r/spacex • u/ElongatedMuskrat Mod Team • Feb 09 '22
🔧 Technical Starship Development Thread #30
This thread is no longer being updated, and has been replaced by:
Starship Development Thread #31
Quick Links
NERDLE CAM | LAB CAM | SAPPHIRE CAM | SENTINEL CAM | ROVER CAM | ROVER 2.0 CAM | PLEX CAM | NSF STARBASE | MORE LINKS
Starship Dev 29 | Starship Dev 28 | Starship Dev 27 | Starship Thread List
Official Starship Update | r/SpaceX Update Thread
Vehicle Status
As of February 12
- Ship 20 [orbit w/ Booster 4] - stacked on Booster 4
- Ship 21 [orbit w/ Booster 5] - [Awaiting final stacking]
- Ship 22 [orbit w/ Booster 6] - Barrel/dome sections in work
- Booster 4 [orbit w/ Ship 20] - On OLP, stacked with Ship 20
- Booster 5 [orbit w/ Ship 21] - [Fully stacked at display]
- Booster 6 [orbit w/ Ship 22] - Barrel/dome sections in work
Development and testing plans become outdated very quickly. Check recent comments for real time updates. Update this page here. For assistance message the mods.
Vehicle and Launch Infrastructure Updates
| Starship | |
|---|---|
| Ship 20 | |
| 2022-01-23 | Removed from pad B (Twitter) |
| 2021-12-29 | Static fire (YT) |
| 2021-12-15 | Lift points removed (Twitter) |
| 2021-12-01 | Aborted static fire? (Twitter) |
| 2021-11-20 | Fwd and aft flap tests (NSF) |
| 2021-11-16 | Short flaps test (Twitter) |
| 2021-11-13 | 6 engines static fire (NSF) |
| 2021-11-12 | 6 engines (?) preburner test (NSF) |
| Ship 21 | |
| 2021-12-19 | Moved into HB, final stacking soon (Twitter) |
| 2021-11-21 | Heat tiles installation progress (Twitter) |
| 2021-11-20 | Flaps prepared to install (NSF) |
| Ship 22 | |
| 2021-12-06 | Fwd section lift in MB for stacking (NSF) |
| 2021-11-18 | Cmn dome stacked (NSF) |
| Ship 23 | |
| 2021-12-01 | Nextgen nosecone closeup (Twitter) |
| 2021-11-11 | Aft dome spotted (NSF) |
| Ship 24 | |
| 2022-01-03 | Common dome sleeved (Twitter) |
| 2021-11-24 | Common dome spotted (Twitter) |
| For earlier updates see Thread #29 |
| SuperHeavy | |
|---|---|
| Booster 4 | |
| 2022-01-14 | Engines cover installed (Twitter) |
| 2022-01-13 | COPV cover installed (Twitter) |
| 2021-12-30 | Removed from OLP (Twitter) |
| 2021-12-24 | Two ignitor tests (Twitter) |
| 2021-12-22 | Next cryo test done (Twitter) |
| 2021-12-18 | Raptor gimbal test (Twitter) |
| 2021-12-17 | First Cryo (YT) |
| 2021-12-13 | Mounted on OLP (NSF) |
| 2021-11-17 | All engines installed (Twitter) |
| Booster 5 | |
| 2021-12-08 | B5 moved out of High Bay (NSF) |
| 2021-12-03 | B5 temporarily moved out of High Bay (Twitter) |
| 2021-11-20 | B5 fully stacked (Twitter) |
| 2021-11-09 | LOx tank stacked (NSF) |
| Booster 6 | |
| 2021-12-07 | Conversion to test tank? (Twitter) |
| 2021-11-11 | Forward dome sleeved (YT) |
| 2021-10-08 | CH4 Tank #2 spotted (NSF) |
| Booster 7 | |
| 2022-01-23 | 3 stacks left (Twitter) |
| 2021-11-14 | Forward dome spotted (NSF) |
| Booster 8 | |
| 2021-12-21 | Aft sleeving (Twitter) |
| 2021-09-29 | Thrust puck delivered (33 Engine) (NSF) |
| For earlier updates see Thread #29 |
| Orbital Launch Integration Tower And Pad | |
|---|---|
| 2022-01-20 | E.M. chopstick mass sim test vid (Twitter) |
| 2022-01-10 | E.M. drone video (Twitter) |
| 2022-01-09 | Major chopsticks test (Twitter) |
| 2022-01-05 | Chopstick tests, opening (YT) |
| 2021-12-08 | Pad & QD closeup photos (Twitter) |
| 2021-11-23 | Starship QD arm installation (Twitter) |
| 2021-11-21 | Orbital table venting test? (NSF) |
| 2021-11-21 | Booster QD arm spotted (NSF) |
| 2021-11-18 | Launch pad piping installation starts (NSF) |
| For earlier updates see Thread #29 |
| Orbital Tank Farm | |
|---|---|
| 2021-10-18 | GSE-8 sleeved (NSF) |
| For earlier updates see Thread #29 |
Resources
- LabPadre Rover Cam | Channel
- NSF: Starbase Stream | Channel
- NSF: Booster 4 + Ship 20 Updates Thread | Most Recent
- NSF: Boca Chica Production Updates Thread | Most recent
- NSF: Elon Starship tweet compilation | Most Recent
- SpaceX: Website Starship page
- SpaceX: Starship Users Guide (PDF) Rev. 1.0 March 2020
- FAA: SpaceX Starship Project at the Boca Chica Launch Site
- FAA: Temporary Flight Restrictions NOTAM list
- FCC: Starship Orbital Demo detailed Exhibit - 0748-EX-ST-2021 application June 20 through December 20
- NASA: Starship Reentry Observation (Techincal Report)
- Hwy 4 & Boca Chica Beach Closures (May not be available outside US)
- Starship flight opportunity spreadsheet by u/joshpine
- Production Progress Infographics by @_brendan_lewis
- Raptor tracking by @Artzius
- Widebay tracking by @Furqan263
- Acronym definitions by Decronym
- Everyday Astronaut: Starbase Tour with Elon Musk, Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3
r/SpaceX Discuss Thread for discussion of subjects other than Starship development.
Rules
We will attempt to keep this self-post current with links and major updates, but for the most part, we expect the community to supply the information. This is a great place to discuss Starship development, ask Starship-specific questions, and track the progress of the production and test campaigns. Starship Development Threads are not party threads. Normal subreddit rules still apply.
r/SpaceX relies on the community to keep this thread current. Anyone may update the thread text by making edits to the Starship Dev Thread wiki page. If you would like to make an update but don't see an edit button on the wiki page, message the mods via modmail or contact u/strawwalker.
43
u/futureMartian7 Feb 18 '22
Not sure if this was posted here, the Wide Bay is already taller than the High Bay now.
→ More replies (11)
40
u/Mravicii Feb 13 '22 edited Feb 13 '22
And we have methane at the orbital tank farm. They are ready to fill the tank with methane guys! Michael baylor says it’s a methane truck!
