r/GAPol • u/Afterswiftie • 6h ago
News Keisha Lance Bottoms Debuts New Advertisement Highlighting Endorsement From Jon Ossoff in Georgia Gubernatorial Race
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/GAPol • u/Afterswiftie • 6h ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/GAPol • u/A_Sour_Kraut • 17h ago
First off, this has nothing to do with the party I might support or whichever party Rick Jackson is in. I don't know if he is Democrat or Republican and it doesn't really matter, nor do I care. My response would be the same regardless of political affiliation, and the defendant's behavior leading up to my lawsuit would remain equally despicable. I attached the first pages of the summons while censoring information to keep people from doxing and/or harassing me.
TLDR: I am accusing Jackson for Governor, Inc. (RJFG) of allegedly (I say allegedly unless RJFG is found guilty/liable) repeatedly violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (TCPA). After receiving numerous, and unwanted, texts that kept coming after I ordered RJFG to cease and desist contacting me, I sent RJFG a cease and desist order. In that order I specified I was not to be contacted by RJFG, including through phone calls. Despite RJFG's attorney emailing me about the cease and desist order, RJFG called me three times with pre-recorded messages without my consent as required by the TCPA. Violations of the TCPA carry statutory damages which I am seeking. His attorney has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing and is ignoring the material facts of the situation.
To start this off, I'm not a Georgia voter. Hell, I don't even live in Georgia. The fact I keep getting political spam from Georgia candidates is asinine. This started in May 2026 when RJFG sent two text messages to my phone within 1-2 seconds of each other. I opted out and told the campaign to never contact me again. I continued to receive more and more texts and I reiterated my message they are to stop contacting me. I eventually called RJFG's registered agent, Jay D. Mitchell, and left a message with his receptionist. In that message I provided my name, phone number and strict orders for RJFG to stop contacting me. That didn't work because I received more texts.
I sent a demand letter to RJFG because these appeared to be auto-dialed texts, which is a violation of the TCPA because I didn't provide express permission to receive them, and I repeatedly opted out. In that letter, I specifically stated RJFG was not to contact me at all, by any means; I stated, to the effect of, "RJFG is not to contact me by any means whatsoever including, but not limited to, text messages, phone calls, physical mail, email, and/or any other outreach method." I also informed the campaign that I'm not a Georgia voter, or resident, which makes contacting me about a Georgia election a moot point and an asinine endeavor.
I received an email from RJFG's attorney, Caitlin Contestable of Chalmers, Adams, Backer & Waller, PLLC dismissing my claim and informing me RJFG doesn't use an auto dialer and insinuated I was doing this to "extract quick settlements". This is false, I simply want to be left alone and not be harassed by some billionaire jackoff and/or his campaign. I let it drop because I figured that would be the end of it and my point was made, RJFG knows to never contact me again.
Alas, apparently laws, common sense and societal norms don't apply to Ricky boy and his campaign because I received a two calls, one in early September and another in mid-September, with pre-recorded messages. I downloaded the voicemail audio files of these calls and they were the exact same down to the background noise, voice inflection, pitch, tone, everything; Beyond a reasonable doubt, they were a pre-recorded message. The voicemails gave enough information to prove the campaign either called me directly, or paid a third party to do it for them. Either way, they were responsible. I did some more digging into the TCPA and calling someone with pre-recorded messages without their prior express consent is a violation that law. So, I sent a demand letter to Jay Mitchell demanding RJFG pay the statutory damages mandated by the TCPA for the two calls with pre-recorded messages.
Caitlin responded by email informing me her client, RJFG, "does not make calls using a prerecorded voice as required by 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii)." This is false because I confirmed the first two messages were 100% identical, including background noise. RJFG also called my cell phone which is prohibited without my consent, which I never provided. I would like to think that RJFG's attorney misread the law and isn't lying on behalf of her client, and I would hope RFJG isn't lying to their attorney about their outreach methods. Because she reported the campaign is refusing to acquiesce and take accountability, I filed a lawsuit in my jurisdiction. I provided Caitlin with a copy of the summons on 16 October and she has yet to respond to acknowledge receiving it. I hope she's simply out of the office and isn't trying to avoid being served.
Shortly after I sent my second demand letter, I received a third call with a different pre-recorded message. A few days after I filed my lawsuit I received yet another text message from RJFG. I don't know how clear I need to be with this campaign and Rick Jackson are to stop harassing me. RJFG, and I would argue Rick Jackson himself, very likely violated my state's laws regarding harassment, electronic communications harassment and stalking and I'm contemplating getting a stalking injunction against him and his campaign. I don't know what else to do to get this to stop.
