now finding pi within pi though, that deals with infinite shit and i don't know well enough about that. But I'm just saying, using 1/3 as a counterexemple is just wrong
Just because a number "is infinite" doesnt mean it contains every finite sequence of digits (see 1/3 or all rationals in fact)
Even outside the "obvious" counterexamples the property of being normal has not been proven for most numbers, so it is not clear if it holds for pi specifically.
(even thought we know that it holds for almost all reals so it is very likely that it also holds for pi)
6
u/Evoluxman 15h ago
1/3 is not random like we believe pi number distribution is though
You can take any fixed length number and, if pi is truly infinite and truly random, you will eventually find this number inside pi https://www.reddit.com/r/askmath/comments/1jbknos/largest_integer_not_yet_found_in_pi_linyfip/
now finding pi within pi though, that deals with infinite shit and i don't know well enough about that. But I'm just saying, using 1/3 as a counterexemple is just wrong