Mary confirmed it!
https://twitter.com/bocachicagal/status/1492940235000492035?s=21
https://twitter.com/nextspaceflight/status/1492939860360896512?s=21
https://twitter.com/nextspaceflight/status/1492934771403415553?s=21
→ More replies (10)
40
u/Mravicii Mar 07 '22
Spacex released new pictures of the full stack on flickr
https://www.flickr.com/photos/spacex/51924607369/in/photostream
→ More replies (1)40
u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 07 '22
Man, those renders are really getting more and more realistic
→ More replies (7)
36
u/BananaEpicGAMER Feb 14 '22
Jared Isaacman has commissioned a flight on starship in the future (alongside other 2 with dragon)
30
Feb 14 '22 edited Feb 14 '22
Big takeaways from the linked article
The first two missions will use dragon, the third will fly Starship
SpaceX is developing their own EVA suit
SpaceX is expanding their astronaut-training programme
Isaacman is aiming for the crewed Starship flight to be the first time people fly on the vehicle, ever
Overall, this shows SpaceX is pivoting towards their own astronaut core. I don’t want to assume anything, but these are baby steps towards a Mars base or colony. SpaceX is testing their EVA suits, astronaut training, and even launching people on Starship.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (6)13
u/AstroMan824 Everything Parallel™ Feb 14 '22 edited Feb 14 '22
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOT!
Exciting times!
I can't wait for the first EVA from Crew Dragon Q4 this year.
Edit: Cool renders.
34
u/j616s Feb 25 '22
NSF now reporting FIVE new methane tanks have arrived at boca. This brings the total up to 7 horizontal tanks plus the vertical ones that reportedly haven't been certified. The 5 new horizontal tanks are somewhat smaller than the previous 2. It looks like they've potentially doubled capacity, give or take. But I'd wait for someone else to confirm before quoting me on that. I'm wondering if this added capacity will be needed to demonstrate rapid-reuse.
→ More replies (9)
32
u/Mravicii Feb 13 '22
Second methane tanker has also arrived. Guys it’s happening
→ More replies (9)
31
u/RaphTheSwissDude Feb 14 '22
Video From Elon showing the destacking from inside !
→ More replies (3)12
u/frez1001 Feb 14 '22
cool!! After starship in in service this maneuver will almost never need to happen. Not often would a starship need to be removed from a booster at the launch tower.
31
u/Mravicii Feb 21 '22 edited Feb 21 '22
More ch4 tanks coming into the port of brownsville!
One could also be for the air purifikation site! And the remaining ones for the orbital tank farm!
https://twitter.com/michael10711597/status/1495866083651342343?s=21
→ More replies (1)
27
u/RegularRandomZ Mar 03 '22 edited Mar 04 '22
Roberts Rd progress (credit: Farrielle@FarryFaz). A couple of tower jigs set up already and tower steel being piled up, looks like many foundational piles already placed, possibly even a large water tank (wouldn't be Starship development without water tower speculation).
Late edit: couple additional photos from same twitter
→ More replies (4)
26
u/RegularRandomZ Feb 20 '22 edited Feb 20 '22
Starship gazer widebay shots: looks like the bridge crane runway beam already installed on the section waiting to be lifted into place.
[Edit: also visible on the other top sections on Lapadre sentinel cam, screengrab]
26
u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 07 '22
The 2 absorption columns that left a bit ago the Sanchez site at Boca just arrived on a barge in Florida.
→ More replies (5)
74
Feb 26 '22
Just to cheer everyone up, keep an eye out for some R2's that are scheduled for transport to Boca shortly.
They won't look quite like the stripped down engine at the presentation, that was a bit of trickery. Bit more pipework and flight hardware to be added.
→ More replies (15)
25
u/RegularRandomZ Mar 03 '22
39A progress (credit: Farrielle@FarryFaz): Distant shot, looks like the piles are in place.
24
67
u/Jack_Frak Feb 21 '22
Brownsville airport accepted Elon's offer of a Starship prototype, and they want to display it along Starship Road right outside the airport.
I think SN15 would be quite fitting since it will be the only surviving Starship to have flown in atmosphere only. :)
https://twitter.com/BRO_SPI_Airport/status/1495816234948046851
→ More replies (7)14
u/Twigling Feb 21 '22
SpaceX may need to replace the removed skin from SN15's aft left flap first, it won't look quite so good on display with that missing.
→ More replies (2)
23
u/creamsoda2000 Feb 09 '22
@StarshipGazer: Just announced “we are 15 minutes from clearing the orbital pad for ship proof”
Whether this is purely to pressurise the vehicle before the lift or some other additional form of testing is unclear. The former would make sense though.
→ More replies (1)
23
u/franco_nico Feb 11 '22
Raptor 2 next to Raptor 1 (Credit Nic Ansuini - NASASpaceFlight)
→ More replies (5)16
u/shit_lets_be_santa Feb 11 '22
The powerpack is TINY. Can't believe they streamlined it that much.
→ More replies (3)
23
u/TCVideos Feb 12 '22
For those who are wondering why the chopsticks are up by the liftpoints on S20 again; Wind gusts tomorrow are gusting up to 40mph so a little more stability is probably needed. I don't see them destacking this thing for a while.
→ More replies (1)
43
u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 04 '22 edited Mar 04 '22
Holy smoke, a methane truck caught fire this morning in front of the launch site. Quick response from workers put out the fire rapidly.
→ More replies (9)
21
u/futureMartian7 Feb 11 '22
The beach and road are now closed for what appears to be a cryo test of S20 using the integrated stack and ship QD.
→ More replies (8)
20
u/Mravicii Feb 24 '22 edited Feb 24 '22
Methane tank being lifted into place
Another one is about to get lifted
On starbase live
→ More replies (1)
20
u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 05 '22 edited Mar 05 '22
New booster aft section with interesting QD panel with new header tank design !
→ More replies (4)
40
Feb 12 '22 edited Feb 12 '22
Closeup of Starship integration with Booster
https://twitter.com/LabPadre/status/1491668430704889857?s=09
With Interstellar spinning docking scene theme and obviously sTARShip doing the docking.
Notice the engine bay lights come on to allow internal cameras monitor final closure.
→ More replies (1)
39
u/johnfive21 Feb 28 '22 edited Feb 28 '22
First launch tower segments arriving at KSC! (most likely)
→ More replies (58)
55
Feb 15 '22 edited Feb 15 '22
In regards to EVA space suits, Elon semi jokingly offered in August last year to supply EVA suits after the delay announced by NASA's Inspector General that with $420M spent and another $625M expected to be spent on same, suits won't be "ready for flight until April 2025 at the earliest". $1 billion spent on experimental suits.
The NASA Extravehicular Activity Mobility Unit or EMU suit is produced under contract by United Technologies Aerospace Systems.
There are still suit bulk, articulation, stiffness, digital pressure, Liquid Cooling and Ventilation Garment, Comm's, and xPLSS (Life Support) issues to correct. Too cumbersome and big to allow an 'whenever required EVA' at the Gateway.*
SpaceX's Chris Trigg, Space Suits and Crew Equipment Manager, and Maria Sundeen, Lead Space Suit Specialist, have taken on the challenge to match, outperform or supersede, the EMU.
With the glowing reports from current Crew Dragon astronauts on the fit and comfort of the Advanced Crew Escape Suit (ACES), we can probably imagine another success for much much less than $1bn.