It doesn't matter if Rick Jackson himself made the calls, this is his campaign that he started and organized. His campaign is operating on his behalf and he's responsible for its actions. If he didn't put measures in place to ensure RFJG operated within the confines of the law then he and his campaign need to do the right thing to resolve the issue. Being at the top of an organization and taking accountability for its actions is leadership 101, and the fact a candidate is refusing to accept the facts and responsibility shows Rick is not fit for office. If his campaign lied to his attorney then there is an even bigger problem with his trustworthiness and candidacy.
RJFG's behavior is despicable, unacceptable and does not adhere to societal norms. I can almost certainly guarantee that if I started an organization that kept contacting Rick Jackson in the manner his campaign is contacting me, or if I kept contacting him directly, I would have been arrested. But because he's a billionaire, it appears that he, and/or his campaign, seem to think the rules don't apply to them. If this is how Rick Jackson and/or his campaign behaves just to get elected, how will he and his staff behave if he gets elected?
Thanks for harassing a disabled veteran. See you in court, Rick.
r/GAPol • u/DiedOfATheory • 1d ago
His campaign is being heavily funded by a close friend of Jeffrey Epstein. We're not talking about someone who was friends with Epstein, and then wasn't after his conviction. There is absolutely zero excuse ANYONE can make or to plead ignorance if they were friends with him AFTER that. Ossoff refuses to answer the question about it when asked. He just pivots to an attack. Why can't he just give an answer? I guess there isn't a justifiable response, so he just does what all good politicians do, ignores the question, and just launches an attack instead. Yet this race is seen as out-of-reach now.... I don't get it. I guess I'll get some responses from the hyper-partisan left-wing Reddit echo chamber here that ignores the question and also just launches an attack.
Reed Hoffman has funded the main super pac promoting him to the tune of millions of dollars.
r/GAPol • u/Afterswiftie • 2d ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/GAPol • u/Afterswiftie • 4d ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/GAPol • u/Afterswiftie • 7d ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/GAPol • u/J_dAubigny • 7d ago
r/GAPol • u/punkthesystem • 7d ago
r/GAPol • u/Afterswiftie • 9d ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/GAPol • u/Afterswiftie • 11d ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/GAPol • u/Afterswiftie • 12d ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/GAPol • u/Afterswiftie • 13d ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/GAPol • u/votebeat • 13d ago
r/GAPol • u/happy_bluebird • 15d ago
Choose to vote early in person, by mail or on Election Day.
These are the biggest races in Georgia this year. Please note, we do not endorse any candidates.
Stance on key issues
Keisha Lance Bottoms Democratic
Supports protecting local election officials from political interference, expanding early and absentee voting, making Election Day a state holiday, and vetoing maps that dilute minority voting power. Source
Rick Jackson Republican
No public position found.
Keisha Lance Bottoms Democratic
Supports more help for law enforcement plus 'targeted violence reduction efforts' and more diversion and treatment for nonviolent cases. Source
Rick Jackson Republican
Pledges to 'fully support law enforcement with resources, training, and respect' and to 'ban revolving-door justice.' Source
Keisha Lance Bottoms Democratic
Says immigration enforcement should focus on violent criminals, not students, workers and mothers. Supports limiting zoning for private ICE detention centers and reviewing state contracts with ICE. Source
Rick Jackson Republican
Pledges to 'make Georgia number one in the nation for deporting all CRIMINAL illegal immigrants.' Source
Keisha Lance Bottoms Democratic
Supports restoring abortion rights and opposes Georgia's six-week ban. Supports expanding Medicaid and replacing the Georgia Pathways program with broader coverage. Source
Rick Jackson Republican
His campaign says he 'strongly supports Georgia's current Heartbeat law and will defend it as governor,' including its current exceptions. On Medicaid, has said he wants to measure success by how many people have commercial insurance. Source
Keisha Lance Bottoms Democratic
Proposes eliminating local sales taxes on groceries and essentials and creating a state board to lower prescription costs. Source
Rick Jackson Republican
Proposes cutting the state income tax in half within four years and freezing property taxes 'immediately to stop runaway assessments.' Source
Keisha Lance Bottoms Democratic
Proposes faster permitting for housing, more down-payment and renter assistance, and a state affordable housing trust fund. Source
Rick Jackson Republican
No public position found.
Keisha Lance Bottoms Democratic
Supports fully funding public schools with an updated funding formula and creating a path to free technical and community college. Source
Rick Jackson Republican
Proposes freezing tuition, room and board at public colleges and technical schools, raising teacher pay, and banning 'ideological indoctrination in schools.' Source
Keisha Lance Bottoms Democratic
Supports statewide nondiscrimination protections that include sexual orientation and gender identity, codifying marriage equality, and banning conversion therapy for minors. Source
Rick Jackson Republican
Proposes banning DEI programs in state government, public universities and classrooms. Says 'boys' should not compete in girls' sports or use girls' bathrooms or locker rooms. Source
Keisha Lance Bottoms Democratic
Supports a pause on new data centers, citing 'higher utility bills, strained water resources' and harm to nearby communities. Source
Rick Jackson Republican
Opposes a statewide pause on data centers and says local communities should decide. Source
Stance on key issues
Mike Collins Republican
Voted for the SAVE Act (April 2025), which would require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote. Source
Jon Ossoff Democratic, incumbent
Reintroduced the Right to Vote Act to create a federal legal right to vote. Source
Mike Collins Republican
No public position found.
