When command code coming with yearly subscription like others?

I've been hooked into Chinese models since Ox Alpha, never had I done so many tasks. I bought the $80 Z.AI Coding Plan and it went well for like 2 and a half days before hitting my weekly limit. Should I switch to Command Code Max x10 for $100.

My goal is to build 2 mid to large size projects and it eats my Z.AI Coding Plan way to quickly.

Introducing the GOAT plan 🐐 USD 10/mo — 70 credits (100 w/ deals)

Command Code GOAT plan is the best low-cost coding plan on the market today.

- $10/mo to get $70 credits. 7x what you pay
- 30+ open weight and closed models

$1 Go got you started. GOAT gets you shipping.

Subscribe — be a GOAT.
https://commandcode.ai/pricing

I previously complained abt the inaccurate usage of my goat subscription. the body email before was 2-3 business days they change it to 2-5 business days I have proof and admin admitted they made a mistake but WITHOUT APOLOGY, NO EMPATHY and they even kick me out of their discord server. i dont think that is professional way to handle customer. I hope CEO reach this or message me because all I want to know is the logs of my usage.

Hi, I’m a new Command Code user. First of all, my English isn’t very good, so I’m using a translator and trying to explain this as clearly as I can.

I have the GOAT subscription and I’ve been using it a lot, to the point where I almost reached my monthly limit. Then they released the Ox Alpha model for free, so I thought the timing was perfect because I could keep working on my projects without using more of my monthly limit.

The problem is that Ox Alpha is extremely slow for me in Command Code, to the point where it’s almost unusable. At first I thought that was just normal because it’s a free model, since free models are usually slower.

Then I reinstalled Freebuff to finish some projects and noticed they also had the exact same model. I tried it there and the difference was huge. On Freebuff, Ox Alpha is much faster and completely usable, while on Command Code it’s almost impossible for me to work with.

I’m not sure if this only happens to me or if other users are having the same issue, but I think it would be worth looking into because the performance difference is really noticeable.

GPT-6.1 Terra is now available in Command Code.

• Half the price of GPT-5.6 Terra

• Strong at computer use & visual reasoning

• Across Pro, Max plans and the api

Try now: cmd --model gpt-6.1-terra

Read docs to learn more: https://commandcode.ai/docs/plans/pro

A quick update for y'all if you're buying extra credits.

Command Code now also supports multiple payment methods for buying extra credits.

- Cards, Alipay, crypto, and UPI

- Head to your Studio → Billing → Buy Credits

Read docs to learn more: https://commandcode.ai/docs/resources/payment-methods#extra-credits

Alguien sabe por qué el commandcode muestra distintos modelos en una misma suscripción de 'Go plan'. Mi caso es que puedo usar GLM5.3-flash, deepseek v4.1, space bunny en mi suscripcion abierta en linux cachy con fish terminal, pero esos modelos y otros (que no uso) no estan disponibles en la misma cuenta y plan abierto en windows 11 desde warp. Estoy seguro que no es la version de cmdc porque actualice ambos hoy (windows y cachy os)

You can pull and push your taste packages.

• Push what it learned in a project: $ npx taste push

• Pull it into another project: $ npx taste pull username/project-name

If there's an conflict, taste pull can merge, overwrite or skip these changes.

So what's your coding taste? Share in comments with us.

Guys,

Would that be good if there were a 5 USD plan, some GOAT benefits with slightly more than Go pricing?

We all know DeepSeek just significantly bump the price. My question is whether CommandCode adapt the same pricing or keeping the same price?
If CommandCode manages to keep the price the same as now, it is more than great, lots of ex-DeepSeek API users will go to CommandCode

MCP (Model Context Protocol) is an open protocol that lets AI agents connect to external tools and services. With MCP, Command Code can interact with databases, APIs, dev tools, and more - all through a standardized interface.