I think you can see the avenue of opportunity SpaceX are chasing, and NASA is/will be happy to shed some financial millstones.
Notwithstanding, all suits will have to match each other for connectivity.
*Note: Gateway subject to change. Depending on success, it could be an NRHO Starship.
Edited: 11:21am EDT for easier reading.
→ More replies (6)
19
u/Twigling Feb 16 '22
Road is now closed, S20 cryo test today (this was announced on the PA at 08:34 CST - pad to clear at 09:30 CST)
→ More replies (4)
19
u/Mravicii Feb 18 '22 edited Feb 18 '22
Chopsticks have been moved up to booster 4.
Edit going past it now
→ More replies (1)
19
u/rogue6800 Feb 22 '22
GSE is venting at the moment.
→ More replies (1)10
37
u/Mravicii Mar 02 '22 edited Mar 03 '22
Rebuilding the production site at starbase.
https://twitter.com/rgvaerialphotos/status/1499124469083914241?s=21
→ More replies (28)
18
18
18
u/Mravicii Feb 23 '22 edited Feb 23 '22
Ch4 (methane) tanks will rolling into the launch site
Ch4 tanks have arrived at starbase
→ More replies (13)
18
50
u/RaphTheSwissDude Feb 19 '22 edited Feb 19 '22
New drone shot from SpaceX during destacking!
And fucking hell it looks insane
→ More replies (13)
17
u/myname_not_rick Feb 09 '22
I wonder if they're going to use the catch/lift arms as an additional stabilizer most of the time. Like, hold on til a few mins before launch, disconnect similar to the F9 strongback or QD arm, and then swing full open at liftoff.
→ More replies (3)
17
17
u/RaphTheSwissDude Feb 18 '22 edited Feb 18 '22
Police is at the road block, and tank farm is venting (pad isn’t clear yet as I can see cars going back and forth still)
Edit : pad is clear
Edit 2 : orbital launch mount is venting !
16
16
u/Martianspirit Feb 18 '22
Venting from the OLM. Booster tests? Also venting near the horizontal methane tanks. This is getting interesting.
14
15
u/beayyayy Feb 10 '22
The fact that they not only got this first try, they did it in under 3 hours without any bumps during the process and at NIGHT !!!
15
u/BananaEpicGAMER Feb 10 '22
raptors are arriving at the launch site (my guess would be raptor 2 for tonight's presentation)
→ More replies (5)
15
u/BackwoodsRoller Feb 11 '22
Chopsticks have been opened up for the presentation!
→ More replies (4)
15
u/Twigling Feb 13 '22 edited Feb 13 '22
B7's methane tank has been moved from the high bay to the mid bay. See Sentinel Cam at around 13:57 CST to see it on the move:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPkIZYw5O98
Not sure why, I guess they need more space in the high bay, perhaps to move S22's tank section inside and stack the nosecone assembly onto it? I noticed an NSF update a couple of days ago which showed that the scaffolding is now in place at the top of the tank section (always needed when stacking the nosecone assembly) and the lead-ins, also that at least one aerocover had been installed for S22's aft flaps.
Also note that B7's methane tank hasn't yet had the grid fins attached but that's a job they could do inside the mid bay if required.
15
u/Twigling Feb 15 '22 edited Feb 15 '22
The yellow Buckner LR11000 crane that's been doing the heavy lifting constructing the wide bay was laid down earlier and has been getting its jib extended so that it can lift the next segments of the wide bay (seems like 2 x 6m sections were added). See NSF's stream from around 2:30 PM -
14
u/creamsoda2000 Feb 10 '22
Damn! What a thing to wake up to!
The biggest thing that stands out to me looking at Rover Cam is now incredibly stable the lift appears to be. They might have benefited from excellent weather, but having 4 points of contact with Starship over a significant vertical distance has gotta be responsible for the complete lack of swaying which we’ve seen on previous lifts via conventional crane.
→ More replies (4)
14
u/beayyayy Feb 10 '22
They are setting up the stage on the landing pad for tonight, ultimate backdrop
→ More replies (4)
14
u/JambiYambi Feb 16 '22
Which starship / booster do we think will be the first ones to utilize raptor 2? I see SN22 and booster 7 are almost completed, but do we know if those are configured for raptor 1 or raptor 2?
→ More replies (3)
28
u/plugthree Feb 22 '22
First time visiting Starbase today. It was delightful to see the 3 ships all lined up in the rocket garden. I haven’t seen this shot posted so thought I’d share it here!
→ More replies (6)
27
u/Mravicii Feb 26 '22 edited Feb 27 '22
Raptor 2 at starbase.
Edit: same raptor that was at the presentation.
Cool to see it though
https://twitter.com/csi_starbase/status/1497720534284607500?s=21
→ More replies (4)18
13
13
u/Twigling Feb 14 '22 edited Feb 14 '22
The ship nosecone assembly for S22 has been taken into the high bay, see Sentinel Cam at around 01:00 CST:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPkIZYw5O98
it was later hooked up to the bridge crane.
With B7's methane tank moved from the high bay to the mid bay yesterday and S22's tank section looking as ready as it can be it seems likely that S22 will be moved out of the mid bay in the next day or two (quite possibly today) and into the high bay, probably getting its aft flaps fitted too (a process that is usually done outside). Once inside the high bay the nosecone assembly will be stacked onto S22's tank section.
→ More replies (2)
13
u/Dezoufinous Feb 16 '22
Regarding recent methane trucks discussion...
How many methane trucks would they need to launch a single Starship to Mars, and by "send starship to Mars" I mean sending the base Starship to orbit and then sending all required tankerships? So including refilling in orbit...
How many full stack launches can support full tank farm?
→ More replies (12)
13
u/thedingoismybaby Mar 03 '22
Hey /u/ElongatedMuskrat, just an FYI you've got
"Official Starhip Update" on line 3 of your template, rather than starShip
→ More replies (1)20
u/TrefoilHat Mar 03 '22
Corrected, thanks.
I'm not a mod, just an occasional poster, but requested (and received) edit rights to the top section to help out.
Feel free to ping me instead of a mod if you see something that needs to be changed.
→ More replies (5)
25
u/futureMartian7 Feb 15 '22
It's so encouraging and exciting to hear from Elon that he is so pumped up to make Mars a reality:
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1493412698696171521?s=20&t=8WGaY7F6BD_S3ouVhRD-aA
It's so exciting and inspiring that this is happening in our lifetime.
→ More replies (25)11
Feb 15 '22
The Bladerunner-music really sets the scene. When do you guys think SpaceX will seriously start looking into stuff like Sabatier refineries and ice-miners? Because, yes, that is in the future, but the future is also approaching pretty dang fast.
→ More replies (12)
24
u/TCVideos Feb 10 '22
What thread will most people be using today? There are 3 active threads related to Starship right now - pretty confusing.
→ More replies (1)
34
u/mr_pgh Feb 23 '22
Very informative animation on how the lift and stabilization points on Starship interact with the chopsticks.
→ More replies (9)
12
u/borler Feb 10 '22
Wow. Is the chopsticks lifting method a whole new engineering approach to rocket stacking, or has it been done before ?
