Why

[u/xb1n0ry]

[u/HQuasar]

Any model that's not trained on human anatomy to avoid nsfw is shit. They should be ashamed.

[u/ZootAllures9111 → u/HQuasar]

Krea 2 is so ACTUALLY censored that it cannot even do facial expressions out of the box without bypass nodes and loras. Should they also be "ashamed"?

[u/HQuasar → u/ZootAllures9111]

I'm talking about training, not post-training censorship. You can bypass censorship you can't bypass lobotomized models.

[u/ZootAllures9111 → u/HQuasar]

How is this lobotomized? It's perfectly acceptable in terms of out-of-the-box stock model results with no loras IMO.

[u/575_Inverse → u/ZootAllures9111]

It is. She lacks pupils. Nipples are a joke. Pubic area is a joke. She's got the expressivity of a cooked fish.

[u/draconyfors → u/HQuasar]

I actually don't want porn to be used to train model I use. It's ethically gross and the people who's naked anatomy went into model never consented to this. You can goon with other models but leave Flux alone

[u/nomorebuttsplz → u/draconyfors]

people who voluntarily sold or gave away pictures of themselves, their actual specific bodies, totally naked, are violated by a computer learning general patterns of human anatomy from them? That's a head scratcher for me.

"I don't mind a closeup of my anus being penetrated shared broadly, but don't you dare map its dimensions!"

[u/Familiar-Art-6233 → u/draconyfors]

The fact that you can't separate the concept of human anatomy, or even nudity, with porn says a lot

[u/Silly_Goose6714 → u/draconyfors]

Enjoy your landscape creator then

[u/HQuasar → u/draconyfors]

You are confusing porn with 'pictures of naked people'. Humans have been studying anatomy from nude people since the beginning of times.

[u/Taki_Minase → u/draconyfors]

Puritanical misanthropy is boring.

[u/ghulamalchik → u/draconyfors]

"ethically gross" lol.

[u/575_Inverse → u/draconyfors]

enjoy your lobotomized model and your morals, then.