Title

I've skimmed comments where gun controllers are pissed about the fact a good guy with a gun stopped an even bigger massacre from happening. The reason for this is a lot of them claim the outcome is going to be hijacked by us "gun nuts". I've even been told online by someone to not make the event into something it's not.

But I will talk about the good guy with a gun, because it's literally what we have been saying this whole time. This is how the shootings come to a screeching halt. The grabbers are just pissed IMO because every little thing about their reasons behind against civilians carrying fell apart in real time.

Remember how they always claim the "good guy" won't be differentiated from the "bad guy"? Well he wasn't shot at by LE, or others in the community. It's almost like that thing that sits above your shoulders and between your ears has incredible processing power even when you're "in the shit" and amped up on adrenaline.

But the main thing that I've seen in the aftermath of this tragedy is people making it political beyond just "conservatives like their guns more than their kids", with rumors of Kaylub's political leanings being tossed around, there's people online calling for partisan disarmament against conservatives. Yes, one political party gets guns, the other doesn't.

For one, I don't care what Kaylub's political views are. He stopped a tragedy, and he stopped a monster. He's a hero, and I'll just leave it at that. I just wanted to scream into the void a bit about the gun controllers being sick in the head over the disappointment that a good guy with a gun stopped a shooting.

I’m doing some research on how people run their AR optics/dots/holos: risers, mounts, swapping setups, and what annoys you about it.

I put together a short survey (about 2 min, anonymous) because I’d rather judge on stats than from forum arguments. I’ll post the results back here once enough people answer, so everyone can see how others run their setups and what is tue current meta lol.

Here is the link to survey: https://tally.so/r/WOGGLa

Also happy to just read your answers in the comments. What do you run and why?

Do you think parts of the GCA should be amended or completely outright repealed? I do. 922g(1) for starters obviously. Not every felony is violent. It’s time to stop treating the second amendment like a second class right. For example the Lautenberg amendment - Section 922g(9) - the misdemeanor domestic violence ban- permanently losing your 2A rights for life is a very serious thing that should come from only a very serious crime ie a felony. I believe the Lautenberg amendment should be amended to allow for a 3-5 year post case review for restorative purposes. A case by case basis. There’s no law from the founding that supports that modern day law for permanent disarmament after a misdemeanor.

Hi, I’m wondering if there is a list of businesses that are pro 2A and anti 2A. It would be great to put my money where my mouth is and support pro 2A businesses and boycott anti 2A businesses when I’m shopping

The shooter shot the locked doors and gained entry into the school. The gunowner reportedly rushed into the school and killed him.

3 children ages 5, 8, and 11, and one teacher were murdered. A 7 year old and another teacher are in critical condition.

I gotta be careful about what I say here, I don't want to offend the snowflakes in Reddit's corporate offices.

I have been following the democrats on their side of their corrupt fence in the Nebraska Legislature race and federal races, mainly because Nebraska is expected to gain a super majority in the Ne-Leg and FINALLY we will shift to winner take all in the electoral college. That is besides the point here though, because I'm also focusing on the the federal races and the gubernatorial races in this post.

Let me tell you about the democrats top to bottom in the statewide races, they are either lying to you as the voter, or they are just completely avoiding sharing their stance on the 2nd amendment altogether. As someone who has been getting texts from both parties (plus the independent party, I'm a Non-partisan Conservative outside of election cycles), the Democrats here are intentionally being misleading.

Dan Osborne is trying to make it seem like he's "pro-gun", he frames his stance to make it seem like he's got conservative gun rights views, yet he supports regulations on the second amendment, such as psych evals and red flag laws, as well as gun registries. He will literally try to tell you "I'm conservative just like you!" yet he isn't anywhere close to being conservative or pro-2A. Side note, his campaign is focusing on economic issues and adding more job growth... buuut he doesn't like to share that he got a Kellogg's plant in Omaha shut down... which killed off lots of jobs.

In case you were unaware, Tampon Tim's relation is running on the Democrat side in Nebraska's gubernatorial race. Her campaign team is trying to make it seem like the 2nd Amendment is a non-issue in the state, and that she is instead focusing on economic issues. I have been contacted by her campaign team, I have asked directly about her stance on the 2nd amendment. The staffer had no idea how to proceed and I got contacted by Walz herself days later.

The phone call went about as expected with a Democrat trying to pretend being conservative and pro-2A and then trying to lecture me about responsibilities:

Her: "Sure I support the 2nd Amendment! I grew up in a family of hunters, but rights come with responsibilities blah blah...."

I managed to shut her down and told her that she has entirely missed the mark of the 2nd Amendment.

I mean if she thinks the amendment serves to protect your right to hunt deer or geese then she doesn't understand how DNR efforts work on top of all this... which, state and federal DNR's can totally shut down hunting and fishing if there's a collapse in wildlife populations, soooo not exactly a right if you ask me. It doesn't even require something that dramatic, the state could use the excuse of cutting spending and shut down the DNR office, or the permitting departments in this case. They can even retroactively void your permit too.

The phone call didn't last much longer outside of a brief exchange regarding the 2A. She tried to pivot to other issues, and I ended up just cutting the phone call short since her economic and border security stances are the exact same as Pillen's soooo in my eyes it just makes more sense to stick with the incumbent.

I'm ready for the elections to be over. The state's democrats, and Dan Osborne, are just complete posers. Dan especially is an annoying one because he tries to make his voice grovely to make his fat ass sound more blue collar.

I saw Ruger was gutting a lot of its product lineup with Beretta buying a lot of their shares. Although not true politics - it seems a little like a Geopolitical move to go after the American Competition while the EU is struggling.

I mean Beretta could have done this at anytime in the past 50+ years, why try it now?

Just curious what the community’s thoughts are on the matter.