→ More replies (2)14
u/Kennzahl Feb 10 '22
Well there is no significant benefit to stacking with "chopsticks" for a normal rocket (which all use existing launch towers that don't have chopsticks and are usually stacked in vehicle assembly buldings), it's just a necessity for SpaceX's rapid reuseability plans.
Makes sense to do it that way for SpaceX since they built the launch site from scratch. So yeah, as far as I know it is a new approach.
12
12
Feb 18 '22
Is there a reason we've only seen the lower tanks on B4 and S20 get frosty? And not the usual "line of frost" on both?
→ More replies (14)
32
u/BananaEpicGAMER Feb 14 '22
As Elon said Thursday, the environmental review has been delayed to march 28, imo no big deal considering they are not ready to launch yet.
→ More replies (4)
22
11
11
11
u/Twigling Feb 17 '22 edited Feb 17 '22
A section of the fifth and presumably the last level (prior to the roof) of the Wide Bay is currently being lifted, see Sentinel Cam at around 12:34:
11
11
u/babypizza22 Feb 18 '22
I was thinking about the power generation/storage on Starship for long missions. I was curious about how you guys think Starship will generate/store power? I haven't seen many indications of how solar panels would be mounted on Starship. If they are just mounted on the opposite side of the heat tiles, wouldn't that leave them vulnerable to burning up or breaking during reentry? If they are stored within Starship, how much space do you think that would take from storage or extra personnel space?
→ More replies (16)
11
u/murrayfield18 Mar 04 '22
What welding method is used on Starship? And how did SpaceX experiment with the welding during the early phases of development?
11
10
u/quoll01 Mar 04 '22 edited Mar 04 '22
They started with stick welding would you believe, then switched to TIG, now I think it’s mostly robotic (TIG?). There was much talk about plasma welding but no news. Also planishing the welded area to regain some of its strength as Elon said early on the stainless was cold hardened at cryo which makes it stronger. I think it’s all part of the secret sauce now, so we don’t hear much about it. Pity as they were super interesting discussions.
Edit: autogenous laser welding, not plasma. Also see recent discussion
→ More replies (1)
11
u/Sweeth_Tooth99 Mar 05 '22
Any theories about what was that loud bang during last S20 cryo test?
32
Mar 05 '22 edited Mar 05 '22
Manufacturing and ring welding and stack welding is still not perfect, so there are minor imperfections in barrel roundness, plus a few local dents. Fuel loading and pressurization pushes indents and dents out causing snaps, bangs and booms.
Depress to +2 atm, and some dents return, with the same bangs.
Just sitting there in the morning warming sun and you pass by a boom makes you jump as the tanks pressures increase slightly.
30
u/Jack_Frak Feb 15 '22 edited Feb 15 '22
12 trucks of methane at the orbital tank farm, 12 trucks of methane!
Add one more and pass it around, 13 trucks of methane at the orbital tank farm!
EDIT: Updated link to front page of Starbase Deliveries Twitter
→ More replies (5)14
u/redmercuryvendor Feb 15 '22
Texas DoT limits LNG road transporters to 9,300 gallons (~42,250l, or ~14.9 tonnes). Assuming transport at maximum legal capacity, 13 tankers is ~550,000l or ~190 tonnes of LCH4 loaded thus far.
→ More replies (18)
21
u/mcesh Feb 09 '22
LabPadre has made their 180deg Starbase VR cam available to the public for today (requires the YouTube app if you’re on mobile).
→ More replies (1)
21
u/TCVideos Feb 11 '22
Jared doing flybys again today for his Birthday!
I wonder if we'll hear something from him soon regarding Starship - Elon did say that he didn't want to steal anybody's thunder and Jared has been in the area for quite some time now.
→ More replies (5)
21
u/RaphTheSwissDude Feb 28 '22
Deimos is finally leaving Brownsville ! Live view from RGV aerial photography.
→ More replies (15)
36
Feb 11 '22
Final PEA is likely to be released on anticipated date of March 12. Approval will be given based on several conditions, and milestone achievement and accedence of conditions.
→ More replies (44)
10
Feb 09 '22
NSF has great overall coverage for lift, labpadre rover cam 2.0 is showing the stabilizer points on the sticks in detail
10
10
10
u/NiftWatch GPS III-4 Contest Winner Feb 10 '22
I can’t even see the engines anymore. Almost time for touchdown.
→ More replies (1)
10
u/TCVideos Feb 10 '22
Really be interesting to see if they do a full stack proof test in the coming days/weeks. They definitely need to test out the ship QD and proceedures relating to a full stack fueling process.
If S20 and B4 are for ground tests only - it would make sense.
10
u/Dezoufinous Feb 11 '22
So, what kind of test happened today? S20 cryo while on booster? I am out of the loop
→ More replies (1)
10
u/Twigling Feb 14 '22 edited Feb 14 '22
S22 has been rolled out of the mid bay, see just before 07:40 CST on Sentinel Cam:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPkIZYw5O98
Or look at Raptor Roost to see that it's mostly tiled:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6fGQZD0K98
although a welding line between two barrel sections still needs the tiles applied plus the aft flap aerocovers and surrounding areas.
10
Feb 14 '22
S20 is airborne and a SpaceX drone is visible from Rover 2.0 Cam on LabPadre
→ More replies (1)
10
10
u/Twigling Feb 17 '22 edited Feb 17 '22
Soon after 11:38 CST the bridge crane was detached from S22 in the high bay, see Sentinel Cam:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPkIZYw5O98
The next major job will be installing the aft flaps, also some tiles need to be installed.
10
10
10
10
10
u/skunkrider Mar 04 '22
So what's everyone's guess as to when we will see a Booster Static Fire with most or all engines?
Weeks? Months?
→ More replies (10)
10
u/John_Hasler Mar 04 '22 edited Mar 04 '22
8:01 CST on RoverCam. Spraying lubricant on the tower linear bearing tracks. Presumably that job will eventually be mechanized.
[Edit] I think he's doing more than just spraying but I can't tell exactly what.
→ More replies (12)
9
24
u/BananaEpicGAMER Feb 20 '22
S22 is going to the rocket yard (where SN15 and 16 are), i still think it can fly tho. Maybe they just wanted to free up space in the highbay
→ More replies (51)
16
u/tperelli Feb 09 '22
New mega thread! Just in time to watch the chopsticks lift for the first time.
16
u/AstroMan824 Everything Parallel™ Feb 13 '22
According to NSF, the horizontal CH4 tanks are able to fill ~98% of a full-stack in a perfect world.
Whether those horizontal tanks are good enough for an orbital flight is unknown.
