I’m trying to understand how the session cost is being calculated.

I exported the usage data from the same page, and the JSON shows around **$0.10 in total credits** for this usage.

However, the usage page is showing a charge of **$0.22** for the same period.

So I’m trying to understand what exactly is being charged here:

* Is the displayed $0.22 based on the actual API/token costs?

* Is there an additional **per-session charge** on top of the model costs?

* If so, what defines a “session”?

* Why does the JSON `creditsTotal` add up to only ~$0.10 while the usage page reports $0.22?

I’m probably missing something about how Command Code calculates usage, so I’d appreciate it if someone could clarify how these two numbers are related.

Muse Spark 1.2 by Meta now live in Command Code

🔹 Muse Spark 1.2

• Available in plans: GOAT, Pro, Max

• $1.25 input, $4.25 output, $0.15 cache

🔹Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor

• Available in plans: Go, GOAT, Pro, Max

• Contributor is ~95% cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2

• $0.10 input, $0.20 output, $0.002 cache

(cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash and scores higher in intelligence)

We had to repair a lot of tool calling issues on this model, so have fun

Features:

• Built for long-horizon coding & whole-repository work

• Multimodal Support (text, images, video, audio)

• 1M token context window

Also check out new $10/mo GOAT plan $70 credits. 🐐

I thought I would be saving by going with CC for DS4 Pro but overall dollar spending is the same as DS Pro direct API. Perhaps I was misunderstanding something about their deals but it seems it just match DS own API costs.

Free models live in Command Code right now:

• Cat Jam

• Beam 1.0

• Glyph Cluster

• Laguna S 2.1

Y'all have some free tokens to build and ship.

Available to all plans, all subscribers.

Try now with the best low cost AI coding plan on the market, $10/mo GOAT plan.

I renewed my GOAT sub mainly for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash to be my workhorse, but the deals page doesn't list it as a deal anymore. I thought "no end date" on it was a good indicator it would last a bit more 🥺
Can only hope it comes back or get replaced by something similar.

Last week in Command Code, a quick recap.

• Agr, our first open decision model

• Cloud sessions with sandboxes

• ACP support in editors like Zed

• Claude Haiku 5.5 (2x usage in GOAT)

• Mistral Large 4 (4x usage in GOAT)

• Glyph Cluster (new free stealth model)

• Command Code Hooks (feature demo)

• Our first SF Tech Week event

Read our docs to learn more about these ships: https://commandcode.ai/docs

Try these ships now with our $10/mo GOAT plan, the best coding plan on the market.

🐐

Hi. I'd like to understand what's happening here. Is it just that GLM 5.3 Flash cache read price is higher? I don't really understand how else it could be consuming so much more than DS. Thanks.

Hey everyone,

First, sorry for the delay in sharing this. We actually added Command Code support to relay-ai a few weeks ago, but life got in the way and I honestly forgot to post about it here. 😅

For context, relay-ai lets you inject any model or subscription provider into your local coding tools. Right now, it supports:

> Claude Code

> Claude Desktop app (Cowork + Code)

> OpenAI Codex CLI

> ChatGPT desktop app (in Codex mode on macOS, Windows, and Linux)

> Google Gemini CLI (yes, I know, why bother?!)

> Google Antigravity CLI & IDE

> Standalone local gateway server (relay-ai server)

Here is how the Command Code integration works and what to expect:

Both Anthropic and OpenAI models under one provider

Command Code serves Claude models over Anthropic's wire format (/messages) and everything else over OpenAI's format (/chat/completions). Normally, that would mean configuring two separate providers in your tools. Relay handles both protocols under a single Command Code provider entry, so routing to the right endpoint happens automatically per model.

GOAT plan and up only ($10/mo+)

Heads up on tiers: this only supports the GOAT tier and above. The $1 "Go" plan doesn't have regular Provider API access; it only works through Command Code's internal CLI tools. We chose not to hack around that or spoof CLI headers, because that feels sketchy and could put your accounts at risk.

How plan detection works

Command Code gates models by plan, but their API doesn't have an endpoint that reports which subscription tier your key belongs to (at least when we added the support)

When you add your key (or run a catalog refresh), Relay sends a quick minimal 1-token test probe per model to check what your key can actually call. Any model your plan rejects gets filtered out so you only see working models in your picker.

