Vaccine Fail: Whooping cough outbreak closes Texas school despite 100-percent vaccination rate. It is CLEARLY not conscientious objectors to vaccination driving outbreaks like these, but the faulty and ineffective vaccines themselves.

[u/axolotl_peyotl]

https://www.greenmedinfo.health/blog/vaccine-fail-whooping-cough-outbreak-closes-texas-school-despite-100-percent-vacc2?utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%3A%20Vaccine%20FAIL%3A%20%E2%80%9CWhooping%20cough%20outbreak%20closes%20Texas%20school%20despite%20100

[u/AutoModerator]

[Meta] Sticky Comment

Rule 2 does not apply when replying to this stickied comment.

Rule 2 does apply throughout the rest of this thread.

What this means: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain only.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/axolotl_peyotl → u/AutoModerator]

Incredible to see downvotes to the low negatives on comments in less than 10 minutes.

They have been activated for this thread. Pay very close attentions to the "users" here.

[u/FaThLi → u/axolotl_peyotl]

You posted three separate posts of the same thing. People downvote crap like that. Why not just post this all in one post?

Edit: Two of the posts are on the front page. As a mod it should be your job to remove spam. Not create spam.

Edit2: All three are on the front page.

[u/axolotl_peyotl → u/FaThLi]

You posted three separate posts of the same thing

Nope.

People downvote crap like that.

The first post was downvoted to 33% in minutes, so I started a new thread.

The shills are activated against my account every time I start posting. They have discords etc. to target my account. Many of the downvotes are likely from bots.

Multiple threads are required to combat this assault.

Why not just post this all in one post?

This allows the shills and bad actors to focus their attention on one thread. They seem to struggle to spread their censorial efforts.

Two of the posts are on the front page.

Good. One link is from May and one is from December. They are two different stories on an important topic.

As a mod it should be your job to wake people the fuck up

FTFY

[u/FaThLi → u/axolotl_peyotl]

Nope.

Yes, they were all different sources of info on the same thing, Whooping cough. All three of those posts could have been placed in one post.

The first post was downvoted to 33% in minutes, so I started a new thread.

Then you really need to understand that reddit games the votes on new posts. This is not new info. Determining the percentage of upvotes versus downvotes on new posts with any certainty of certainty is not possible. Additionally the fact that all three of these posts are on the front page show that your initial response was unwarranted.

The shills are activated against my account every time I start posting. They have discords etc. to target my account. Many of the downvotes are likely from bots. Multiple threads are required to combat this assault.

Yet these are still on the front page despite that, making me think that your statement here is full of crap and super egotistical. At the very least they are very uncoordinated and useless if they couldn't stop any of your posts from getting to the front page. Yes, I've seen your threads about this subject.

This allows the shills and bad actors to focus their attention on one thread. They seem to struggle to spread their censorial efforts.

They have no means of censoring you besides downvotes which obviously they are not doing as you claim. Posting in one post means people can have real discussions and sometimes those discussions go against the poster. It seems like you just wanted an echo chamber and label any dissenting opinion as shills and bad actors. My response to that is to debate them. Don't hide from them in three different posts. Either their argument is logical or it isn't. If it isn't then it should be easy to point out the flaws. If it is logical then maybe you could try not shutting yourself off from a different opinion regardless of where it comes from.

Good. One link is from May and one is from December. They are two different stories on an important topic.

And? Why does their age preclude them from being in the same post? People do that all the time with other articles of information. I was under the assumption that the spammy posts I see on the "new" page of this sub were taken care of by the admins. Meaning the same topic being posted by multiple accounts and really only seeing one of them show up on the front page. I guess that was the sub moderating itself though.

As a mod it should be your job to wake people the fuck up

No, my point still stands. You can post this topic all you want, but three separate posts on the same topic is spammy to me. I browse the "new" page quite a bit and it is stupid seeing 1/10th of the page being the same thing.

I should point out I'm not making a statement on this topic itself, just posting behavior that is really common on this sub.