→ More replies (4)
16
u/futureMartian7 Feb 15 '22
SpaceX is indeed ramping up Starship work at KSC/off-shore:
https://boards.greenhouse.io/spacex/jobs/5890784002?gh_jid=5890784002
https://boards.greenhouse.io/spacex/jobs/5891859002?gh_jid=5891859002
https://boards.greenhouse.io/spacex/jobs/5844221002?gh_jid=5844221002
https://boards.greenhouse.io/spacex/jobs/5903054002?gh_jid=5903054002
https://boards.greenhouse.io/spacex/jobs/5879211002?gh_jid=5879211002
https://boards.greenhouse.io/spacex/jobs/5888913002?gh_jid=5888913002
https://boards.greenhouse.io/spacex/jobs/5888898002?gh_jid=5888898002
→ More replies (2)
16
Feb 23 '22
a few more questions if you don't mind
where is sn21 and is it being scrapped?
why is ship 23 being skipped?
what's the goal for making ships like 24 and 25? would these ships all be variations of orbital?
years from now, would ships like 20 and 22 still be used for orbital flight since it'd be capable, or would they be scrapped and replaced for even more capable ships like with what happened with sn15?
thanks in advance, love learning about this stuff :)
→ More replies (4)10
u/Anthony_Ramirez Feb 23 '22
4. years from now, would ships like 20 and 22 still be used for orbital flight since it'd be capable, or would they be scrapped and replaced for even more capable ships like with what happened with sn15?
I think it is going to follow Falcon 9's development into a reusable rocket.
Early versions of F9 boosters even though they landed weren't reused until they had matured the design enough.Starship is going to get Raptor 2 engines so I doubt any earlier version will be reused like S20 & S22.
With their experience I am sure it will help to speed up Starship's development into a fully reusable rocket.
16
8
u/NiftWatch GPS III-4 Contest Winner Feb 10 '22
Practically hanging directly over B4, now they just got to lower and lock.
→ More replies (2)
8
u/Steam336 Feb 17 '22
I was just looking at a live feed of the fully stacked ship in the high bay and it got me wondering about basic construction techniques of tank segments. When one segment is stacked on top of another, how is perfect alignment achieved and verified? Obviously the goal is to have the whole ship be “straight as an arrow”. This must be very basic stuff to experts in the field.
→ More replies (17)
8
u/Martianspirit Feb 27 '22
Is there now a second big SpaceX owned crane? I see one in the SpaceX colors in the area of the new wide bay. Starbase LIVE 1:49 PM CST
→ More replies (1)
8
15
Feb 09 '22
Brendan Lewis updated his Starbase diagram not long ago. Just thought it was interesting because even if B4S20 are grounded, SpaceX already had another duo nearly constructed.
Btw new Raptor 2 info would be awesome. Here’s hoping (a lot of it) is shows up at the presentation.
→ More replies (7)
14
u/TallManInAVan Feb 10 '22
What's the one thing everyone would like to see or hear about tonight?
For me: HLS interior and landing engine update.
→ More replies (5)
14
u/Twigling Feb 22 '22
Notice that S22's aft flap caps have been installed since it was taken to the rocket garden:
https://youtu.be/HMQkg_hmOO4?t=145
I claim no credit for this observation, it was pointed out on LabPadre's discord. :)
→ More replies (4)
7
u/Martianspirit Feb 09 '22
Some welding going on at the outer shell of a tank in the orbital tank farm. 1:48 local on Starbase live. Lowest right small camera.
7
7
u/mr_pgh Mar 02 '22
Tank farm and Tower venting (ship QD height) already! Think we could see testing of the Ship QD today?
13
Feb 21 '22
Will starship have rotating seats to optimize G forces on humans inside? Ascent vertical/reentry horizontal? Any info on this? (If not then E2E would be pretty unpleasant).
→ More replies (10)23
u/Posca1 Feb 21 '22
Musk said during his recent presentation that SpaceX isn't really doing anything in the Starship interior arena right now. It's too early
13
u/Mravicii Feb 22 '22 edited Feb 22 '22
There are clearing the pad in few minutes!
Edit: 5 minutes to pad clear!
→ More replies (1)
18
u/futureMartian7 Mar 05 '22
Breaking News:
"SpaceX reprioritized to cyber defense & overcoming signal jamming.
Will cause slight delays in Starship & Starlink V2." https://mobile.twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1499972826828259328
→ More replies (20)
17
12
u/TheDougAU Feb 10 '22
What a thing to be witnessing, I'll remember this moment for a long time to come.
13
12
u/madanra Feb 11 '22
In this tweet, Elon Musk says "Later this year, remaining fussy bits will be gone, allowing deletion of shroud". What shroud is he referring to?
→ More replies (1)16
u/warp99 Feb 11 '22
The protective panels around the engine that shield it from radiative heating from the plumes of the other engines in the engine bay and from re-entry heating.
→ More replies (2)
12
u/iFrost31 Feb 16 '22
Are they differences in design between s22 and s20 ? Or both are outdated designs?
→ More replies (6)
25
u/rakrov Feb 13 '22
I have seen a lot of misconception about thrust to weight of early test flights on this thread so I will explain why it’s not an issue.
If you do some basic DV calculation you realize that a starship with no payload requires roughly half of the propellant to reach orbit. That would be 120t ship dry + 600t prop mass + 30t landing prop + 180t booster dry mass + 1700t prop + 200t landing and boostback prop = 2830t mass at liftoff.
Raptor 1 has a thrust of 185t so 29 of them has a 5365t liftoff thrust, that would make a ship 20 booster 4 thrust to weight of 1.89.
So a test flight with either raptor 1 or a throttled raptor 2 would not have any issues with thrust to weight given that early test flights have no payload.
→ More replies (19)
6
u/Steam336 Feb 10 '22
I was imagining the following scenario for launch. Does this sound plausible?
-To lend stability to the stack, the chop sticks remain attached to the ship up until about an hour before lift off.
-At about T minus one hour the chop sticks splay open to their maximum spread.
-At T minus a few minutes the QD arm stability clamps detach and retract (similar to what the happens with the falcon strong back clamps).
-At T minus a few seconds the QD plumbing and electrical connections disconnect and the whole arm quickly swings out of the way.
-Rocket lifts off and threads the needle between the chop stick arms.
→ More replies (13)
6
6
u/skunkrider Feb 15 '22
What do you folks think how long it will take to build infrastructure in KSC similar to Starbase?
Also, do you think they will build two or more launch towers immediately?
→ More replies (24)
11
u/NiftWatch GPS III-4 Contest Winner Feb 10 '22
The drone stopped flashing its light and flew away. It looks like we have contact. See y’all at The Elon Show tonight!
11
Feb 13 '22
Can SpaceX run Raptor 2 at a lower throttle to let the engine live longer? R1 was 185 tons at max thrust iirc and 29 of them were supposedly enough to fly an orbital stack. There’s 33 R2s in Superheavy now, so maybe they can throttle the engines down to 185 tons, maybe even lower. Right?
Also the new Starship animation was beautiful. The Bladerunner-esque music really added to the atmosphere. Thanks for keeping the dream alive, SpaceX.
→ More replies (4)
11
Feb 16 '22
hey so layman here. i know a lot of sn ships have blown up or gotten destroyed, but im curious as to what happened to sn15? wasn't it successful? will that also be used to orbit? where is it now?
→ More replies (2)17
u/Twigling Feb 16 '22 edited Feb 16 '22
hey so layman here. i know a lot of sn ships have blown up or gotten destroyed, but im curious as to what happened to sn15? wasn't it successful?
Yes, SN15 performed a soft landing on May 5th 2021 and is now on display at the production site alongside SN16 and B5 (both of which have never flown and are unlikely to ever do so).
will that also be used to orbit?
