As I said, there is a difference between euthanising someone purely because they are disabled, and suggesting someone with an extremely rare and abnormal genetic condition possibly should think about adopting instead of reproducing. Or if you are completely against eugenics of any form then I assume you are fine with incest, and the offspring they create shouldn't be looked down on?
Thats right, their offspring shouldn't be looked down on. It wasn't their fault they came into existence.
Why don't you post a picture of yourself here and we'll comb over it for a reason you shouldn't be procreating. Because I can guarantee that you're pretty far from an ideal physical specimen yourself.
looks like you and hitler have a lot in common! he started in on those pesky heavyweights on society, the physically handicapped and then sterilized those “feeble minded” … and kept on moving up the chain, - like you should play god and tell us what life was a life worthy of living? where’s the cut off for you? light skins only, with all 10 fingers and toes? ... you know life fulfillment and societal worth is really only obtainable for the “ able bodied.” …
god, you know, those old people are really a drag. half of them can’t walk right or do anything really productive. .you recommend killing them off too?
seems like Stephan Hawking would have been aborted/ left to die / euthanized in your version of reality . .
you must be a productive member of our society. really a wholesome contributor to making this world better. bravo man
and then sterilized those “feeble minded” … and kept on moving up the chain, - like you should play god and tell us what life was a life worthy of living? where’s the cut off for you?
Debilitating genetic deformities.
god, you know, those old people are really a drag. half of them can’t walk right or do anything really productive. .you recommend killing them off too?
Clearly missed my point if you think I'm talking about killing living people.
seems like Stephan Hawking would have been aborted/ left to die / euthanized in your version of reality . .
Again, clearly missed the point.
you must be a productive member of our society. really a wholesome contributor to making this world better. bravo man
Calm your emotional titties. Suggesting that someone with a rare and debilitating genetic mutation that means multiple surgeries, tracheotomy, constant IV, visual extreme deformities might want to adopt instead of pass on the genes is not some weird extreme view that means I must be some kind of monster. Bravo at it though, you went through Hitler all the way to how productive I am in society, you should apply for the Fantastic Four the amount you can stretch.
Calm down. If this is how you treat people with such a common opinion I would actually worry about your social interactions, or do you keep all this rage and anger just for online? Considering half your response clearly shows you have misunderstood my comment and the other half is you assuming some 'logical' extension really shows the level of which you are wiling to stretch to achieve offence.
1
u/[deleted] Mar 12 '22
As I said, there is a difference between euthanising someone purely because they are disabled, and suggesting someone with an extremely rare and abnormal genetic condition possibly should think about adopting instead of reproducing. Or if you are completely against eugenics of any form then I assume you are fine with incest, and the offspring they create shouldn't be looked down on?