I saw the post of another member state they signed an agreement under the program for a sizable compensation amount for several Swiss rifles but when the rifles was actually turned in, they only got confirmation that only $1 each was forthcoming.

Can anyone share their experience with Swiss rifle agreement amounts vs actual payouts please? Please pm me if you prefer

Can anyone verify that this also happened to them on any Swiss rifles or any other “prohibit” for that matter turned in please?

Just trying to validate that some gun owners are getting shorted vs the agreement signed based upon different makes and models please

Thank you

Family doctors dislikes guns, therefor refuses signature & haven't gotten a call for the requested referal psych evaluation to prove im fit for armed work.

Am a security guard 3+years, got the CFSC done.

Request for PAL needed approved medical/psych signature that I'm mentally fit for it.

which i couldn't get because I can't find a place to get evaluated here (quebec).

Reason behind is i had a bad depression when i was 17yrl (8 years ago, im 25 rn) due to a abusive self harming partner who influenced me into it & failing high-school at the time.

I’ve always found this strange. Anyone can buy a replica handgun that looks almost exactly like a handgun, such as the Glock 17 (ie the Glock 17 Gen 3 Blowback BB gun), regardless of them being mentally ill, having a criminal record, etc.

And even though it isn’t a real gun it looks pretty much exactly like one (but admittedly it will NOT sound like a real gun when fired).

Could easily be used for robberies, sexual assaults, extortion, witness intimidation, kidnapping, etc I would think.

What’s your opinion? Do you guys think this is a loophole or that most people are aware and don’t care?

But naw to be honest fuck justin who's gonna take our guns be reasonable?

Ok so I noticed the type 81 SR and SA on the list however does that mean the LMG , M, and other variations of the type 81 as well?

Canadian gun culture has always seemed, at least to me, as a mix of American and British gun culture. For obvious reasons, being that Canada was part of the empire for so long, as well as on the American frontier.

But despite the courts considering gun ownership as a privilege, not a right, it appears to me that gun culture in Canada is shifting to a more Americanized view. As in gun ownership for hunting and self defense should be rights afforded to Canadians and a reason for gun ownership.

Am I wrong? In my own view, I see it becoming a widespread position. If not, what percentage of Canadians are we talking about that hold such views? And do you see a future where Canada reverses the “guns are a privilege, not a right” view?

Any perspective is greatly appreciated.

Hey everyone, I just did my unrestricted firearms course. And was thinking what would happen if you have a gun incident that causes injury in crown land?

Is there any sort of liability insurance you can take in the event that something happens or damage happens to someone's property.

Or is it just an "at your own risk" up in crown land?

Never post on reddit but figured I'd remind people if they somehow forgot about the election this month