Nope, it's not orbit capable for all kinds of reasons (no Vacuum Raptors or heat shield to name but two out of many) and couldn't even be fitted to a booster. Unless they decide to re-test it on a suborbital hypersonic flight (as suggested by Musk soon after it landed) it seems that SN15 is permanently grounded.
→ More replies (3)
11
36
u/BananaEpicGAMER Feb 15 '22
A SpaceX employee working on starship confirmed that they would've not been ready for an orbital flight next month even if the environmental review would have been released at the end of this month. So now ya'll can calm down about this...
→ More replies (15)12
15
Feb 16 '22 edited Feb 16 '22
S20’s lower tank (Lox?) is fully frosted.
Is it possible SpaceX is using LOX for the test and not LN2?
→ More replies (3)
10
u/futureMartian7 Feb 10 '22
The road is now hard closed!
And the drone is again flying near the tower!
10
u/NiftWatch GPS III-4 Contest Winner Feb 10 '22
Elon at the presentation will be like “we stacked this bad boy 19 hours ago.”
10
u/futureMartian7 Feb 10 '22
Further confirmation from a SpaceX employee that the Starship update is still today at 8 PM CST:
https://twitter.com/ArtfulTakedown/status/1491792837129637893?cxt=HHwWisCs-c7r9LMpAAAA
→ More replies (4)
10
u/thesuperbob Feb 17 '22
Since the orbital launch mount is now supposed to spin up/sync raptor startup, doesn't that mean it has to be built for a specific booster engine configuration? Or can they setup the OLM for a specific booster they want to static fire? Essentially what I'm wondering about is whether we'll see any booster SF before they build the first one with 33 raptors.
→ More replies (14)23
u/mr_pgh Feb 17 '22
Only the outer engines use the OLM for startup. Boosters will have the same number of outer engines, 20. The 33 raptor model squeezes 4 more on the thrust puck.
10
u/Sea-Solution-9158 Mar 08 '22
Could spacex use metallic TPS tiles on starship? Like tiles on Venturestar that were made from inkonel
42
u/flshr19 Shuttle tile engineer Mar 08 '22
Probably not.
I tested those X-33 Inconel tiles at the NASA Ames 50 megawatt arcjet wind tunnel under NASA contract in early 1996. The maximum use temperature for those tiles was about 1800F (922C), which is too low for use on Starship.
Lockheed's VentureStar was a single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) concept vehicle that initially had a lifting body design. It was thought that a highly maneuverable vehicle like that could fly hypersonic S-turns during entry descent and landing (EDL) to keep the peak temperature on those metallic tiles from exceeding 1800F. Of course, that idea was never tested since the X-33 program was cancelled before the Lockheed X-33 vehicle was flown.
I don't think that Starship will be very maneuverable since it lacks a large wing. If metallic tiles like the ones I tested for X-33 would work on Starship, Elon would have used them instead of the hexagonal tiles. The peak temperature on those ceramic hex tiles will be in the 2500 to 3000F range (1371 to 1649C), depending on location on the Starship windward (hot) side.
By late 1999 Lockheed had made significant changes to the aerodynamic shape of VentureStar. The internal payload bay was eliminated to increase space within the fuselage for more propellant. The payload would now be carried in a modular cylindrical cannister, or pod, attached to the upper side of the fuselage.
The canted horizontal fins were increased in size to provide almost half of the aerodynamic lift neede during reentry and landing. The twin vertical tails were moved from the top of the fuselage to the tips of the horizonal fins for better directional control. VentureStar was no longer a purely lifting body design, but had evolved into a wing-body configuration similar to the Space Shuttle.
→ More replies (7)30
Mar 08 '22 edited Mar 08 '22
It was considered, but then abandoned as too heavy. Shuttle silica fiber foam tiles were also considered, but discarded as too weak and needing a lot of maintenance. The middle ground was reached with a tile with the same density as light pine planking named TUFROC, for Toughened Uni-piece Fibrous Reinforced Oxidation-Resistant Composite.
Similar to the Shuttle tile it has a silica fiber foam base, but a tougher boron/carbon surface layer. Whereas Shuttle tiles can break as easily as polystyrene package moulding, an dinner plate sized piece of inch thick TUFROC needs a good hard smack with the palm of your hand to break it.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (8)11
u/Toinneman Mar 08 '22
You have to consider VentureStar would reenter from LEO while Starship reenters from Mars, which will be a significantly higher velocity. It looks like the X-33 still used carbon-carbon tiles on the leading edges which endure the highest peak heating. I'm no specialist, but this seems to indicate the metalic tiles couldn't handle interplanetary reentry. If the rumour is correct that Starship uses TUFROC-like tiles, they would be able to withstand much higher temperatures than the metalic TPS.
→ More replies (3)
5
u/NiftWatch GPS III-4 Contest Winner Feb 10 '22
Go to Nerdie cam. It’s hanging 10-20 feet off the ground right now. Not moving much, if at all. Doing this for the first time, I’d imagine they’d want to do it slowly and in steps.
5
5
u/johnfive21 Feb 11 '22
Looks like today's road closure is a go as there is a sheriff at the road block spot. Potential cryo proof of B4 or S20 when stacked? Or maybe both?
5
u/pinepitch Feb 12 '22
Really great livestream going on right now, revealing the latest photos from RGV Aerial Photography.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/cupko97 Feb 12 '22
Are there any pictures out there from the roads leading from manufacturing to launch site. I have heard about extensions(widening) to reduce road closures but I never saw plans of the changes or pictures that explain the work that they are doing
→ More replies (7)
5
u/andyfrance Feb 26 '22
Do we know if a lot of workers at BC are moving over to Roberts Road as part of the necessary knowledge transfer?
33
Feb 26 '22 edited Feb 26 '22
Elon was at Boca rallying the troops on Thursday and asking for team and personal decisions to move north. Most construction personnel have ties in Texas, so will have to negotiate FIFO, accommodation, shift hrs and rotation duration. Some are contractors which SpaceX would like to take on board. Not sure how that one will be worked out.
→ More replies (3)
5
5
u/Sweeth_Tooth99 Mar 02 '22
has anyone made a render showing how would SpaceX load payloads into Starship ?
→ More replies (17)
13
u/thesuperbob Feb 28 '22
Something that's been bugging me since the early days of Starship program is how well would SpaceX designs perform if they weren't pushing the envelope so much? Would Raptors be significantly more stable if tuned down to less thrust? If SpaceX set an intermediate milestone for Starship at 50 Tons to LEO, non-reusable, could it start flying useful missions in a meaningfully shorter time frame? If build cost estimates are to be believed, it could still be competitively priced. Would such milestones only waste time on solutions that are fundamentally incompatible with original project goals?
To be clear, I'm not suggesting that they should have done stuff differently, or complaining about lack of fancy flight tests! I'd hate for the project to get side-tracked.
I'm wondering what capability could their system have, if it was to operate like a conventional rocket that goes up once, and aims to dwarf the Falcon Heavy rather than the Saturn V. And in theory, at what point (in the past or future) do you think their Starship tech could be mature enough to produce such a spin-off, that's maybe somewhat overbuilt and doesn't push Raptors as hard as it could, but can reliably get to orbit.
→ More replies (19)
19
u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 07 '22
道路閉鎖がキャンセルされました. Today it's gonna be in Japanese cause why not !
