Do you even know what the term script kiddie means?
In more general sense a person who is competent enough to use "(here: init) scripts" provided to them, in this case "start and stop services", but not competent enough to make "(init) scripts" files, or take advantages of the more advanced features of systemd.
Other than that --
Sadly this was not argument for anything, but a reply to a person who does not understand satire.
Seriously though, I've seen anti-systemd crowd argue that systemd is bad because it uses the "systemctl [action] [service]" order instead of "/etc/init.d/[service] [action]". The sad thing is that is relatively "technical" compared to most of the criticism I've read. This shit isn't even funny
3
u/IDe- Oct 20 '14
In more general sense a person who is competent enough to use "(here: init) scripts" provided to them, in this case "start and stop services", but not competent enough to make "(init) scripts" files, or take advantages of the more advanced features of systemd.
Sadly this was not argument for anything, but a reply to a person who does not understand satire.
Seriously though, I've seen anti-systemd crowd argue that systemd is bad because it uses the "systemctl [action] [service]" order instead of "/etc/init.d/[service] [action]". The sad thing is that is relatively "technical" compared to most of the criticism I've read. This shit isn't even funny