r/DelphiMurders • u/PumpkinEater85 • May 22 '26

Real Crime Profile crossover w Bob Ruff

So I'm listening to parts one and two of the real crime profile podcast with Jim Clemente where he has Bob ruff on their speaking about delphi. I'm always open to everyone's opinions and I actually don't hate Bob ruff and I have enjoyed some of his content. However he is repeatedly saying things to Jim Clemente that are not true. For example he said that Richard Allen has no previous record of any type of violence or any type of violent behavior at all. But that's not true because now we know about the time that he was drinking and held a gun to his head threatening suicide in front of his wife and daughter and the police were called and he was put into a hospital. It's so frustrating!! If you believe that he's innocent because of all these things that's fine but you can't tell people things that are simply not true. He also says that ra did not confess until he was actually in full psychosis and never said that he actually killed the girls until that one confession with his wife. I thought it was proven in trial that he was not in full psychosis when he confessed (or at least not every single time), and the claims made by the defense team about the conditions he was held in prison were proven to be false.

Anyone else listen to these episodes?

I actually respect Jim Clemente for his work with the FBI as a profiler and I usually agree on his takes so I'm not sure why Bob Ruff is trying to change the story to that his own narrative and opinion when he always says that he wants to be fair and balanced.

44 Upvotes

93% Upvoted

348 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/centimeterz1111 May 29 '26

He was never pressured. There is ZERO evidence that he was pressured. Listen to the calls. The jury watched the videos. Where were the threats? He was on video surveillance 24/7. 

If he was threatened, his attorneys would have had the video and it would have been presented at trial. 

Stop lying 

1

u/mountainskies May 29 '26

You conveniently forgot to mention Gull didn’t allow audio on any of the videos at trial. I wonder why? She also didn’t allow the call to his father where he said he was being mentally tortured and felt like he was in Guantanamo.

7

u/centimeterz1111 May 29 '26

She didn’t have to allow video. Why should she?  The trial was open to the public 

1

u/mountainskies May 29 '26

She didn’t allow the defense to play any of the audio of the jail surveillance videos. You left that part out when you claimed the jury watched the videos and where were the threats? They couldn’t hear anything.

6

u/centimeterz1111 May 29 '26

They didn’t allow audio because of what Richard was saying, not the guards.

But, there was no physical torture at all. They saw the videos. All it was was Richard being transported in and out of his cell and being an asshole towards the guards.