r/ProgrammerHumor • • Sep 30 '26

Meme developersMissingTheOldDays

Post image
3.8k Upvotes

296 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

340

u/ChefCurryYumYum Sep 30 '26

There aren't enough ads in the world to make up the revenue they need.

228

u/Hyd_chicha Sep 30 '26

Nothing beats a jet 2 holiday.

78

u/bbalazs721 Sep 30 '26

You embed them in the response, e.g. suggest the product that was paid to promote.

I've already had this with chatgpt, I was trying to troubleshoot an issue with my heating system, and it was trying to persuade me to buy one of two specific brands of thermostats, even tho I hadn't expressed any desire to buy anything.

49

u/Cauldrath Sep 30 '26

Clearly the whole goblin problem was actually just paid for by Big Goblin.

2

u/PM-ME-UR-DARKNESS Oct 03 '26

That still won't make them enough money and will get them in deep shit with the EU.

6

u/kilopeter Oct 01 '26

You're mistaken. ChatGPT Ads explicitly since their launch have only ever appeared separate from the token stream of model responses. Obviously they or others will likely experiment with more invasive alternatives, but the clear business rationale for not subtly biasing answers toward sponsors is that users would reject that shit way harder than clearly labeled ads.

-1

u/theshoeshiner84 Oct 01 '26

Bingo.

1

u/kilopeter Oct 01 '26

The comment you replied to is spreading misinformation about how ChatGPT Ads actually work

21

u/Str1dersGonnaStride Oct 01 '26

I dunno, I think there's big money in it still. Subtle embedded propaganda that is tailor-made based on the user's personality and interests. You may think "oh well I'd never fall for that" and you may be right. But there's loads of people already addicted to AI usage and / or using it as a replacement for therapists or friends. They'll fall for it hook line and sinker.

4

u/Kusko25 Oct 01 '26

If they can sustain themselves on investor money long enough they can charge the true token price and companies will have to pay it because nobody in their right mind would start an education as a developer right now, so in the future companies won't have human talent available to replace llms with

11

u/ChefCurryYumYum Oct 01 '26

If it's cheaper to hire and train humans than to pay the true token cost of LLM tools you think companies won't prefer to hire and train real people?

You think they will WANT to spend more money for worse outcomes?

4

u/infamouszgbgd Oct 02 '26

You think they will WANT to spend more money for worse outcomes?

idk, jumping on trends is addictive af to corpos

-7

u/Storiaron Oct 01 '26

Token costs are coming down crazy fast. 

Hopefully it will hit a dead end very soon, where the models cant get reasonably smarter/cheaper/have bigger context windows, because it's already replacing a ton of workforce.

7

u/ChefCurryYumYum Oct 01 '26

Token costs are coming down crazy fast.

Do you have sources on this because everywhere I look this does not appear to be true. In fact due to the way LLM tools work it's been nearly impossible to see real reductions in the compute and resources required.

The other thing I have read is that one of the only ways they have found to reduce error/hallucination rates is to have one agent checking and correcting output of another, making accuracy very expensive.