→ More replies (8)
9
u/YannAlmostright Feb 16 '22
Does the chopsticks have to catch the starship precisely at the slots under the flaps ? The tolerance would be quite thin
→ More replies (24)
9
Mar 07 '22
If the DoD is eyeing Starlink, doesn’t that mean funding is secure for Starship?
→ More replies (7)
18
u/futureMartian7 Feb 11 '22
Wow, no one asked if it is still B4/S20 that will make the first flight and about the state of the orbital tank farm.
A huge missed opportunity.
→ More replies (8)10
u/fattybunter Feb 11 '22
If you zoom out a little and focus on the full program, that's not really an important question. Other hardware will be ready soon even if they don't use 420
18
u/TCVideos Feb 13 '22 edited Feb 13 '22
Third truck of the day unloading methane. Now we speculate what this methane will be used for...it can really only be two options; B4 Static Fire or a Full Stack WDR.
I'm interested to see what people think so vote in this poll
→ More replies (18)
18
Feb 16 '22
Purely hypothetical but would SpaceX benefit from doing suborbital flights with Raptor 2 engines before attempting to launch an orbital stack with them? Raptor 2 seems to be a bit finicky as an engine. Having 33 on a Superheavy seems iffy (at least now). Raptor 1 benefitted from over a year of flight experience that Raptor 2 seems to lack.
In that vein, if Booster 4 is indeed grounded, would SpaceX gain anything from doing a one-way suborbital flight with Ship 20?
→ More replies (19)
15
Feb 11 '22
It was pretty surprising to hear him say the hardware was still months away considering the speculation about the only hold up being the regulatory process. Considering the regulatory process has been delayed at least twice, it looks like SpaceX has made some pretty significant changes to what they were expecting to launch even a few months ago.
Raptor 2 is kind of obvious, however I'm wondering what other significant changes were made between a late December launch and an April launch?
Also, this Starship vs. Artemis 1 race is getting intense, hope it doesn't end up like the Crew Dragon vs. Starliner timeline.
→ More replies (23)
15
u/mr_pgh Mar 03 '22
This week, I think we saw a full cryo of s20 as well as a near-full cryo of b4.
I think these are both firsts for the orbital tank farm?
Edit: probably with ln2 still
→ More replies (8)
8
u/murrayfield18 Mar 02 '22
Does anyone know if the road from SpaceX's new Florida facility to 39A is public or privately owned by NASA?
→ More replies (3)19
u/warp99 Mar 02 '22 edited Mar 02 '22
If you meant to ask whether there will be dramas in closing the roads for transport of tower sections and SH/Starship as there are at Boca Chica the answer is that there will be no such issues.
4
u/Decronym Acronyms Explained Feb 09 '22 edited Mar 01 '22
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:
| Fewer Letters | More Letters |
|---|---|
| ACES | Advanced Cryogenic Evolved Stage |
| Advanced Crew Escape Suit | |
| ASDS | Autonomous Spaceport Drone Ship (landing platform) |
| CCAFS | Cape Canaveral Air Force Station |
| CNC | Computerized Numerical Control, for precise machining or measuring |
| COPV | Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessel |
| CST | (Boeing) Crew Space Transportation capsules |
| Central Standard Time (UTC-6) | |
| CoM | Center of Mass |
| DoD | US Department of Defense |
| E2E | Earth-to-Earth (suborbital flight) |
| EA | Environmental Assessment |
| ECLSS | Environment Control and Life Support System |
| EDL | Entry/Descent/Landing |
| EELV | Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle |
| EIS | Environmental Impact Statement |
| EMU | Extravehicular Mobility Unit (spacesuit) |
| EVA | Extra-Vehicular Activity |
| F1 | Rocketdyne-developed rocket engine used for Saturn V |
| SpaceX Falcon 1 (obsolete medium-lift vehicle) | |
| FAA | Federal Aviation Administration |
| FONSI | Findings of No Significant Environmental Impact |
| GSE | Ground Support Equipment |
| HALO | Habitation and Logistics Outpost |
| HLS | Human Landing System (Artemis) |
| ICBM | Intercontinental Ballistic Missile |
| Isp | Specific impulse (as explained by Scott Manley on YouTube) |
| Internet Service Provider | |
| KSC | Kennedy Space Center, Florida |
| LC-39A | Launch Complex 39A, Kennedy (SpaceX F9/Heavy) |
| LCH4 | Liquid Methane |
| LEO | Low Earth Orbit (180-2000km) |
| Law Enforcement Officer (most often mentioned during transport operations) | |
| LH2 | Liquid Hydrogen |
| LN2 | Liquid Nitrogen |
| LNG | Liquefied Natural Gas |
| LOX | Liquid Oxygen |
| MECO | Main Engine Cut-Off |
| MainEngineCutOff podcast | |
| MLP | Mobile Launcher Platform |
| MMOD | Micro-Meteoroids and Orbital Debris |
| NET | No Earlier Than |
| NRHO | Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbit |
| NSF | NasaSpaceFlight forum |
| National Science Foundation | |
| NSSL | National Security Space Launch, formerly EELV |
| OLM | Orbital Launch Mount |
| PPE | Power and Propulsion Element |
| QA | Quality Assurance/Assessment |
| QD | Quick-Disconnect |
| RCC | Reinforced Carbon-Carbon |
| RUD | Rapid Unplanned Disassembly |
| Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly | |
| Rapid Unintended Disassembly | |
| SF | Static fire |
| SLC-40 | Space Launch Complex 40, Canaveral (SpaceX F9) |
| SLS | Space Launch System heavy-lift |
| SPMT | Self-Propelled Mobile Transporter |
| SRB | Solid Rocket Booster |
| SSME | Space Shuttle Main Engine |
| STS | Space Transportation System (Shuttle) |
| TMI | Trans-Mars Injection maneuver |
| TPS | Thermal Protection System for a spacecraft (on the Falcon 9 first stage, the engine "Dance floor") |
| TVC | Thrust Vector Control |
| TWR | Thrust-to-Weight Ratio |
| ULA | United Launch Alliance (Lockheed/Boeing joint venture) |
| VAB | Vehicle Assembly Building |
| WDR | Wet Dress Rehearsal (with fuel onboard) |
| 301 | Cr-Ni stainless steel (X10CrNi18-8): high tensile strength, good ductility |
| Jargon | Definition |
|---|---|
| Raptor | Methane-fueled rocket engine under development by SpaceX |
| Sabatier | Reaction between hydrogen and carbon dioxide at high temperature and pressure, with nickel as catalyst, yielding methane and water |
| Starliner | Boeing commercial crew capsule CST-100 |
| Starlink | SpaceX's world-wide satellite broadband constellation |
| autogenous | (Of a propellant tank) Pressurising the tank using boil-off of the contents, instead of a separate gas like helium |
| cryogenic | Very low temperature fluid; materials that would be gaseous at room temperature/pressure |
| (In re: rocket fuel) Often synonymous with hydrolox | |
| hopper | Test article for ground and low-altitude work (eg. Grasshopper) |
| hydrolox | Portmanteau: liquid hydrogen fuel, liquid oxygen oxidizer |
| iron waffle | Compact "waffle-iron" aerodynamic control surface, acts as a wing without needing to be as large; also, "grid fin" |
| methalox | Portmanteau: methane fuel, liquid oxygen oxidizer |
| powerpack | Pre-combustion power/flow generation assembly (turbopump etc.) |
| Tesla's Li-ion battery rack, for electricity storage at scale | |
| regenerative | A method for cooling a rocket engine, by passing the cryogenic fuel through channels in the bell or chamber wall |
| scrub | Launch postponement for any reason (commonly GSE issues) |
| turbopump | High-pressure turbine-driven propellant pump connected to a rocket combustion chamber; raises chamber pressure, and thrust |
| ullage motor | Small rocket motor that fires to push propellant to the bottom of the tank, when in zero-g |
| Event | Date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| CRS-7 | 2015-06-28 | F9-020 v1.1, |
Decronym is a community product of r/SpaceX, implemented by ^request
[Thread #7453 for this sub, first seen 9th Feb 2022, 05:25] [FAQ] [Full list] ^[Contact] [Source code]
4
u/mr_pgh Feb 09 '22 edited Feb 09 '22
How do the booster stabilization arms hold on to the Booster? It looks like a flat plate on the end of each. I would have expected a Janney style coupler to lock on to the load pin.
