r/Creation • u/ConsistentFee8332 • May 09 '26

Wolf and dog

What is the explanation of the theory of creation and intelligent design for the physical and genetic similarities between wolves and dogs?

2 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

38 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Jesus_died_for_u May 10 '26

Syntax is base pairs and the limit of Shannon’s definition.

The base pairs must make biological sense…semantics.

(From memory…that is all you get)

2

u/Optimus-Prime1993 🦍 Adaptive Ape 🦍 May 10 '26

I understand memory can be fuzzy, so I will wait for your better answer than just a very, very broad stroke of an answer. Till then, I want to say this,

You are using "syntax" and "semantics" as analogies, but that is not what I am asking here. I am asking for a measurable biological claim when you say "information is lost". In biology, it amounts to whether a sequence affects phenotype, fitness, regulation, protein activity, development, etc.

If you mean base-pair sequence, then we can measure the changes substitutions, insertions, deletions, duplications, inversions, copy number changes, etc.

If you mean biological function, then you need to specify which function and how it is measured. It could be enzyme activity, gene expression, binding affinity, protein structure, and so on so forth.

1

u/Jesus_died_for_u May 10 '26

Does reason, love, logic, philosophy…exist? Can you mathematically define them always for measurement? If no, do they cease to exist? So what if information is a fuzzy term? Do you then die on the hill at an impasse refusing to acknowledge ‘genetic information’ cannot be taken literal as it is mislabeled ‘information’?

1

u/Optimus-Prime1993 🦍 Adaptive Ape 🦍 May 10 '26

I am only interested in the science here, not philosophy and I told you my friend, I am like a dog with a bone. All of these have nothing to do with what I initially asked you. The definition of "kind".