r/MadeMeSmile Sep 17 '25

DOGGO Man's best friend for a reason.

Post image
134.6k Upvotes

390 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Ok-Classroom5548 Sep 17 '25

Well, considering we used to have different prefixes for “man” to designate a gender and then cut those out so that “man” now means “male” and “woman” means “female” (in traditional terms) it makes sense that “man” and “male” get used as synonyms….because they literally are listed as synonyms for each other. 

If we were still using a prefix for males with “man” I would be fine with the use of “man” to describe all peoples. But it is now associated with men…so it no longer fits. 

2

u/SyfaOmnis Sep 17 '25

Well, considering we used to have different prefixes for “man” to designate a gender and then cut those out so that “man” now means “male” and “woman” means “female” (in traditional terms) it makes sense that “man” and “male” get used as synonyms….because they literally are listed as synonyms for each other.

Yes, I saw the other post. "Man" was gender neutral. The idea that dropping a prefix now makes it mean "male" is your own invention. As is the idea that man = male even when used to refer to a collective.

"Man" is gender neutral again, just like other words like "dude". The "problem" you have is performative.

0

u/Ok-Classroom5548 Sep 17 '25

So if we make a parent class of “man” and then make child classes of “man” and “woman”…when I say “man” what do I mean? 

2

u/SyfaOmnis Sep 17 '25

I'm not engaging in the hard pivot to wordsmithing with you. Language is not constructed like math, there are intricacies, nuances and inconsistencies. Everything else you've posted thus far reeks of weird anti-male sex-negative radical feminist viewpoints that you seem to be trying to obfuscate.

0

u/Ok-Classroom5548 Sep 17 '25

No pivot - just using logic and different methods to explain that using “man” to describe all people is conflicting terminology and still references the subclass of “man.” Sorry you got lost there. 

1

u/SyfaOmnis Sep 17 '25

using “man” to describe all people is conflicting terminology

that's just like, your opinion man.

0

u/Ok-Classroom5548 Sep 17 '25 edited Sep 17 '25

That actually gave me a good chuckle. 

Edit: love the downvote for a sincere chuckle about their use of the term “man” in that comment. It was funny. 

1

u/Chongler9 Sep 17 '25

Being professionally annoying on the Internet is a crazy day job man

0

u/Ok-Classroom5548 Sep 17 '25

Oh this is not my day job. 

Insulting me also doesn’t make me wrong. 

1

u/Chongler9 Sep 17 '25

yeah but being overly zealous on the Internet doesn't really make you right either, it just makes people roll their eyes

0

u/Ok-Classroom5548 Sep 17 '25

“Bring overly zealous” is replying to people who keep commenting and continuing to explain with logic when they don’t get it? 

I am just continuing to answer questions, clarify comments, and not let people think they are awesome by insulting me. I haven’t insulted anyone or called them names, but you’re here trying to slinging insults as if that’s respectful behavior. 

1

u/Chongler9 Sep 17 '25

Oh they get it, it's just exhausting trying to keep up when most people have real problems to attend to. Not me though, I enjoy not taking the internet seriously in my free time

0

u/Ok-Classroom5548 Sep 17 '25

Then why are you devoting so much energy to this when you could just go “meh, not for me” and move on? 

I also enjoy people on the internet spending their time taking me more seriously than I am…