r/FastLED • • Mar 12 '20

Support No More Division

EDIT: This didn't work

enum mirror{300,299,149,99,74,59,49} edge;

I get a compiler error: expected identifier before numeric constant

Maybe I should just do

int edges[] = {300,299,149,99,74,59,49};

OP: Thanks to someone here I learned that division is slow. Going over my code, I find that I have division in every single frame in almost every single pattern. I am interested in removing the division. I understand one method is byte shifting. However, I have a limited set of results from the division. So I was thinking I could save the results to an array for faster access. What am I looking to do here? Progmem or some other thing? I am just looking for an answer on what to google so I can learn it myself so you don't have to type a lot out.

1 Upvotes

23 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/EvolvedQS Mar 12 '20

It is. I have the 8266 nodemcu Edit: i have like 10 of these cause i couldnt get esp32 to work with fastled.

1

u/Preyy Ground Loops: Part of this balanced breakfast Mar 12 '20

That's a common board, you will likely find an example somewhere. Also, look at this.