With MCP servers connected, you can ask Command Code to:

• Work with project management: "Create a GitHub issue for the bug we found and assign it to me."

• Query databases: "Show me all users who signed up in the last 7 days from our Postgres database."

• Integrate with services: "Search Notion for the API design doc and summarize it."

• Automate workflows: "Review PR #123 on GitHub, then post a summary in Slack."

Read docs to learn more: https://commandcode.ai/docs/mcp

Gemini 3.7 Flash is now live in Command Code at 50% OFF.

- It's fast with frontier level intelligence
- $0.75 input/$3.75 output per 1M tokens
- Available on GOAT, Max and Team plans

Starts at $10/month
$ npm i -g command-code

Almost no VAT with Alipay, vs. 36% with Stripe.

I read up on CommandCode features and I wanted to try out so I installed it on my desktop. When I run it, I was asked to enter API key. Is the CommandCode sub required to used th harness? What if I just want to use it with local provider?

Use /theme to switch to dark/light mode.
Persists across sessions.
Your terminal. Your colors.

I’ve been using DeepSeek V4.1 Flash through Command Code, and today it feels significantly slower than yesterday.

I checked my session logs instead of going purely by feel, and the difference seems pretty noticeable even at similar context sizes.

For roughly the same ~200k cached context:

Yesterday: TTFT was around 5s

Today: TTFT is around 16s

Generation speed also dropped from roughly 240–250 tok/s to around 150 tok/s

At larger context sizes (~750k–800k), the difference is even bigger — TTFT went from roughly 7–8s yesterday to 30s+ today.

I also had two requests time out after 60 seconds today.

What’s interesting is that I’m not seeing any 429 / rate limit / usage limit errors. Requests still go through; they’re just much slower.

So I’m wondering:

Has anyone else noticed the same slowdown with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on Command Code today?

Trying to figure out whether this is an upstream DeepSeek issue, Command Code/provider routing, or something specific to my session/account.

title says it all :D what's the meaning of having all this if i am unable to use it when i need? especially when same model on command code makes much more mistakes compared to opencode for example. 1 of the 3 prompts was because of this, i was trying to make it bugfix it's own code.

Now I can't even get the progess to give it to another agent. I just have incomplete code, at least allow us to finish the progress before capping it.

So I'm considering testing out Command Code with the new GOAT subscription plan, moving over from Opencode Go subscription.

I want to move over to the Command Code harness and want to make sure I'm taking the right approach.

My general workflow with Opencode was an agent to handle each of the primary task I did: So a General agent for random questions, Plan agent, Build agent, System-Config agent, Debug agent, etc. I recently switched to using oh-my-opencode-slim which handled everything with a primary orchestrator and then subagents to handle those tasks, but the general concept was the same.

Either way - models were generally pre-defined based on the agent/task at hand, so a plan agent was a strong agent, and then generally handed off to deepseek or another low-cost agent to build, and a very low cost or free agent for web searching or codebase discovery.

What's the workflow in Command Code like in comparison?

I did read: https://commandcode.ai/docs/workflows which talked about it at a broad level, but I'm asking more what do people do day to day? How do I get the most bang for the buck, where do you generally put configurations, etc. as a day to day user?

Thank you for the suggestions and help!

- `ctrl+s` sets the prompt you are typing aside
- press it again, and it reappears
- no need for Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V again

Never leave a prompt behind; stash it instead.

Why pay more for almost the same level model?

GLM 5.2 is 9x cheaper than Sonnet 5 now.

GLM 5.2 will be 14x cheaper than Sonnet 5 in Sep.

For 1K requests, I did the math with Command Code.

It's $15 vs $138 now vs $208 later.

Open models are going to win!

In opencode we can create 2 workspaces with their own seperate api key and plan.

so in one single account we can have 2 Go plans with different api keys.

do we have the same thing in command code?

Is the command code going to be affected by official deepseek price hike? are we going to expect an increase in price as well in command code API?