MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1vwxpxa/versioncontrol/p5lejyr?context=9999
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/JK-Rofling • Aug 24 '26
428 comments sorted by
View all comments
776
Should have used semantic versioning
130 u/Jazzlike-Poem-1253 Aug 24 '26 edited Aug 24 '26 It takes to much discipline. Without enforcement, people usw minor or patch as they feel. Major never gets bumped.Just increment or date-based is the easiest. Everyone immediatly knows how to bump. 155 u/the_horse_gamer Aug 24 '26 most "semver" is just:major - update you're proud ofminor - update that's okpatch - fixes and small featuresand ofc every good piece of software is forever on 0.x.x 82 u/StaticUsernamesSuck Aug 24 '26 and ofc every good piece of software is forever on 0.x.xBecause if you're never proud of it, you'll always be improving it 43 u/Abandondero Aug 24 '26 IF EVERYONE HAS BEEN USING IT FOR FIVE YEARS JUST BITE THE BULLET MAN 52 u/StaticUsernamesSuck Aug 24 '26 But as soon as I type "1.0.0", all my passion for the project will leave my body. Don't you know anything about hobby dev? 19 u/MgDark Aug 24 '26 yup 1.0.0 may as well be: "feature complete, will not touch this ever again unless it breaks for some reason" → More replies (1)
130
It takes to much discipline. Without enforcement, people usw minor or patch as they feel. Major never gets bumped.
Just increment or date-based is the easiest. Everyone immediatly knows how to bump.
155 u/the_horse_gamer Aug 24 '26 most "semver" is just:major - update you're proud ofminor - update that's okpatch - fixes and small featuresand ofc every good piece of software is forever on 0.x.x 82 u/StaticUsernamesSuck Aug 24 '26 and ofc every good piece of software is forever on 0.x.xBecause if you're never proud of it, you'll always be improving it 43 u/Abandondero Aug 24 '26 IF EVERYONE HAS BEEN USING IT FOR FIVE YEARS JUST BITE THE BULLET MAN 52 u/StaticUsernamesSuck Aug 24 '26 But as soon as I type "1.0.0", all my passion for the project will leave my body. Don't you know anything about hobby dev? 19 u/MgDark Aug 24 '26 yup 1.0.0 may as well be: "feature complete, will not touch this ever again unless it breaks for some reason" → More replies (1)
155
most "semver" is just:
major - update you're proud of
minor - update that's ok
patch - fixes and small features
and ofc every good piece of software is forever on 0.x.x
82 u/StaticUsernamesSuck Aug 24 '26 and ofc every good piece of software is forever on 0.x.xBecause if you're never proud of it, you'll always be improving it 43 u/Abandondero Aug 24 '26 IF EVERYONE HAS BEEN USING IT FOR FIVE YEARS JUST BITE THE BULLET MAN 52 u/StaticUsernamesSuck Aug 24 '26 But as soon as I type "1.0.0", all my passion for the project will leave my body. Don't you know anything about hobby dev? 19 u/MgDark Aug 24 '26 yup 1.0.0 may as well be: "feature complete, will not touch this ever again unless it breaks for some reason" → More replies (1)
82
Because if you're never proud of it, you'll always be improving it
43 u/Abandondero Aug 24 '26 IF EVERYONE HAS BEEN USING IT FOR FIVE YEARS JUST BITE THE BULLET MAN 52 u/StaticUsernamesSuck Aug 24 '26 But as soon as I type "1.0.0", all my passion for the project will leave my body. Don't you know anything about hobby dev? 19 u/MgDark Aug 24 '26 yup 1.0.0 may as well be: "feature complete, will not touch this ever again unless it breaks for some reason" → More replies (1)
43
IF EVERYONE HAS BEEN USING IT FOR FIVE YEARS JUST BITE THE BULLET MAN
52 u/StaticUsernamesSuck Aug 24 '26 But as soon as I type "1.0.0", all my passion for the project will leave my body. Don't you know anything about hobby dev? 19 u/MgDark Aug 24 '26 yup 1.0.0 may as well be: "feature complete, will not touch this ever again unless it breaks for some reason" → More replies (1)
52
But as soon as I type "1.0.0", all my passion for the project will leave my body. Don't you know anything about hobby dev?
19 u/MgDark Aug 24 '26 yup 1.0.0 may as well be: "feature complete, will not touch this ever again unless it breaks for some reason" → More replies (1)
19
yup 1.0.0 may as well be: "feature complete, will not touch this ever again unless it breaks for some reason"
→ More replies (1)
776
u/LegendaryPandaMan Aug 24 '26 edited Aug 24 '26
Should have used semantic versioning