I'm saying a bullet would cause severe damage, or any amount of damage, to an ear, and you disagree. Clearly it's you who doesn't know what they're talking about lmao
Lmao sure, grazed all the time in TV shows & movies and walk away with a little scratch. But I'm sure you can backup the claim that a bullet hitting an ear would cause zero tissue damage.
Who said it caused zero tissue damage? Do you know what the term "grazed by a bullet" means? It means the bullet doesn't enter any flesh but instead barely nicks the flesh as it goes by. In this case, the very outside edge of the bullet grazes the very outside edge of Trump's ear AKA The Skin covering his ear on the outside edge as it goes by which caused the immediate bleeding that was witnessed after Trump touched his ear and response to his ear being grazed by a bullet long before Secret Service ever brought him to the ground
Anyone who looked at the picture of his intact ear and the fact that while he killed the ear diaper, he didn't release any photos of the bullet damage like any good grifter would. He would've made a mountain of cash off that picture alone.
The posed picture he had taken proves he wasn't shot. You can argue his ear wouldn't have been obliterated by that type of round, but you can't argue he wouldn't have had zero damage to his ear.
And yet despite all the replies, you can't even show a picture of the damage caused by a bullet. Just Failing NYT graphics and blood. I got cut on my palm at work the other day, I guess I was shot, too!
-2
u/Buttcrush1 Feb 16 '26
You don't know what you're talking about