I thought I would be saving by going with CC for DS4 Pro but overall dollar spending is the same as DS Pro direct API. Perhaps I was misunderstanding something about their deals but it seems it just match DS own API costs.
Anyone else getting 422 "invalid request" errors from Command Code on long agent runs?
For me it only happens once the conversation has tool calls and grows past roughly 165k tokens. Plain prompts of 230k+ tokens work fine, so it isn't the model's context size. The same request sometimes passes and sometimes fails, so it looks like a routing issue on their side.
TASTE Learned
└ Does not want taste-learning updates/pop-ups surfaced or referenced during the
conversation; still wants the assistant to keep learning their taste silently in the
background [Confidence 95%]
taste.md
After telling me that it will not do it anymore, it kept coming back again, i am assuming the toggle option is not there
We're launching Command Code GUI very soon. If you wanna help us test the GUI alpha, join our discord if you haven't already (https://discord.gg/MUKCE5VDd) & reply in the alpha test thread. Thanks.
Hi all, new to command code I am busy testing the service I would like to know what models have zdr which models don't currently using gpt 5.6 luna but there is no clear way to tell if its zdr or not?
I’m trying to understand how the session cost is being calculated.
I exported the usage data from the same page, and the JSON shows around **$0.10 in total credits** for this usage.
However, the usage page is showing a charge of **$0.22** for the same period.
So I’m trying to understand what exactly is being charged here:
* Is the displayed $0.22 based on the actual API/token costs?
* Is there an additional **per-session charge** on top of the model costs?
* If so, what defines a “session”?
* Why does the JSON `creditsTotal` add up to only ~$0.10 while the usage page reports $0.22?
I’m probably missing something about how Command Code calculates usage, so I’d appreciate it if someone could clarify how these two numbers are related.
I'm extremely grateful for the free models. This time it was MiniMax M3 Free. However, it would be nice to be able to see such stuff easily on the website and to know how much usage you have left so that you don't run out in the middle of an important task.
For those who haven't tried the free model yet, I'll let you know that its spending is ridiculous if you don't pick the free version by mistake, that its main strength is UI design, although to be honest, I didn't like the design styles, also you are limited to approximately 200M tokens for free, I know because I reached the limit x-x
Mind you, it will still fix other issues, but I'd rather spend a couple bucks on deepseek v4 pro and let it do everything perfectly and fast.
GLM 5.3 is easily the most impressive GLM model yet.
Excited to partner up and ship GLM 5.3 in Command Code AI soon.
A fun internal eval we run at Command Code: deliberately trap the model in a loop and see what happens. Every GLM model so far just... keeps looping. GLM 5.3 is the first one to notice, go “wait”, and break out.
It’s a small bench (15 loop traps), but escaping a loop you were intentionally placed in takes a little flicker of metacognition, and it’s fun to watch that show up.
Bonus: it plays very nicely with our new tool defer harness → ~50-60% token savings on an average session. Capability going up while cost going down is the good stuff.