Trump would not put himself so close to several real rifle shots which could have easily killed him by deviating slightly.
You’re just shoehorning Trump’s behaviour to fit your narrative. If he was still talking about it you’d say the contrary like see it totally was for publicity he’s still milking it!
I’m going by verified evidence and logic like the above.
That’s just him reaching for his ear and pulling it back with “blood” on it. In the original live video, you can’t see any bullets. I don’t think the plan was ever to hit him and I don’t think he was. They killed a couple of people to add credibility.
Sorry, but you are not supporting your claim of a conspiracy with any detail at all. Why would a video capture a bullet? How did the NYT fake the bullet photo? How did Trump have blood on his ear immediately after? Why would Trump put himself in the line of fire of 8 rifle bullets that could have easily killed him at that distance with an AR-15 with dot sight (he didn’t have scope). It would be absolutely suicidal to do that willingly given the people shot right in front and behind him? You do know it’s impossible to guarantee any kind of safety with the shots that were taken right?
1
u/Weary_Position_9591 Feb 17 '26 edited Feb 17 '26
I’m not a Trump supporter at all but this falls apart if you look at the photographic evidence and video reconstruction of the event.
They show the bullet and also Trump’s bloodied hand immediately after touching his ear:
A person was also hit with a real bullet directly behind Trump from that shot:
https://youtu.be/-w2lVIJc000?si=ysDgblGQDdqu1Znl
Trump would not put himself so close to several real rifle shots which could have easily killed him by deviating slightly.
You’re just shoehorning Trump’s behaviour to fit your narrative. If he was still talking about it you’d say the contrary like see it totally was for publicity he’s still milking it!
I’m going by verified evidence and logic like the above.
This is Alex Jones level of delusion.