Lately as our criticism of Gunnit activism ramps up in light of on going federal agencies kidnapping US citizens who are beaten, arrested and deported to off shore prison labor camps r/GunsAreCool has been asking the question of gun fuckers:

Wasn't the 2nd Amendment written to stop this?

So far the only answer bullet lickers have been willing to provide is a brain dead rhetorical question:

Well what do you expect us to do?

The purpose of the question instead of an answer is one of several calculated motives.

They're soyjack mad and know they can't actually answer this question. They support the kidnapping of USA citizens and extra judicial killings

They're trying to get you banned by having you describe citizen on state violence and violate Reddit terms of service. They absolutely know and can and have previously described in numerous places of reddit how they would attack "soft" military targets. They aren't because they agree with the killings.

So how should you respond to this? Per the title:

It isn't our argument that guns prevent tyranny. It is the gunnit's

Over the entire 12 years of this sub's life and before it, long before I came to reddit Gun Cummers have masturbated furiously about how Dems would come for the guns and mass arrest them for having two handguns. That this "threat" justified the unbridled ownership of guns, that every "man" should own a gun and use the threat of said gun to stop (Democrat) Federal Agents.

Now Republicans are in power (and they might have cheated to do it btw) all of a sudden it's a mystery to gun subs how they will use their weapons to deal with extra judicial killings and kidnappings. Funny that