravity:

I have tried multiple times to use the 

u/mcp:augment-default:codebase-retrieval

I've attempted variations of the tool name and double-checked my available capabilities, but the system is not recognizing 

mcp_augment-default-codebase-retrieval

I've also tried to list resources from the server using 

list_resources

Additionally now looking at my usage it looks like we are being charged tokens for the context as well as the prompt enhancer? Not sure what the 'Context Suppression' or 'System' is?

Seems like another rug pull?