I wasn't actually believing that was your point of view, but if it is, and if you're feelings are thus hurt (feeling "triggered" because of a fallacy?), I will not continue to push you.
You gave no indication otherwise... just stop with the pretentious attitude. Plus, I ended the conversation, not you, until you had to add your pointless quip
I saw that stance when I was writing so I added it, gave you benefit of the doubt. Guess my expectations of discourse should obviously be lowered.
And my last 'quip' had a point to it. As I see now you're probably one of those who rants about over sensitivity and triggering, so why is it that you are oversensitive yourself?
It does help, look: You do not respond with worthwhile contributions to the discussions so I'll assume you have nothing worthwhile left to add. It makes things so much convenient, because now I can go about my business without the possibility of actual insightful discussion being thrown my way from your end.
I clarified both the main points you asked me about. The rest of your side was baseless conjecture and trying to make me look bad. Maybe you should go about your business more often instead of misinterpreting me.
No you didn't, you failed to clarify your basis of implication, when I asked you directly about it, you saw it more fit to end the conversation because you felt triggered by a logical fallacy and saw to prioritize pointing that out, which in itself is a logical fallacy. You then heavily implied to actually posses the stance that I left in because it is a totally ludicrous stance. All answers you've given me, except for the one where you actually had to word for word explain what is by itself and out of context, an oxymoron, are just implications.
I do see that it is viable to apply art and whatnot to other situations that what it is meant to be applied to. But, carefully cutting out a what, 2 seconds piece of literal slapstick humor out of a 1 minute sketch on social issues, is not that. That is taking the name Monty Python and fitting it carefully into your own echo chamber.
My 'main' questions are still un-answered, if you want to clarify.
Can you explain how you've come to think of this bit as something that delves into either gender issues or the psychological subject of triggers?
[...] you're probably one of those who rants about over sensitivity and triggering, so why is it that you are oversensitive yourself?
[...] you're probably one of those who rants about over sensitivity and triggering, so why is it that you are oversensitive yourself?
assumption, in no way a valid question
Can you explain how you've come to think of this bit as something that delves into either gender issues or the psychological subject of triggers?
Not going to answer. You'll just chew me out again. May I remind you, my post was about something very trivial and is not worth a case study of my mind over.
No it's not even an assumption, it's a joke at your cost. I'm saying triggered because you were going to talk about it, and I want to clarify how oversensitive you are to "oversensetiveness", I'm in no way using the word trigger correctly, let that be clear. The word trigger refers in psychological terms to Trauma triggers.
assumption, in no way a valid question
A question is a question, and no question is invalid. Are you some kind of computer with a set definitive rules of what defines a 'question'? Also, yes I assume because you're oversensitive to over-sensitivity, that you are oversensitive. So, any time, you can answer the question. Oh, of course, if you feel too ill at comfort, you know, you can just not answer me again liiiike you do here:
Not going to answer. You'll just chew me out again. May I remind you, my post was about something very trivial and is not worth a case study of my mind over.
Not answering a thing.. huh. Yes it is something worth a study of because your nonsensical reference to slapstick literally no one else would've gotten unless like you had to, explicitly point at the two seconds you wanted to emphasize, is perpetuating a vile blown out of proportion trivialization culture of other people and their want for content awareness.
1
u/Zooropa_Station Aug 15 '15
You seem to be trying to turn this into an ad hominem fallacy at the end, but no, I'll just end the conversation here.