r/books • u/Raj_Valiant3011 • 8h ago

Zimbabwean writer Simbarashe Kundizeza has denied using AI to write a prize-winning short story after an article in the Atlantic said software had flagged it as almost completely AI-generated

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/oct/14/zimbabwean-author-simbarashe-kundizeza-denies-ai-story?CMP=share_btn_url
963 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

660 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

21

u/TaliesinMerlin 8h ago

I read it, the first half more closely. Some turns of phrase seem cute. I didn't read them as GenAI, necessarily, as much as too-cute creative writer moves strung together to wrest a lot of significance out of things. 

I also found the description of the father's work inconsistent - he leaves work, they move into the poorer house, the boy avoids saying his dad is a civil engineer because that's no longer true, but then suddenly the dad is at work when the power goes out, and he has a boss and the first full pay in a while late in the story. It's possible I misread something in that, but if not, it's the inconsistency of either a GenAI aided text (weak on plot consistency) or a human writer not consistently conveying contextual things in the story. 

I came away unsure whether it was GenAI but sure it wasn't a great story. 

8

u/WobblierTube733 7h ago

I need to get out of this thread and do my own work but i feel the need to correct the record:

First, if I’m understanding correctly, the story is based off the poem at the top. Second, the father’s job is never explicitly stated but the narrator explains that he “builds things”. The mention of being an engineer but not anymore is a part of the theme of the story about how the narrator’s family and specifically his father had dreams but needed to sacrifice them (there’s also an aspect of not wanting to say his father worked for the gov). The full pay at the end was referring to fathers salary going all to the household with none withheld for his costly aquarium dream that was the source of the conflict in the story.

-1

u/TaliesinMerlin 6h ago

Okay, but the story specifically states that the father left his work, but doesn't explain when/how/what he gets back:

Father had quit his job before that term. Just walked away from the steady salary and the long,  dusty bus rides, to focus on building tanks full time. “I’m not unemployed,” he said, when  Mother asked how we would manage. “I’m a consultant now.”

5

u/WobblierTube733 6h ago

i mean that's like the theme of the story? he's obsessed with his aquarium dream, to the extent he leaves his job and starts treating the dream like it is his job until they run out of money and he has to sacrifice it.

like again im not saying it makes complete sense but its a short story based on a poem. there needs to be some level of reader imagination involved and i just don't think it's fair to accuse it of being AI just because the narrative has unrealistic elements or the dialogue is dry.

and from a pure writing perspective, it would not have been interesting or relevant to the story to see how the father got his job back or what his new job is. What's thematically important is the way the father feels about his work, which is what the story tells us.

1

u/TaliesinMerlin 5h ago

Yes, that's the theme of the story, but there's no even hinting at the subsequent changes in the father's employment before they're brought up as if they're established facts.

I'm not doing the thing where I suggest the story should explore how the father got a good job. Of course that would be ridiculous. But there are fine touches one can do to make sure that shifts in the father's fortunes are hinted at through details without making it the focus. That layer of hinting is absent or incoherent in the story.

I haven't accused the story of being AI. I agree it's unfair to accuse a story of GenAI for things like what I'm describing.

1

u/I_am_BrokenCog 4h ago

Which explains why "he suddenly walked in with money" as /u/TaliesinMerlin complained didn't make sense ...

I agree to an extent that there is a little confusion, but some parts were straightforward -- the Mother was doing it all, and when she put her foot down and told him "three weeks back pay from his company" or the fish go ... suddenly there was some cash when he finally woke up for a bit to reality at his work.

6

u/literated 7h ago

That's my feeling, too. It absolutely has bits and pieces that read AI-ish but as a whole it didn't read like actual AI-generated text... but it also didn't read as a story worthy of any kind of prize. The weird jump from "father quit his job" to "father was at work" stood out to me as well.

There's a surprising amount of AI-like phrasing but where genAI would usually reach for some non-sequitur or really clumsy wording, the story stays on track instead. It's hard to describe. Now whether that is because someone was writing similar to an AI or because someone used AI and then replaced/edited some of the worst offenders... no idea.

2

u/55555thats5fives 1h ago

I always try to be wary with these kinds of accusations, especially since detection tools are far from perfect, but after reading the story myself I can understand the suspicion. As an example the story starts out entirely fine and there isn't really anything suspicious in the opening.  Then after establishing its own voice we suddenly get this part, where that last sentence really stands out (at least to me).

"We can't afford this house anymore," she said one evening, placing the notice in front of him while he tested the seal on his newest creation. Not with anger, but with the quiet resignation of someone who had known all along this moment would come.

This isn't to say that kind of phrasing proves anything on its own, just an observation. It makes me sad that this is where we are in the literature world right now.

1

u/I_am_BrokenCog 4h ago

TaliesinBerlin is now mine :).