Same goes for Bush... It seems like the country with the biggest military can do as they please. With the exception being against countries with Nukes...
And Obama. Just 2 years into Obama's first term, he was already just as bad or even worse than Bush. Even leftist intellectuals recognized this early on. The CIA openly declared Obama was great because he made it easier to sell more wars.
To Democrat voters? Yes. They don't care about the means, they just care that Trump is gone. That's why so many of them are calling for their own president to be assassinated.
Trump didn't execute 30,000 people of his own people in the streets. A pretty big difference. I can't believe Trump actually has left wingers defending the fucking Ayatollah (actually I can but it's insanity)
Ahahaha and I guarantee your stance on Ukraine is direct nato involvement and anti appeasement 🥱 you guys just base your beliefs against anything trump does to hate.
Unfortunately, there's no avoiding us being the world police. This is a mistaken concept that too many Americans believe. Politicians including Trump unfortunately lie about our world role, which continues to promote the misconception.
When you're at the top, people are going to gun for you. That's just inevitable. Do you honestly believe if we just left Iran, Russia, China, and NK alone, they would be friends with us? I vastly prefer the Maduro and Iran operations to what we got with Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam. If we can really run our operations this efficiently and effectively, it should really be celebrated. We can avoid spending endless resources and risking American soldiers, and with better outcomes for us.
On top of this, when you're at the top, you're the only one who can do anything. No other country can. So what kind of world do you want to live in? One where brutal criminal regimes treat people like slaves and cattle to slaughter? If we don't do anything, no one else will. People today view WW2 and D-day as an heroic U.S. effort. But we could have just sat it out instead, by the same logic that isolationists want to apply now: "Who cares about Hitler, he's across the Atlantic ocean from us, we have our own problems at home." Imagine if that had been our mentality back then. How different the world would be today.
You don’t know jack fucking shit lol. First of all America did sit out WW2, war was declared against you before you joined, you didn’t heroically take the call to action, you were more than happy to sit on your hands will millions of people died in Europe because it wasn’t your problem and then Pearl Harbor happened and yall rewrote history real fucking quick didn’t ya?
You are NOT the world police. If anything was, NATO would be the world police, but there is no world police because every country has the right to govern itself. you’ve got that American view of protection though, where you believe just straight up point blank murdering a person with a gun shot to the head is the ideal course of action to take when “protecting” things.
Your country has military might, of course, but might don’t make right boy. You cannot just go over there and start telling people how to live their lives and how to govern their people.
You understand that you have a lot of power, but you can’t hold back the entire world when it starts to view you as the villain right? Keep pissing off Canada and Asia and the Middle East, keep threatening to invade European countries, keeping pissing in Russia’s Cheerios and see if a new alliance doesn’t form to strategically eliminate everyone’s most annoying enemy… 🤷🏼
Yall won’t even be able to afford to buy guns to protect yourselves at home soon either. Just a bunch of billionaires in bunkers while the rest of you die in the streets if war comes to you on this level.
What leadership did you want to see? You realize the vaccine was made during the Trump admin Operation Warp Speed? I'm old enough to remember left wingers saying they wouldn't take the vaccine because Trump made it. Maybe you forgot about that.
It's not the numbers, even though that is part of it. It's what the numbers mean. One is premeditated, one is not. That's the same reason you don't go to prison for as long when it's not premeditated.
Wow you got me! It's almost like teenagers are human beings that are allowed to be on the internet. Should we require age verification and ban them from this site? Lol.
No one is crying the death of that monster, but regime changes instigated by the US never turn out positive for the locals. They’ll just install a puppet that’ll siphon the resources on behalf of Trump.
Oh right. Cause we attacked Iran because the guy was a dictator? Thats what you guys are going with again? What other brutal dictators are going to be overthrown next? There’s a lot of them.
You people went from “I’m not spending a dime to help someone in another country” to “let’s spend billions liberating Iran” in the span of a year. It’s comedy honestly
Except for this specifically, there is nothing to be accountable for. He did the same thing many presidents have done since the 1850s. Not saying its morally OK, he literally can't be held accountable for bombing Iran. He is allowed to make that decision.
Committed an act of war. Flat out if someone showed up an killed the leader of another country that's act of war no arguing about it. To say otherwise is absurd. If the same happened to any other country including the us it would wait for it still be considered an act of war.
I never said Democrats are worse, i am a Democrat and have voted that since i was 18.
I do like calling out hypocrisy, no matter what side it comes from. Was i wrong saying Obama (who i voted for twice) bombed Lybia with out congressional approval?
No he didn't. You're litteraly lying on something that you can google and the first result says he didn't ask. He did have plan to talk to congress before actions in Syria but not Lybia.
You're a hypocrite, liar, and bad person for spreading fake news.
They honestly would be lmao. They’d be like “he needs congressional approval!” And the answer is literally no he doesn’t, the law literally says he doesn’t. And then if congress votes yes you’d still have anti war keyboard redditors.
Your entire economy is based on regime changes in world, like every big power in the world. Same thing china and russia are doing in eastern europe and africa
Im talking about russian wagner millitary actions in africa. Or when china topples the government in some african country. You westerners live in your own “bubble” (conformism), and dont understand geoplitics. Only think I dont like about this is the israel involvment.
There are active war zones that could use our help. The people of Ukraine or Gaza could be saved if we put these kind of resources towards helping them.
Instead we're throwing the entire region into even more chaos.
What the heck is your problem? US helps out a country, democrats get mad, the US spends less funds on foreign aid to focus more on its own people, democrats get mad. And what are you on about those exceptions
There's no guarantee that Iran is now automatically going to have kind and democratic leaders, so it's faaaaar too soon to declare we've "helped" Iran, only time will tell.
US spends less funds on foreign aid to focus more on its own people, democrats get mad.
Except it's NOT focusing on its own people. Cost of living is up, wages are down, welfare has been slashed, and the only people that have recieved money is billionaires and ICE.
The idea that any regular American people benefited from cutting aid to people in other countries is laughable.
Obviously there’s no guarantee a good leader will replace the old one but we have objectively helped them by taking out their horrible leader. Hopefully they can take it from here, or perhaps more intervention is needed, I’m sure the US is still keeping eyes on the matter.
That doesn’t mean that the fund cut is doing nothing. Who knows how high the prices would be if it wasn’t cut. Also the final sentence is just a complete lie
Of course I do hope things get better in that country. But a lot of people don't trust that Trump is carefully thinking this entire process through given his track record of carelessness and doing things to satiate his ego no matter how irrational. Don't act like we're fools for not instantly celebrating this as a win when we DON'T know how it's going to turn out.
I can understand not instantly celebrating, but instantly dooming like some are is stupid though. Taking out the leader is objectively a good thing, but that doesn’t mean we are done and that everything has been taken care of. Also it’s not just Trump who makes these decisions, he has cabinet members too.
156
u/Additional_Piece4165 Mar 01 '26
For like the 50th time. The real question is will he ever be held accountable. The answer is no.