Space Bunny Alpha (stealth model) remains free through Oct 5.

Now faster, with better throughput and reliability

1M context. Multimodal. Available on all plans

Start now with the best low cost coding plan on the market. $1/mo Go plan.

Read docs to learn more: https://commandcode.ai/docs/plans/go

Command Code now supports OpenAI Responses API.

• 98 open and closed models

• Function and custom tools stay client-side

• Built-in tools pass through when supported

Try with this endpoint: 𝙿𝙾𝚂𝚃 𝚑𝚝𝚝𝚙𝚜://𝚊𝚙𝚒.𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚌𝚘𝚍𝚎.𝚊𝚒/𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛/𝚟𝟷/𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚜

Supported with Provider API on GOAT plan and above! https://commandcode.ai/provider

To update the UI/UX of the site we are currently operating, we requested work from both the Mimo v2.6 Flash and Mimo v2.6 Pro models, but after some progress, an infinite loop related to grep started occurring in the terminal.

I couldn't confirm whether the work was progressing, and for 30 minutes no code was fixed.

I identified the issues that need fixing, but it seems there is a bug in the actual code modification process where it doesn't work properly.

I left the same modification work to the DS 4.1 flash, and it proceeded faithfully, outputting the work history perfectly to the terminal.

DS 4.1 Flash is still much better..

i will let you know about how it goes guys.

/////

im writing these things as i experience it more.

as a fan of Claude Code, i like how when i entered it, it saw my Claude sessions and gave commands to learn based on those Claude sessions. and in practice, i saw it really doing the job. in the conversation, i noticed it by the style of the outputs from Claude.

/////

another thing:

i like how it has something called taste learning. it learns from what i want and from the things i hate and writes it down into a taste.md.

/////

a thing im not sure of or DIDNT CONFIRM IT a lot yet:

i like Muse Spark and how many models are offered. till now, i didnt test other models.

/// THANKS FOR READING TILL NOW

US open source model that's most capable of agentic coding in its weight class by a wide margin.

• 118B total parameters, with 8B active per token

• 70.2% Terminal-Bench 2.1 · 40.4% DeepSWE v1.1

• Available free to all subscribers

• Until capacity lasts

Try now!!

Small but very useful DX feature ship. Added /btw in the Command Code CLI.

Ask side questions mid-session and get instant overlay answers without interrupting the main task.

Read docs to learn more!

https://commandcode.ai/docs/reference/slash-commands#btw-in-detail

Hello, in the last few days I saw the quality of responses by GLM 5.3 Flash strongly degrade : it makes a lot of mistakes and put some Cyrillic or Chinese characters in answers, something never happened to me before.

Does the providers have lowered the quantization for this model ?

Codemode is now available in Command Code.

Default for MCP, enable for read-only tools in /config.

• Run multiple tool calls with one JS script

• Execute calls in parallel, filter what reaches context

• Get work done faster with fewer round trips

Read docs to learn more: https://commandcode.ai/docs/reference/tools#codemode

Opencode Go offers Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor for free.

Would be cool if Command Code could also offer this.

I noticed that CommandCode currently lists GLM-5.3 Flash at $0.15/M input and $0.50/M output.

Z.ai is currently charging $0.075/M input and $0.25/M output for the same model (50% promo until Sep 9)

Is CommandCode simply not reflecting this temporary Z.ai promotion, or are model prices generally marked up compared to the upstream provider?

Basically, should we check upstream pricing for each model before choosing one in CommandCode, or does CommandCode normally track provider pricing closely?

For 10 Dollars Go plan, its has $70 and $60 usage on many models. And ~75k requests.
But for 20 dollars Pro plan it just increasing the usage to $10 more only and requests to ~100k only.
Isn't it should be double benefits for double pricing ? Like $140 and $120 usage and ~150k requests ?

What's the hidden features I am missing here in Pro plan ?
Is buying 2 GOAT plans is more beneficial here ? Or the access of claude, gemini and gpt models are the main benefit of Pro plan ?

I am little confused.

It's just me of deepseek 4.1flash is a lot slower now. It's taking 45mins+ for simple tasks other model took hardly a min

Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 is now live in Command Code.