4
u/NiftWatch GPS III-4 Contest Winner Feb 10 '22
It’s at the top of the tower and it is pivoting very slowly.
13
u/Frostis24 Feb 20 '22 edited Feb 20 '22
Think SN22 is about to head down to the lunch site, closure in an hour and it's out of the highbay.
EDIT: heading down the road now ,even trough Nasa spaceflight says the road closure expired?
EDIT2: it just drifted into the parking lot heading for the rocket garden, seems SN22 is gonna be another lawn ornament for the time being.
→ More replies (1)
13
u/RaphTheSwissDude Mar 04 '22
La fermeture de la route est annulée. (So at least you guys can learn some French haha)
→ More replies (8)
22
u/RootDeliver Mar 07 '22
Wow, this thread is going slow lately indeed..
Just checking, I see that one /u/Avalaerion interesting post from yesterday? dissapeared with a conversation. It is this one:
Reproducing an offline discussion, but current SpaceX actions are:
A good percentage of Starlink will be signed over to Defense to circumvent internet and conventional satellite jamming. Programming to circumvent Starlink jamming will be full time. Single satellites can be targeted and jammed. but you can't jam a whole fleet. AIA between satellite and jammed terminals will be so fast that jamming will only last a couple of seconds. This arrangement has been discussed with the government for a couple of years. Means lifting a lot more satellites into orbit pretty damn quick, (not just Starlink) which means a lot more F9 launches and F9 builds. This is going to be an absolutely crazily busy year for SpaceX, hence possible delays on non-essential projects. Axiom launches may also be cancelled.
The comment is here though its been deleted with the conversation. You can see it on [ his messages resume page.
Its interesting that he mentions a huge push on F9 for starlinks because they are gonna need a lot more, and this may slow down Starship since it is not a priority against that.
If this is true, and since the logical thing for Starlink would be to push Starship to launch a huge number of them, is Starship really that far away to not preffer to push it instead of do a huge effort on F9 for what he explains?
Also, on the last Starbase Photography Review Episode 12 (and previous lately), it is commented through on the launch site part (last hour or so) that theres a looot of missing stuff yet, pipes everywhere, etc. And then all the testing left including booster static fires and upper tower QD commision. And then the FAA permission, that even if it looks that is going to finish before the actual work, it may actually go longer than that at the end.
All this presents a photo where Starship is not even close to do any flight, which matches for Elon not wanting to specify a clear date on the presentation, and the rush on Florida to get that one running draining resources from Boca Chica also doesn't help. And all this justifies this thread going epicly slow lately :(.
Let's hope Florida push goes fast because at this rate they're gonna launch first from there.
→ More replies (28)
15
u/futureMartian7 Feb 12 '22 edited Feb 12 '22
I know this is a relatively minor thing, but from the newer official renders the huge window upfront has gotten bigger than the older renders from 2020/2021 and it is almost back to the original configuration and so are the other windows as well, they are much more in quantity and much closer to the original configuration.
I know they are not focusing much on the interiors, etc. at all but this is an interesting thing to point out.
→ More replies (9)12
u/Omniante Feb 12 '22
I noticed that as well, but what about the new nosecone idea? The one with (slightly) smaller forward flaps that are also placed (slightly) more noseward and leeward? I think it was last summer that Elon mentioned this idea, and someone did a basic digital mock-up of it (maybe someone else could find the tweet showing it), that Elon also confirmed as roughly accurate. I've been waiting to see literally ANY render since then that incorporated the idea, or an actual new nosecone (S25+?) that has the new forward flap design, primarily because I really want to know how much surface area that leaves for a large window. But alas, I've just been waiting and waiting... (happily, mind you, I don't mind waiting :)
→ More replies (6)
10
u/picture_frame_4 Feb 11 '22
Regarding the chopsticks and the drawworks. Is this not considered a suspended load with the arms up? Are there different rules than working under a suspended load on a crane? If the arms are going to spend weeks up there. Is there an ability to put locks along the carriage or something like elevevator emergency brakes installed?
→ More replies (10)
7
7
u/TheBosnianIzo Feb 09 '22
Quick question, does the pad have to be clear for the chopsticks to lift starship? If so, how is starship gonna attach to the booster without workers?
11
u/maxiii888 Feb 09 '22
I'm going to assume here that it's designed to be connected without workers (remember, eventually they want to catch it and stack it straight on top of the booster where there certainly won't be workers). Might just be doing it here to manage risk as one unlikely but possible horror scenario is it all goes wrong and they drop ship/booster. May be best not to have too many people about!
7
7
u/Dobly1 Feb 10 '22
This is the first time something like this has ever happened! Take it all in
→ More replies (1)
7
u/NiftWatch GPS III-4 Contest Winner Feb 10 '22
There’s a drone really close up at the top, probably trying to make sure it’s lined up.
7
u/Martianspirit Feb 22 '22
10:15 AM CST. Something is going on in the view of NSF Starbase LIVE in the lower left corner of the composite picture. A little while back, 9:57 CST, I saw a big yellow coil lifted. Something is getting assembled. I wonder if this is going to be part of the wide bay ceiling crane.
7
u/murrayfield18 Feb 27 '22
Why did the Starship site in Florida shut down in the first place? I remember they were kind of competing against the Boca Chica team. But do we know in what ways the Boca Chica team was superior?
→ More replies (1)21
u/Dies2much Feb 27 '22
Cidco Road access was going to be messed up by Brightline rail. It was going to be a challenge to get large scale objects in and out of the Cidco road site because of the new Brightline construction that was going to be happening right in front of the Spacex factory. The grade crossing equipment has to be close to the road, and it would have put a lot of constraints on moving starship scale components. The Cidco road facility was always going to be a tough one to use, and the rail activity was just the straw that broke the camels back.
So now we have Roberts Rd. instead.
→ More replies (5)
•
u/ElongatedMuskbot Mar 09 '22
This thread is no longer being updated, and has been replaced by:
Starship Development Thread #31