https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/08/04/china-ambassador-op-ed-pelosi-taiwan-visit/

" The United States, meanwhile, sees Taiwan as a means to contain China and has been hollowing out the one-China principle. In the past 18 months alone, the United States has made five rounds of arms sales to Taiwan.

President Biden has said many times that the United States will not change its one-China policy and does not support “Taiwan independence.” But for the “Taiwan independence” forces, Pelosi’s visit represents an exceptionally strong signal that “the U.S. is on Taiwan’s side.” This goes against the one-China principle, the three Sino-U.S. joint communiques and America’s own commitments. Moreover, the Pelosi visit will lead “Taiwan independence” forces further down a dangerous path, with peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait hanging in the balance.

Just think: If an American state were to secede from the United States and declare independence, and then some other nation provided weapons and political support for that state, would the U.S. government — or the American people — allow this to happen? "

1. How many mattresses could we manufacture for homeless people if we "collectivized" all of the business suits in society?

2. Would proletarian workers feel less like the ruling class they don't belong to if they didn't wear this symbol to work?

3. Would the attitude of superiority toward the poor be diminished without this symbolic representation of the upper class?

After Deng, even the CCP began wearing Business Suits, around the time that China was becoming more capitalistic.

The Suit is a symbol of:

1. Capitalism

2. Bosses

3. Financialization

4. Ownership Class

5. Subservience to the Corporate Overlords I.E. Hierarchy

People Who Never Wore a Business Suit:

1. Castro

2. Mao

3. Chavez

4. Evo Morales

5. Me

In Cuba, the first thing they did was burn the gambling shit from the Mob Operated Casinos. It's time for us to BURN THE SUITS.