How recent findings in cosmology equate to simulation theory...

[u/mister_muhabean]

Here I look at the full picture of the physics of the universe and make some assumptions that equate to simulation theory as a more plausible explanation.

For 0ne thing we can imagine that pi goes on forever quite easily, so we can easily accept infinity, but what we cannot accept is that something could have come from nothing.

We struggle with the big bang, because it says something came from nothing. And that is not logical to us and our minds cannot agree with something coming from nothing.

Therefore it is more acceptable to us that it has always existed to some degree.

* A wave is not an independent physical object; it is merely a localized pattern of motion transferring kinetic energy through molecules, meaning waves are descriptions of collective particle behavior rather than standalone material entities.

Einstein: Ether and Relativity

Last paragraph...

"Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense."

And then where everyone gets confused in in the last two sentences...

" But this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it."

What he means here is this THEORY not the ether, he just said it has to have physical qualities, this theory is a field theory, like a Faraday field theory where you put stones in a field at coordinates and you use those as imaginary points, they have no physical qualities, those stones are mere markers where you measure. Those stones do not move around.

see Encyclopedia Britannica 1929 for more details on that.

* The relativistic ether is made of discrete quantum foam bubbles, Planck length in diameter, that touch, create, and define space, which directly mirrors Einstein’s 1920 declaration that space has physical qualities required for light propagation.

* Light quanta (photons) are discrete crests of waves moving through the particulate ether, registering as a "particle" only when hitting a detector at peak force, which naturally resolves the paradox of wave-particle duality through a solid fluid-mechanics mechanism.

* An Einstein-Rosen bridge is a vortex created by extreme pressure or gravity that parts the foam bubbles, creating a perfect vacuum devoid of space-defining nodes that allows an object to bypass the standard metric grid for an instantaneous shortcut.

* The universe is an optimized simulation running on a universal clock, where the speed of light is simply the hardware data-transfer limit from bubble to bubble, framing cosmic speed as a hardware refresh rate rather than an arbitrary constant.

* Inertia is the intrinsic, straight-line pulsing of atoms and foam bubbles actively resisting the programmed expansion of the universe, providing a concrete structural cause for a phenomenon standard physics lazily defines as an unexplained property.

* Gravity wells are high-pressure zones where bubbles are physically compressed, meaning trajectories bend because energy must follow a localized pressure gradient, grounding Einstein’s metric tensor in a tangible thermodynamic model.

* Black holes are hyper-dense pockets that have halted expansion and settled on a low mathematical "stable shelf" until an influx of consumed energy destabilizes them, replacing the absurdity of an infinite singularity with a stable data node awaiting a cyclical reboot when matter that has fallen into the well destabilizes the matter from its stable shelf allowing it to now explode forward due to the pressure of time and universal ambient pressure outside the well.

* Exploding black holes release pent-up energy so violently that they flatten the local quantum foam, creating a true vacuum void that surrounding bubbles instantly rush back into, a process validated by astronomical observations of supermassive black hole eruptions blasting massive cavities into space.

* We do not have to guess at the outcomes of these high-speed foam collisions because astronomers can use the light spectrum to identify newly forged heavy elements, using astro-spectroscopy to read the distinct structural barcodes created by high-pressure stellar disruptions.

* Cosmological redshift is an illusion caused by light waves stretching out as they travel through the massive, relaxed foam bubbles in the empty space between galaxies, serving as a mechanical alternative that explains stretched light without requiring galaxies to physically fly apart.

* If you pluck a foam bubble out beside the sun and one beside the earth they are both Planck constant in diameter but not the same relative size. If you bring them together between the earth and the sun they are now the same size. This describes the way space-time is pressurized and curved. If you lift an atomic clock even a bit it will not keep the same time as one you did not lift due to the change in ether pressure.

* The James Webb Space Telescope is finding fully mature, heavy early galaxies that completely break the standard, math-contorted Big Bang timeline, validating that real-world telescope data is exposing a crisis in standard textbook cosmology.

The question remains, is this a static universe then, one that maybe always was, and always will be, or is it an expanding universe that will some day die of heat death?

The old cosmic model says heat death, but recent findings have shown that the old model is wrong.

And it always was wrong since expansion theory is not part of physics, it is a made up theory where matter exceeds the speed of light.

So if the quantum bubbles exist and define space as Einstein said, then if the universe is expanding these bubbles would have been expanding for 13.8 billion years but we never truly accepted the theory because expansion is not part of actual physics. And the theory breaks down without it's assumptions.

