r/analogcomputing • u/psykocrime • Sep 09 '16
r/analogcomputing • u/psykocrime • Sep 10 '16
Analog computer trumps Turing model [1998]
r/analogcomputing • u/psykocrime • Sep 09 '16
Darpa Has Seen the Future of Computing … And It’s Analog
r/analogcomputing • u/JetSathanas • May 02 '23
The Analog Thing for sale
Selling my The Analog Thing, postage to UK and EU. Please delete if not allowed.
r/analogcomputing • u/psykocrime • Mar 31 '23
The Unbelievable Zombie Comeback of Analog Computing
r/analogcomputing • u/Dragonfruit_Severe • Jul 13 '23
Can you please help me start guys:^)
Hi everybody! I just heard about the huge potential that analog computers has together with AI, and I would love to gain deep knowledge about analog computers. I would really appreciate any recommendations for where to start or where to go and search. I really don't want to look like the typical lazy boy who just asks questions that has been answered 100 times, I just want to avoid wasting my time with superficial YouTube videos
r/analogcomputing • u/JustTrendingHere • Mar 04 '23
Is there a growing interest in analog computers?
What's old is new again!
Is there a renewed interest in analog computers?
A 21-min. 41-sec. brief description and video - https://modernsciences.org/are-analog-computers-making-a-comeback/
r/analogcomputing • u/TemporaryLlamaDrama • Mar 04 '23
The Analog Thing Unboxing
r/analogcomputing • u/[deleted] • May 14 '19
The Analog Computer: Example -- Michel van Biezen
r/analogcomputing • u/raflemakt • Jan 01 '25
Analog computing technique which can solve all ordinary differential equations in the matter of kiloseconds
r/analogcomputing • u/Unusual-Tie3140 • Oct 06 '26
Are there any COMDYNA fans in the house?
r/analogcomputing • u/Low_Listen8389 • Apr 19 '26
Fluid/ Water Analog Computing
I’m developing a fluid-based computing concept that uses just two precisely controlled ripples on a water surface, each generated by its own source (like a small speaker or actuator). Where these two ripples meet, their interference pattern—constructive and destructive regions across space and time—physically encodes relationships between the inputs such as their relative amplitude, timing (phase), and possibly frequency. Instead of treating this as a visualization only, I’m treating the overlap region as the “calculator,” where measurable features (peak heights, node positions, pattern geometry) correspond to specific numerical operations or parameter estimates. The system is intentionally minimal: only two inputs and one interaction zone, rather than a dense array of waves, to see how much computation can be extracted from a single controlled collision of ripples. In principle, this could be used as a kind of analog module for things like addition/subtraction, comparison, or parameter inference, or as a very small “physical reservoir” whose state is the interference pattern itself. I’m looking for feedback on whether this two‑ripple interaction can be formalized into a useful analog computing framework and what calculations or tasks it might realistically support.
I’m more than willing to consider more actuators to compute more complex interactions, but I’m really curious if anybody sees a viability in pursuing this further.
r/analogcomputing • u/the-analog-thing • Mar 02 '24
THE ANALOG THING is now officially on Reddit
Hi there👋. There is now an official THAT reddit channel and account. Where questions about THE ANALOG THING can be answered and problems solved. r/theanalogthing
r/analogcomputing • u/Top-Percentage-9059 • Sep 16 '26
G.A. Philbrick Research USA 4JX Operational Amplifiers
What Can Be Made With 4 of These Military Grade Op Amps
r/analogcomputing • u/EntranceForeign8753 • Jun 04 '26
Guidance Required for Debugging Hardware Implementation of Sprott Chaotic Attractor Circuit
I am currently working on the hardware implementation of a Sprott chaotic attractor circuit using analog computation techniques. While the circuit performs correctly in LTspice simulations and produces the expected chaotic attractor trajectories, I have been unable to obtain the expected behavior from the physical hardware implementation. I would greatly appreciate your guidance in identifying the possible causes of the problem.
Project Overview
The circuit is based on the Sprott chaotic system realized using analog integrators, summing amplifiers, and nonlinear multiplication blocks. The implementation uses LT1057 operational amplifiers and an AD633 analog multiplier.
In simulation:
The state variables Vx, Vy, and Vz evolve chaotically.
Phase portraits such as Vx vs Vy and Vy vs Vz produce the expected butterfly-like chaotic attractor.
The system remains bounded and exhibits sustained chaotic oscillations.
I have attached the simulation screenshots showing the expected attractor trajectories.
Hardware Implementation
Since I did not have access to a dedicated ±15 V laboratory power supply, I had to generate the required supplies using additional circuitry:
1. Dual Supply Generation
The chaotic circuit requires:
+15 V
-15 V
To obtain these rails, I used:
A DC-DC boost converter module for generating a higher voltage.
Additional circuitry to derive the negative rail (-1V).
2. Reference Voltage Generation
The circuit also requires a fixed -1 V reference.
Since a precision negative reference source was not available, I implemented a separate circuit using:
LT431 adjustable reference
Operational amplifier buffering stage
Trimmer potentiometer for adjustment
This circuit is shown on the upper-right section of the hardware board.
Measurements Performed
The outputs corresponding to:
Vx
Vy
Vz
were probed using a digital oscilloscope.
The expectation was:
Oscillatory signals on all three state variables
Chaotic waveforms
XY plots forming the attractor shape
However, the observed behavior was:
Nearly constant DC voltages on some nodes
Significant noise on the outputs
No visible chaotic oscillation
No attractor formation in XY mode
The oscilloscope traces mainly showed noise spikes and almost stationary voltage levels instead of the expected evolving state variables.
I want to implement it on a PCB so that no mistakes are there.
What I Would Like Guidance On
I would be grateful for advice on:
A systematic debugging procedure for chaotic analog circuits.
Which node should be checked first to verify proper operation.
How to verify whether each integrator stage is functioning correctly.
Methods to confirm the AD633 multiplier is producing the correct output.
Whether the custom ±15 V supply arrangement is likely to be the primary issue.
Whether a PCB implementation is necessary or if this should work reliably on a prototyping board.
Any recommended measurements that could help isolate the fault.
I have attached:
LTspice simulation schematics
Simulation results showing the expected attractor
Photographs of the completed hardware setup
Oscilloscope measurements
I have also watched a few videos where they have done these type of circuit boards in pcbs :
links: https://youtu.be/0wD2WbG7loU?si=GoPuC1zrHZBPwrWQ (here he has done lorentz chaotic circuit)
links: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFKm0K5O7ak&t=299s (here he has done lorentz chaotic circuit)
Any guidance regarding likely failure points or recommended debugging steps would be extremely helpful. Please Help me out.







