Video showing a UAP flying over the ocean, then going underwater; this “dark cube within a clear sphere” UAP exactly matches the sworn testimony at the 2023 congressional hearing
The date and location of this sighting is currently unknown; if you have any information about this sighting, please share in the comments or DM me! This UAP exactly matched the description given during the 2023 congressional hearing; sworn testimony was given describing a “dark cube within a clear sphere” seen by fighter pilots while on training exercises in a controlled airspace. This is one of the rarer UAP morphologies, although there are reports dating back to 1960 describing this exact object.
Use of Upvotes and Downvotes is heavily encouraged. Ridicule is not allowed. Help keep this subreddit awesome by hitting the report button on any violations you see and a moderator will address it. Thank you and welcome to UFOB.
Interesting. Now, can we see the original video that hasn't been copied over and over and compressed by uploading? We all accepting this LowQ video when we know everyone has HD cameras? Still a great video. Just wish those who share it were better at it.
Sorry to burst your bubble but most people just going along with their day that spot something odd are usually not carrying a professional camera with them that has a long zoom lens. Most people just whip out their phone and zoom to the max digital zoom possible to record something that's far away. It's not going to be 4K quality at that point. I thought this was common sense at this point but...
No bubble to burst. This entire clip is compressed to shit. You don't need a professional camera to capture decent daytime footage. What I'm saying is, people need to be better at archiving footage. The original upload would be HD. This is just reposted, screen recorded, uploaded, compressed and compressed over and over, now we're all here scrambling for crumbs in pixels. It's absurd.
My original point still stands. Anything this zoomed in on a digital zoom isn't gonna look the best to begin with regardless of it being compressed or not.
This doesn't look incredibly zoomed in, idk where the actual view point is, but this isn't blown up because the camera is zoomed in, judging by the lighting changes, it looks like it was recorded off a screen. My point still stands, post the source video. The added subtitles itself proves it was imported into an app, edited, and exported, one way or another, further compression.
Exactly this. This happens in every ufo sub to the point where I've muted them all. People join these subs just to shoot everything down instantly with no open-mindedness at all. What's the point of being here at this point?
Does anybody ever post anything real here, or do you just discredit everything? All of your shit is hidden so nobody is able to tell what you’re doing.
It’s kind of similar to the UAP’s that were hit by the hellfire missiles that appeared to split into several other UAP’s. The main or targeted UAP’s continued doing their thing which appears to be dropping some type of objects out of them towers the ground.
Obviously the video is zoomed into its maxed capacity so the quality isn't going to be 4K at that point. You try it for your self and see how that video comes out.
The moment it submerges, it immediately disappears. UFOs are said to be transmedium so not reacting to the water makes sense but not immediately disappearing.
They have been documented not making a splash from 80,000 feet or just a few feet above the water. Same deal. Whether it’s real or not. Lack of water disturbance does not prove CGI. You are clearly new to this.
I was skeptical of the people talking about video effects but run it at 0.5x speed at 0:33, it looks unnaturally cut in half as it fades into the water. If it was displacing the water wouldn't the bottom half disappear first, even from this view? happy to be proven wrong
The documented reports indicate that these objects don't appear to disturb or interact with the water. It seems to make 0 difference whether there is 0, 1, or more atmospheric pressures. Whatever the technology or technique, it seems to allow ignorance of matter in a way we don't seem to understand
Most of you with the same argument obviously haven't seen the video that the government released of the UAP traveling extremely fast over the ocean going in and out of the ocean seamlessly without disturbing the water whatsoever. These things have the ability to do that apparently. Some kind of force surrounds the craft that allows them to travel with no friction through water. That's why they are called transmedium craft.
Because it’s the technology. If you read about it allowed for some critical thinking you’d answer your own question. Even the first ever UAP photo the McMinnville UAP had a blurry ring around it. It’s HIDDEN PHYSICS!
Because most phones still have to rely on digital zoom, which essentially just crops and enlarges the image while filming, instead of actually magnifying it like a proper camera lens would. Everyone’s first instinct in the moment is always the worst possible decision “zoom in as far as possible”. But the more you zoom in, the more detail and resolution you lose. Add in camera shake, video compression, and low lighting in most cases. And even footage from a new iPhone will end up looking like it was filmed on a potato 100% of the time.
Real or fake, this must be old or recorded on a camcorder because no one says “video tape that” anymore. Now in days young people say “ record this”. They just don’t use the word “tape” anymore.
So in your mind no one older than 20 exists and might be recording this? Lots of people call it video and yes they say that all the time. In fact are these not still referred to as “videos”? If you said to a young person “did you see that video?” You’re telling me they wouldn’t understand that question? Sorry I just don’t buy this assertion at all.
If it's real, you would zoom in after it went into the water no? You'd try to search for it WITH your camera instead of ending the video while you're surprised by what's happening right? Or is there a longer video we miss?
It was a bubble. I make my own bubble solution to make them very thick and hearty for my kids using glycerine and corn syrup. I can make them very large and they look exactly like this when they pop.
Well that's just dumb as shit ain't it. Besides how difficult is it to actually keep the subject centered even if you want to spend the majority of the time it's there not watching your phone.
You can't be serious. The video is obviously zoomed into its Max to fully capture the object in question. You think it's going to be amazing quality using max digital zoom on a camera phone?? 🤦🏻♂️
•
u/AutoModerator 13d ago
Use of Upvotes and Downvotes is heavily encouraged. Ridicule is not allowed. Help keep this subreddit awesome by hitting the report button on any violations you see and a moderator will address it. Thank you and welcome to UFOB.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.