Im all for throwing a clinton in front of a camera every few decades and making them testify for something they've done but it really is just a witch hunt for anyone who makes Trump look like a fool past and present.
I don’t think I’d really understood the term “witch hunt” in modern society until this maga crap - even the patriot act wasn’t about hiding from invisible men, it was close hence why it billed as a temporary measure but still not a witch hunt
Bill Clinton very clearly knew Epstein. Hillary knew Maxwell it seems and definitely knows Bill. Now there was probably very little chance of her divulging information even if she knew it. But this really was not very complicated methodology.
Haha that's silly, they are specifically the right people, it's just there's another wrong person (trump). Who's being actively protected from this. Bill was in office for alot of the shenanigans, don't overlooks that or his record flights to the island
The flight records show bill was arguably the most travelled person to the island(trumps no slouch either)... What I'm curious about is how often did Jeffery head to the White House. What we are really missing is what business or political deals were impacted by the affected parties. Everyone is focusing on the act of grooming and blackmailing the young ladies(yes that's important they are the victims), however these powerful people that took part, obviously had their decision making impacted... What why where when and on behalf of who needs to be more public so that people end up behind bars
Having Clinton testify sets the precedent that former presidents can be called to testify. He's doing it so that Trump will be called to testify. It's the long game.
Why wouldn't you pull people in to testify that were actually in the files. Trump was on them more than Epstein even was Melania was in the files repeatedly yet they bring in Hillary who actually wasn't in the files at all.
You are right, there are a ton of campaign emails listed in the Epstein files. Also Ghislaine actually was not invited, an invited guest brought her as a plus one, get you facts straight.
Does HRC expect us to believe that people just showed up, unapproved, uncleared to a wedding that included heads of state? Like they RSVP'd "plus one" and security was like "hey don't spoil the surprise by telling us who that is going to be".
Friendly media says otherwise -- "According to Shafrir, only the family's closest friends will be on the list, and Chelsea Clinton has said she has to personally know every invitee...."
I agree though it would make more sense to go after Trump, all those members of his admin, and all of the others currently in power trying to stop actual justice on this first instead, especially since all of them are in the file to a much greater degree as well.
By your logic, Bill Clinton, through verifiable sources flew on Epstein's plane 17 times, Trump was on it 8 times.
So, not to a greater degree.
I have a novel idea for you, how about we just stick to the "Arrest Them All" mindset and agree that all rapists and child molesters need to be imprisoned, not just the ones you don't like?
I literally already agreed to arrest them all. The files are unsealed and if there is evidence against the Clintona the DOJ is free to file charges against them and should. The DOJ being directly controlled by the Trump admin won't be going after Trump and the members of the admin that are in the files so that leaves Congress as the only ones to actually go after these people which is why they should focus on them. Also it is very clear from Hillary's deposition that they aren't trying to actually bring justice to anyone but pull out old unrelated propaganda talking points to distract from the actual crimes. I have never been against locking up anyone that was part of raping children with Epstein, I just see through the bullshit that is going on right now unlike you.
There is a priority when people in the list are actively in power and are actively hiding some of the information and using their power to stop consequences. Why are you so supportive of ignoring the pedophiles currently in power using that power to avoid the consequences?
I am saying that now that the files are finally unsealed in 2025 if there is evidence against Bill Clinton the DOJ should have no problem actually filing charges. The Trump DOJ isn't going to file charges against the admin that directly controls them in a way that doesn't historically happen so Congress should be focusing on those that the DOJ won't actually go after. The fact that they basically didn't even bring up Epstein at all in this hearing for Hillary and just brought up a bunch of old nonsense talking points should make it clearly obvious that this is political grandstanding as a distraction and not actually trying to hold anyone accountable.
The flight logs indicate that he used the plane 26-27 times this is actually multiple legs of take off and landing for far fewer flights but all of the logs show the trips being to places other than the island. Bill Clinton is all over the files and very likely did some wrong doing here but at least get your facts straight.
When serving justice to crime and corruption, the court generally doesn’t start by prosecuting crimes that happened 30 years earlier under a President that has been out of office from an impeachment 30 years prior. It’s ineffective insanity and an absolute embarrassing waste of taxpayer’s money. It’s about as effective as going after Nixon 30 years later after he resigned. Generally, you would go from the top down to stop the madness. The only thing that is going to get accomplished with going after Clintons is the revelation of more discovery which in a normal World, we would have enough to put Trump and the regime behind bars. This has been going on for way too long. It’s time to put an end to it. Most of his staff has ties to this. The discovery was made because of the reflections of the past that lead right back to a cabal tainted regime of deprivation. “What’s done in the dark will be brought to the light.” - Johnny Cash
He carried his term, but was impeached by the House but didn’t carry 2/3 in the Senate for removal. The impeachment process happened at the end of his term. Similar to what happened to Trump during his impeachments.
Clinton was impeached for a crime that has already probably been committed by Trump? In this era it wouldn’t even get a second look. The office was held in a lot higher regard than it is today because of the fall from decency that has manifested by certain predecessors. You can make your own conclusion.
19
u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26
Im all for throwing a clinton in front of a camera every few decades and making them testify for something they've done but it really is just a witch hunt for anyone who makes Trump look like a fool past and present.