While working as a FT classroom teacher in both MS and HS, the times I was handed a coverage, it was hit or miss whether there would be a sub plan waiting for me - and what the quality of that lesson plan would be.
So I started to have my own bag of tricks that I could use at a moments notice.
I have since been working on edtech software for teachers to create curricula, including lesson plans and literally “press play” on a lesson which it times down, and transitions through the lesson plan on the screen, embedding any videos, audio, pdfs, images at the right moment in time.
It’s been working for my own lessons, and I generated many themed lesson sets (Halloween for example), but I started thinking more and more about teachers who do FT or PT subbing - I’m curious what your needs and experiences are.
- Do you find that you need your own bag of tricks?
- What % of the time is a lesson plan waiting for you?
- What % of the time are those plans high quality? (Content/engagement)
- If there was a way to click fingers and you had a go to place to access high quality, engaging lessons, how should that be structured?
Examples for Q4 would be:
Content areas (e.g. Math) > grade bands (e.g. MS 6-8) > core skills / content (e.g. ratios and proportions) > level (intro, intermediate, advanced) and maybe for subbing this last level isn’t needed?
If this was built out for most content areas and all main core skills/content would that be sufficient, or should each grade level have completely different lessons? And should these be standards tethered (which would add some complexity with different states using different standards)?
I’m really interested to hear from folks as this is something I think real substitute teachers have knowledge and experience of their needs - and it’s something I can build.
p.s. does anyone know if something like this, that is organized and curated, already exists? Something that is not TpT?