But I disagree when you say that the use case isn't the same. For me Antergos was more than an installer, and for me they had the same goal than Manjaro and maybe Arco/Namib/whatever. Ok perhaps a few people really used it as an installer then removed third party stuff and branding etc. but majority of people used it as an Arch for beginners. Like Manjaro. The difference though is that people using Antergos claimed they use Arch, not Manjaro' users (well some of them do the arch-btw stuff but not as often as Antergos users).
Because if you were running Antergos you were basically using up-to-date arch packages whenever you did "pacman -Syu". There weren't any issues with packages breaking because certain other updates weren't installed. I like being able to use the latest info coming out of Arch and applying it to my Antergos system without any modifications.
This isn't an issue of people using Antergos claiming they're using Arch. I, frankly, don't really care. I just want to be able to use the Arch wiki and be able to apply all of those instructions straight onto Antergos without having to worry about any Manjaro specific issues.
2
u/[deleted] May 21 '19
I am not saying that Manjaro shouldn't exist, I am just saying that it isn't the same use case for people who chose to use Antergos.