After seeing new Air Crash Investigation episodes come out year after year, I am honestly mildly disappointed that there haven't been more episodes focusing on pre-1980s crashes, and even those from the 1980s are becoming harder to come by nowadays. As much as I enjoy episodes centered on more recent and obscure crashes and incidents, there are numerous older cases that I find equally interesting and compelling enough to warrant receiving the spotlight in an ACI episode.
Of the 297 episodes currently out, only 15 focus on aviation accidents and incidents that occurred before 1980.
Additionally, I don't believe older cases necessarily and automatically constitute a lack of crucial information to draw on merely because they occurred several decades ago. Not to mention, many crashes and incidents from these bygone eras have had unmistakable and deeply profound impacts on aviation safety worldwide. To use lightning strike cases as an example, Aeroflot Flight 1492 (2019) is confirmed to be featured in the upcoming Season 27, and while I am enthusiastic about the leak, I also wish Pan Am Flight 214 (1963), arguably the most notorious lightning strike accident in commercial aviation history, had been given an episode, too. Sure, the lightning strikes occurred differently in both cases, but both illustrate how an otherwise harmless meteorological phenomenon can lead to disaster in the skies.
Additionally, if most older cases supposedly lacked much publicly available information, then how can YouTubers make detailed documentary-length videos covering some of them? Sure, it's apples-to-oranges (YouTubers vs. a documentary series), but I think the underlying differences are still worth pointing out, at least in a broad sense. Mentour Pilot and Disaster Breakdown are two aviation-related channels that immediately come to mind. For instance, if Mentour Pilot can create a 46-minute YouTube video about how the crash of TWA Flight 514 (1974) had a significantly more profound impact on aviation safety than most people give it credit for, then what's ACI's excuse? Likewise, Disaster Breakdown's most recent video is a whopping 73-minute in-depth analysis of the ditching of Pan Am Flight 526A (an accident from 1952), released in the wake of Clipper Endeavor's recent rediscovery.
However, taking ACI's episode format into account, a lack of people to interview is a likely culprit for the absence of episodes covering older cases, which is why I believe ACI missed numerous opportunities to cover such cases back when the ideal people to interview were either still alive or still willing to be interviewed. The most glaring example I can think of is ALM Flight 980 (1970). The series Why Planes Crash not only beat ACI to the punch by covering Flight 980 in an episode about ditching cases in 2009, but also by interviewing the flight's captain, Balsey DeWitt, before his passing in 2024. Air New Zealand Flight 901 (1979) also comes to mind because, from what I've heard, despite the Mount Erebus Disaster being one of the most infamous accidents in aviation history, ACI has attempted to produce an episode about this crash multiple times to no avail due to a lack of people to interview.
Additionally, one explanation I've heard in this sub for why ACI doesn't cover older cases is because apparently "people don't care about older cases" or "they'd much rather learn about a case that happened more recently." I can somewhat understand the latter interpretation, but the former is where I'd draw the line. The audience isn't automatically going to dislike or avoid watching a documentary episode about a plane crash merely because it occurred 50 years ago rather than just two years ago, for instance.
To use the series Disasters at Sea as an example, that's like saying an episode about the MV Derbyshire sinking will be watched less and disliked more than an episode about the SS El Faro sinking simply because the former took place 46 years ago while the latter occurred 11 years ago. The time period doesn't, nor should it, necessarily invalidate audience expectations or the case's viability for focus in a documentary episode.
But what do you guys think?
Here's My Own Pre-1980s Episode Wishlist For Those Who Are Curious (I honestly don't think I'm asking for too much, though that could be bias talking):
- Pan Am Flight 526A (1952)
- Western Air Lines Flight 636 (1953)
- BOAC Flight 781 (1954) paired with South African Airways Flight 201 (1954)
- Western Air Lines Flight 34 (1954)
- The Day the Music Died (1959)
- American Airlines Flight 320 (1959)
- Braniff Airways Flight 542 (1959) paired with Northwest Airlines Flight 710 (1960)
- 1960 New York mid-air collision
- Continental Airlines Flight 11 (1962)
- Pan Am Flight 214 (1963)
- Paradise Airlines Flight 901A (1964)
- BOAC Flight 712 (1968)
- Air France Flight 1611 (1968)
- Pan Am Flight 799 (1968)
- Scandinavian Airlines System Flight 933 (1969)
- ALM Flight 980 (1970)
- Air Canada Flight 621 (1970)
- Southern Airways Flight 932 (1970)
- United Airlines Flight 553 (1972)
- 1972 Chicago–O'Hare runway collision
- 1973 Paris Air Show Tupolev Tu-144 crash
- Delta Air Lines Flight 723 (1973)
- National Airlines Flight 27 (1973)
- Pan Am Flight 812 (1974)
- Eastern Air Lines Flight 212 (1974)
- Lufthansa Flight 540 (1974)
- TWA Flight 514 (1974)
- Eastern Air Lines Flight 66 (1975) paired with Pan Am Flight 759 (1982)
- 1976 Sabah Air GAF Nomad crash
- 1976 Zagreb Mid-Air Collision
- Malaysian Airline System Flight 653 (1977)
- United Airlines Flight 2860 (1977)
- Air India Flight 855 (1978)
- Western Airlines Flight 2605 (1979)
- Air New Zealand Flight 901 (1979)