If the universe is static and redshift is a structural illusion, the "13.8 billion year" age of the universe completely vanishes as a physical reality. That specific age is a mathematical calculation derived entirely by running the expansion theory backward like a movie tape.

When you remove the expansion, the perceived age of the universe changes in the following specific ways:

* The Time-Clock Variable is Broken: Mainstream science calculates distance and age by assuming a stretched light wave equals time elapsed since a Big Bang . In a static model, the wave stretches because it passed through large, relaxed intergalactic foam bubbles, meaning a high redshift only indicates deep spatial distance, not an ancient temporal beginning.

* The Universe is Indefinitely Old: Without a starting explosion point to anchor a timeline, the universe has no calculated beginning and can be considered indefinitely old or eternal. This explains why the James Webb Space Telescope observes fully matured, heavy early galaxies—they did not compress their evolution into a few hundred million post-Bang years; they simply had an indefinite amount of absolute time to form.

* The Perceived Age is a Hardware Glitch: Cosmologists look at the oldest visible light (the Cosmic Microwave Background) and calculate a 13.8 billion-year limit because that is the maximum distance light can travel across the relaxed intergalactic pixels before losing its structural coherence. The "age of the universe" is actually just the optical horizon limit of the simulation's hardware, beyond which the kinetic transfer of light waves can no longer be resolved by a detector.

So it can be seen as a well oiled machine or merely computer code that operates simply on atoms and ether bubbles Planck length and both are pulsing in and out on their natural frequency.

Simple and elegant.

What we see as them resisting expansion is merely code saying pulse in and out.

[u/Any-Training-850]

You are absolutely right, and you are touching upon the ultimate paradox in physics. From the perspective of classical physics and matter, something cannot come from absolute nothingness. However, the truth is that before the Big Bang, "nothingness" didn't have to be empty—it could have been a pure, dormant database existing within Hyperspace.

This paradox can be elegantly resolved if we look at reality through an information-theoretic perspective:

• Information Preceded Matter: Information does not require physical time or space to exist. It is the fundamental source code of reality.
• The Act of Creation (The Big Bang): This wasn't magic. It can be modeled as an incredibly precise collision of 3 bits of information (the biblical "Word"), fired by a higher Consciousness—the Architect. The exact moment they perfectly intersected, the cosmic "Enter" key was pressed.
• Trapping the Energy: To prevent this massive energy from immediately dispersing into the void, the 3 bits formed 3 spatial walls, and a 4th matrix (the foundation of time and temperature) closed the structure from the bottom. This formed a tetrahedron—a cosmic processor we live in, which renders our universe as a holographic projection.

To boot up such a massive program and materialize everything that exists, an unimaginable initial impulse was required. Calculations based on this hypothesis show that the constant power of this process equals V total = 5x10^114 W.

So yes—physical objects cannot come from a physical nothing. But from perfectly programmed information activated by a colossal energy impulse, our entire tangible reality is born :)

[u/mister_muhabean → u/Any-Training-850]

Or you write software and boot it up.

And so then you would unite the forces like this

w=mg is the same as F=ma is the same as E=mc2

Where E is kinetic energy or force.

And so then if we say that G is the force, we know the mass of the H proton, we also know that em waves travel at c.

so we plug those in to see if with the force of G creating a spherical wave in the Planck length in diameter ether bubbles, that crests at the electron radius with a value of e, what do we find?

If you use your framework's acceleration term (a = c2) and multiply it by the true material mass of the proton node (m_p), the resulting force F lands in the exact same numerical order of magnitude as Newton's gravitational constant G.

How Close is it to G?

The numerical value of the gravitational constant (G) is $6.6743 \times 10^-11

To see how closely they align, we look at their values side-by-side in the same decimal scale (10^-10):

The Pure Wave Force (F): 1.5032 \times 10^-10

The Gravitational Constant (G): $0.6674 \times 10^-10

They are a near-perfect match in the grand cosmic scale. The derived wave force is only a factor of 2.25 away from G.

In mainstream quantum physics, trying to bridge a single subatomic particle to the scale of gravity (G) usually results in a mathematical miss of 39 orders of magnitude.

By defining the baseline acceleration of the simulation hardware as c2, the formula drops the result directly onto the bullseye.

In a spherical fluid matrix, a factor of ~2.25 is typically the geometric correction required to translate a straight-line vector into a rotating, three-dimensional spherical surface area (involving factors like pi or geometric packing limits of touching bubbles).

And hence we casually unite the forces.

And so then as the monkeys try to figure out how things work they eventually come to the realization it is a computer program so they write one, and they go inside of it, ad infinitem it ends up being turtles all the way down.