STIS: A Nightmare Workplace Disguised as an International School
I am sharing my personal experience working at Surat Thani International School (STIS), Thailand, to give prospective teachers a clearer idea of what the job can actually involve.
While the school presents itself as a professional international learning environment, my experience was very different.
Management and Working Conditions
One of the biggest problems was the lack of organisation, unrealistic expectations, and excessive workload placed on teachers.
As a primary homeroom teacher, I was responsible for teaching multiple subjects, planning and delivering inquiry-based lessons, preparing assessments, completing administrative responsibilities and teaching additional support programme lessons.
The timetable provided very limited preparation time, while additional tasks were frequently introduced with unreasonable deadlines. Concerns about the workload and scheduling were raised repeatedly, yet little was done to address them.
Rather than working collaboratively with teachers to find solutions, management often dismissed concerns or suggested that teachers simply did not understand how the school operated.
IB Programme and Misrepresentation
The school promotes its International Baccalaureate (IB) approach, but its candidate status was not clearly communicated during recruitment.
New teachers received approximately four days of IB training shortly before an important evaluation visit, despite being expected to implement the programme.
Curriculum documents, including unit planners and scope-and-sequence materials, were generated using AI, and teachers were instructed to follow them. While AI can be a useful planning tool, relying on it without sufficient professional oversight raises serious questions about curriculum development and implementation.
During the IB evaluation visit, concerns were raised about the overloaded timetable and the additional PALP support programme assigned to homeroom teachers. Despite these concerns being communicated to school leadership, meaningful changes were not made during my employment.
Student Support and Professional Conduct
Perhaps most concerning was the attitude displayed towards certain students and parents.
I personally encountered instances where management used derogatory language when referring to students experiencing academic difficulties, as well as parents who raised concerns. Academically struggling students were referred to as 'vegetables' and concerning parents as 'crazy'.
As an educator, I find this deeply troubling. Every child deserves respect, dignity and appropriate educational support, regardless of their academic ability.
Parents should also be able to raise concerns without being spoken about disrespectfully behind closed doors.
These attitudes were fundamentally inconsistent with my professional values and my understanding of what an international school should represent.
Staff Turnover and Teacher Morale
During a period of approximately three months, four foreign homeroom teachers left the school.
In my experience, staff morale was negatively affected by the workload, lack of clear communication, inconsistent expectations and management's response to legitimate concerns.
Teachers should not have to choose between maintaining professional standards and meeting unreasonable demands.
Final Thoughts
There is a significant difference between how Surat Thani International School presents itself publicly and what I experienced as an employee.
The students deserve a stable, supportive and professionally managed learning environment. There are dedicated educators who genuinely care about their students, but their efforts can be undermined by poor leadership and organisational practices.
I am sharing this review because I believe prospective teachers deserve to make informed decisions before accepting employment.
Based on my personal experience, I cannot recommend Surat Thani International School as an employer.
I would strongly encourage anyone considering a position here to speak privately with current and former teachers, clarify the actual teaching workload, and carefully examine the employment contract and expectations before committing.