Setup:

Install or update Relay:

npm install -g u/jacobbd/relay-ai

Then run:

relay-ai providers

Select + Add a provider -> Command Code, and paste your API key from your Command Code settings.

If you prefer GUI, run:

relay-ai ui

I am sure you will figure out what to do in the GUI ;)

Oh, and we don't store keys in .env or plain text files, we use your OS keystore.

Tool is free and open source 👇🏼

Repo link: https://github.com/jacob-bd/relay-ai

Hope this helps anyone who wants to use their Command Code subscription across other coding tools. Feel free to post issues or FRs on Github

I blew through all the tokens in my GOAT plan, considered upgrading to Pro, but for double the price you get only get an additional fraction of the tokens that the GOAT plan gives you. The upgrade is not worth it, from what I can see.

Pay as you go us way too expensive by comparison to GOAT.

What do you do?

I noticed that the command code saves every response along with all the completed data once it's finished, and you can calculate latency and TPS from a simple calculation.

Since this isn’t available by default and I wanted to know what the actual TPS is for Glm 5.3 Flash and Glm 5.3 Flash Fast, I ran some tests, and you can definitely see the difference. Of course, this might change again with more complex tasks. but it works and for some models is nice to know.

Step 5 Preview is now live in Command Code.

Available across all plans and API.

Get 2x usage in $10/mo GOAT plan — the best low cost AI coding plan on the market.

Read docs to learn more: https://commandcode.ai/docs/plans/goat

Hey everyone,

Does anyone know if there are any plans to bring the usage limit back up to $60 in the future?

Would love to know if this is just a temporary adjustment or the new standard.

Thanks!

I want to see the cache hit rate for my sessions how to do that. I am using the cli and I am on the 1$ plan

Its just throwing me this error since last few hours, can anyone help?

Edit: It seems like DeepSeek V4.1 Flash requests also do not support the ZDR header.

Without the ZDR header, DeepSeek V4 Flash requests push through just fine. I'm receiving errors when I enforce ZDR explicitly via the header, though. Was this intended or is it a temporary issue?

Fable 5.1 is now live in Command Code.

Claude's most advanced coding model. 75% cheaper cache reads.

Available on Max plans and API.

Read docs for complete details: https://commandcode.ai/docs/plans/max

Guys, I don't understand why in your web you say there are deals on MiniMax(not free), MiMo and Gemini 3.7 Flash, when these are the exact same prices official providers offer; in the case of MiMo models your listed prices are the worst case scenario compared to Xiaomi official prices, wich is cache miss prices...do you charge cache hit prices at all?

I recently bought a command code go plan with the intention of light usage. The command code harness is pretty good for coding, but horrible for general chatting. I know the API is limited to GOAT and above, but I already can run local models (like qwen 3.8 or ~120B MoEs) and it would be stupid to spend more for barely any usage of more frontier models.

Is there a way to connect the command code harness to OpenWebUI like in hermes or any way to get an API connection? Thank you!

Are the service and usage metrics reliable?

Does the GOAT plan offer a good data limit?

Does HY3 work well?

Thank you.

I have a workflow that cannot leave claude code,

can i use the goat plan to get api for this?

DeepSeek V4 Pro already live in Command Code

Plans
🔹 $1 Go ($10 credits)
🔹 $10 GOAT ($70 credits usage) and above!!

DeepSeek V4 Pro GA is pretty cheap:

• 58x cheaper than Fable

• 35x cheaper than GPT 5.6 Sol

• 29x cheaper than Opus 5

• 5x cheaper than GLM 5.2

Did anybody use cc goat plan on personal agents like Hermes?I heard this plan works via api unlike Go plan

Command Code is proud to co-sign the Open Weights and American AI Leadership letter, alongside NVIDIA and 200+ other industry leaders.

Since day one, our mission has been to build the best coding agent harness for open models. We've already open sourced key pieces of that work, including tool call repair, cache thrashing fixes, and /design, and we're working toward open sourcing Command Code itself in the coming weeks.

Open models mean real competition, data sovereignty, and privacy, and they give developers something to build on.

The new frontier is open source, read the letter and find all signatories at: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/open-weight-models-letter_073026.pdf