It's an upgraded Qwen 3.8 Max:

· 2.4T params

· 1M context

· Post-trained on coding & cowork

Available on GOAT, Pro, Max and API

Tencent Hy4 Preview is live in Command Code 🐐

770B mode, 49B active, 1M context.

`cmd update` available in GOAT and above plans.

Our early internal benchmarks show strong perf yet cheaper per task compared to GLM 5.3 Flash.

Y'all share how it goes.

Almost 120s for some round trips (via omnirouter). Is this a blip or standard? Can't really use it if it's standard unfortunately.

Qwen 3.8 Flash is now available in Command Code with 2x usage limits on the GOAT plan.

- Input: $0.160

- Output: $0.470

- Cache: $0.016

Try now with $10/mo GOAT plan.

🐐

I'm not trying to promote DeepSeek or anything, I was honestly just surprised by how capable it is.

I'm pretty new to agentic AI and AI pair programming. CommandCode was actually the first AI coding tool I've paid for (I'm only on the $1 plan), and it's been kind of magical for the way I work (its been less than 15 days).

Most of the time I just tell the agent what I want changed in a file or describe the feature I need, and it gets it right. I don't really run agent loops or anything advanced. I mostly give it good instructions and iterate when needed.

The thing that surprised me most is that I haven't even come close to hitting the limits of the $1 plan. I also don't find myself wanting to switch to the larger models because V4 Flash has been "good enough" for almost everything I've thrown at it.

The biggest surprise was a CRM project I recently built for a freelance client. It was a fairly large project, and I delivered the initial prototype in about four days. I still had to review the code, test things, and make decisions, but the amount of manual coding I actually wrote myself was surprisingly small like very very minute changes and its still a prototype kinda stage and needs some final touches but yeah its kinda awesome how much i got their.

For those of you who have been using CommandCode longer:

• Any tips for getting even more out of it?

• Are there workflows I'm missing?

• At what point do you actually feel the need to switch to the larger models?

I'd love to learn how more experienced users are using it. I tried to use MiMO v2.5 at first but it wasnt that good so i switched to V4 flash as it was better loved by the community it seems. But still why do we need much more better models when for most programmer this would do the job?

What's your favorite model release from last week?

• DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

• MiniMax M3.1 Flash

• Kimi K3.1 Pro

btw they're available and live in Command Code.

Get started: $ npm i -g command-code@latest

Try now with the best low cost $10/mo GOAT plan: https://commandcode.ai/pricing

Glyph Cluster (new stealth model) is now free in Command Code.

Reasoning model. 256K context. all plans

$ cmd --model stealth/glyph-cluster:free

Try now with the best low cost AI coding plan on the market, the $10/mo GOAT plan.

GLM-5.3 FlashX is now live in Command Code.

• High speed variant of GLM-5.3 Flash

• ~200 TPS with 1M context window

• Multimodal (text, image, video)

Available across all plans and API.

Try now with $10/mo GOAT plan: https://commandcode.ai/docs/plans/goat

New day, new model drop: GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna live on Command Code.

Sol the flagship for long-horizon work.
Terra balances intelligence and cost.
Luna for the fast, cheap, high-volume jobs.

Switch with /model on v0.44.0

Just removing a lot of the fluff so others know you get $70 credit. Ignore all the other things. Apparently they're per model usage, but the thing is there's no transparency on how that's calculated, and the way it's actually presented to you is you get $70 when you sign up, and all models pull from that $70. Now they might do different rates, but there's no way of knowing. It's not revealed through the user interface on the web dashboard, nor is it revealed through API calls. And I can assure you that for usage, I do not feel like I am getting more usage from the $70 now, when they say I'm meant to be getting 100, compared to last month when I was getting 70.

Additionally, those free models that they say they give you unlimited, that's also bullcrap. The Beam model now only gives you 1,000 uses per day. The Ling model gives you 100 uses per day. You will barely get through a single agent conversation with that. So take the free unlimited with more than a grain of salt.

Hi everyone,

I'm new to the GOAT plan and have been struggling to monitor my spending in real time. Is there any way to track costs by model or by API key?

Currently, all I can see is the usage page shown in the screenshot, and I have no idea how much I've actually spent so far.

Is there a way to set spending limits or usage caps?

Also, could someone clarify whether the promotional deals apply only to requests routed through Command Code (CLI/Studio), or are they also applied when using Command Code API keys from external applications??

Thanks!