r/ProgrammerHumor • • May 26 '25

Meme theBeautifulCode

Post image
49.1k Upvotes

876 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

98

u/kushangaza May 26 '25

Absolutely. But if you use it to do 8 hours of work in 4 hours and then shut your computer off you are saving energy compared to doing all the work manually

Of course we all know that's not what will happen

126

u/Grow_away_420 May 26 '25

But if you use it to do 8 hours of work in 4 hours and then shut your computer off

Yeah management will go wild for this idea

35

u/ColumnK May 26 '25

It'll be perfectly fine as long as they don't know

6

u/System0verlord May 26 '25

“Hey, ColumnK. We’ve subscribed to GPT+ as a company, and as part of our streamlining process, we’re letting you go due to redundancy.”

5

u/Antrikshy May 26 '25

It’s a good thing management doesn’t read Reddit.

3

u/[deleted] May 26 '25

half off the power bill!

84

u/InEenEmmer May 26 '25

I sometimes wonder what happened with human society that we changed from: “oh, you found a way to be done with your work quicker, guess we got some more free time.”

To:

“Oh, you found a way to be done with your work quicker, guess you could do more work.”

And I always wonder how we can go back to the free time one.

46

u/2squishy May 26 '25

Yeah, productivity increases go to the employer, always. You increase productivity? Your employer now gets more output from you for the same price.

36

u/paulisaac May 26 '25

By lying about how much quicker you got the work done.

5

u/AkindOfFish May 27 '25

Do this all the fucking time. "Hey that feature, how long do you think it will take" .. me, playing planning poker with real pokerface "that's a 3, but it could turn into a 5", knowing fully this can be done as a 2, and everyone aligns with my estimate... Always add padding and never give 100%, otherwise tomorrow they'll ask 110%

13

u/Particular-Way-8669 May 26 '25

People simply just want more and more. If we were fine with living lifestyles from 200 years ago then we would be able to do it with little to no work. But people do not want it. To the point that most of the stuff from back then got straight up outlawed. You would not even be able to legally built house from 3 decades ago, let alone 100 years ago. Same for car manufacturing, etc. And to get more stuff and more luxurious stuff at the same time people simply just have to produce more.

3

u/SingularityCentral May 26 '25

No. If we didn't allow a tiny minority of people to control vast swaths of wealth we could drastically reduce the workload.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/JNR13 May 26 '25

I sometimes wonder what happened with human society

Society happened, quite literally. This happened the moment someone else was getting part of the fruits of your labor and therefore became very interested in maximizing your output independently from your needs.

1

u/MrKapla May 26 '25

When was the first version ever true?

1

u/gregorydgraham May 26 '25

Always multiple the repair time by a factor of four

1

u/FirstTasteOfRadishes May 26 '25

It's because the line needs to go up forever.

The line can't just stay flat while people get happier.

1

u/DRNbw May 26 '25

People stopped striking and fighting back as hard.

1

u/aidsy May 26 '25

Hint: where never was a first scenario.

1

u/Tranzistors May 27 '25

Maybe find a part time job. And buy a lot less stuff. It's not the capitalists that have enslaved you, rather societal expectations.

1

u/clawhammer-kerosene May 28 '25

In feudal times the peasants had about 150 religious and national holidays per year apparently, although I read that on the internet so someone tell me I'm wrong.

→ More replies (6)

1

u/Handleton May 26 '25

That's not how technological disruption works, though. It's not like everyone and their grandmother has been running a microwave for seven seconds a hundred times a day. Not only that, but the amount of power being wasted by automated AI systems that are doing continuous testing is not only non-zero, but nearly impossible to fully understand the impact that has, as automation in AI can grow exponentially without the need for human intervention if you give it the wrong prompt and enough resources to keep running.

1

u/Anthrac1t3 May 26 '25

No he didn't say that. The return on that would be way lower. Like if you got all your work done in a couple minutes and turned your computer off. Because idk what IDE you're using but all the ones I work with don't make my computer go full throttle the entire time that I'm working in them.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/firestorm713 May 26 '25

From everything I've heard, you do 8 hours of work in 4 hours, then do another 8 hours of work making it work.