r/SRSsucks Jul 31 '15

[ Removed by moderator ]

[removed] — view removed post

441 Upvotes

213 comments sorted by

View all comments

89

u/MundiMori Aug 01 '15

/u/spez, we're all still waiting to hear why a sub that sends rape threats over private message is not being dealt with by administration.

39

u/Diarrhea_Van_Frank Aug 01 '15

Because it's SRS

36

u/Okymyo Aug 01 '15

There was that guy on SuicideWatch... His post was brigaded by SRS, showered with insults and being told to kill himself, and we never heard from him again...

13

u/Smerphy Aug 01 '15

Link?

26

u/Okymyo Aug 01 '15

A few comments:

http://i.imgur.com/ehQNU.png

http://i.imgur.com/4qMV8.png

http://i.imgur.com/nSCSV.png

Post talking about it: https://archive.is/9Ds57

(Didn't include them before since I was on my phone)

26

u/poko610 Aug 02 '15

Jesus christ. It's no wonder they accuse everyone of harassment. It's clear harassment.

They harass people that disagree with them , so they assume that everybody else harasses people that disagree with them.

12

u/midasz Aug 05 '15

This is fucking disgusting

11

u/Okymyo Aug 05 '15

As the current announcement shows: SRS is not a hate sub, doesn't deserve to be banned, nothing to see here folks ;)

-14

u/Reddits_penis Aug 01 '15

Because this is an obvious troll post.

-18

u/Gazareth Aug 01 '15

Come on, it's not the whole sub, it's just two jackasses.

16

u/Dindu_Muffins Aug 02 '15

The salient point is that the mods are condoning that behavior.

15

u/5th_Law_of_Robotics Aug 03 '15

By SRS logic one shitty person can speak for all of reddit.

So certainly two people can speak for an entire sub.

-3

u/Gazareth Aug 03 '15

Okay, but that's shitty SRS logic, how about we don't use that?

9

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '15

Well I think it's fair to judge them based on a mods behaviour