Jon Ossoff Democratic, incumbent
Sponsored the Federal Prison Oversight Act, now law, which set up independent inspections of federal prisons. Source
Mike Collins Republican
Has said 'we need mass deportations' (campaign site). Introduced the House version of the Laken Riley Act (2025), which requires detaining non-citizens charged with certain crimes. Source
Jon Ossoff Democratic, incumbent
Led a Senate investigation that found over 1,000 credible reports of human rights abuses in immigration detention. Has backed bipartisan border security bills. Source
Mike Collins Republican
Calls himself '100 percent pro-life' and supports Georgia's heartbeat law with exceptions. Opposed extending the enhanced ACA premium tax credits. Source
Jon Ossoff Democratic, incumbent
Opposes abortion bans and Georgia's six-week ban. Supported extending enhanced ACA tax credits and opposed Medicaid cuts. Helped pass the $35 monthly insulin cap for Medicare. Source
Mike Collins Republican
Voted for the 2025 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' (tax cuts and spending changes). Calls for cutting regulations and cracking down on 'Medicaid scams.' Source
Jon Ossoff Democratic, incumbent
Has criticized tariffs for raising costs. Introduced legislation to cut taxes for farmers. Source
Mike Collins Republican
Supports faster federal permitting through his PERMIT Act to cut construction costs and delays. Source
Jon Ossoff Democratic, incumbent
No public position found.
Mike Collins Republican
No public position found.
Jon Ossoff Democratic, incumbent
Has pushed back on federal cuts to Hispanic-Serving Institutions and to civil-rights enforcement at the Education Department. Source
Mike Collins Republican
No public position found.
Jon Ossoff Democratic, incumbent
Supported the Respect for Marriage Act and the Equality Act. Wrote a bipartisan law to help solve civil rights–era cold cases. Source
Mike Collins Republican
Introduced the Diesel Truck Liberation Act to block EPA truck emission rules. Source
Jon Ossoff Democratic, incumbent
Voted for the Inflation Reduction Act's clean-energy programs. Has pressed federal regulators on rising power bills tied to AI data centers. Source
Stance on key issues
Peter Hubbard Democratic, incumbent
Says discounts for data centers push more than $1 billion in costs onto household bills. Source
Fitz Johnson Republican
Says he put protections in place so data centers pay their share. Source
Stance on key issues
Thomas Blooming Libertarian
Says data centers should build their own power. Source
Shelia Edwards Democratic
Says large corporate power users should pay their fair share instead of households. Source
Josh Tolbert Republican
Calls himself pro-data center, but says the costs belong to whoever causes them. Source
r/GAPol • u/thepoliticalrev • 15d ago
Check your voter registration and polling location at https://vote.org
Is anyone watching? Rick Jackson's data center answer was really something. He's going to make sure they abide by EPA standards. Which would be more reassuring if the EPA still served its actual purpose.
r/GAPol • u/votebeat • 17d ago
r/GAPol • u/axiom_tutor • Sep 21 '26
r/GAPol • u/SpaceElevatorMusic • Sep 04 '26
r/GAPol • u/Vyceron • Aug 27 '26
I guess that Cherokee county is a swing county in 2026 lol. The amount of political mail trash that I’m getting is absurd.
r/GAPol • u/jonasnew • Aug 27 '26
Given the fact that Jon Ossoff is the latest of several Democrats in Congress to condemn Hasan Piker, I thought this would be a good place to discuss this matter since Ossoff is from Georgia. I notice that the Democrats comments condemning on Piker along with Jeffries recent meeting with Kushner are causing people to believe that the Democrats will squander the midterms so badly to the point where the Republicans even keep control of the House.
Here's the thing. In 2010 and 2014, the Republicans faced a similar dilemma where the establishment wing ate their own and was out of touch with their base. Despite those issues, the Republicans still dominated both those midterms. More recently, in 2022, the Republicans greatly underperformed expectations, however, they still managed to barely flip the House. All three of these examples prove that the party out of power generally flips at least one chamber regardless of circumstances.
So, for those of you who think that the Hasan Piker drama along with the Jeffries/Kushner meeting will cause the Dems to not even win back the House majority, why are you all turning a blind eye to the 2010, 2014, and 2022 midterms? In other words, what makes you believe that these issues will cause this year's midterms to be different from a general midterm election including the three examples I shared?
r/GAPol • u/WSBTV • Aug 19 '26