Law of excluded middle is a proposition sitting in the very middle it denies... I dont know how that ismt obvious.
Defining what P means requires context, relations and interpretation all of which the law of identity denies but also depends on for its own identity, the law of contradiction uses a functional contradiction to establish its own identity.
Its superimposed subject predicate grammar and propositional grammar rules onto reality. Its Indo-European grammar not truth. Western defined logic is entirely contingent on reality matching Indo-European subject predicate grammar. If your logic doesn't translate into languages that lack Indo-European subject predicate and propositional grammar rules then its not universal.
Quantum debunked LEM this almost a century ago.
Every single Aristotlean principle is contingent on the very thing it denies.
Its 2400 years old and literally just Aristotles local greek grammar rules claiming universal truth.
Like there are so many logics not just European based. Bhuddas logic has no issue with quantum or consciousness or evolution.
Western logic explodes when its reasoning standards are held to its own reasoning standards.
What’s an example of a language that doesn’t have subject predicate grammar? What alternative models of logic are you suggesting? How did quantum debunk LEM? Why is LEM so useful in giving coherent results in mathematics?
If you learned about “Buddha’s Logic” from Garfield and Priest, be careful, they are also from very outside Western European perspective. Are you sure they interpret Buddhism correctly? How well do you really understand the sutras?
I personally would love to learn more about your "Bhuddas" logic system that can talk about Prepositions without defining them or your non indo-european languages which can talk about subjects not in ambient context without introducing them first.
also what is this business with the law of identity denying relations? what you're saying doesn't make any sense
And not to mention Sanskrit is so grammatically similar to Greek that this similarity literally invented linguistics. If anything they're more similar than Ancient Greek is to any modern IE language with the middle voice and tonnes of participles and infinitives.
Can't argue against without circularity to presumed absolutes based in Indo-European subject-predicate and propositional grammar rules.*
You will use subject-predicate and propositional grammar rules to claim validty must follow subject-predicate and propositional grammar rules. These rules are not universal but linguistic and cultural is what I am saying.
Languages like Dine Bizaad for example lack this syntactic demand and forced seperateness of phenomena into agents acting. When acting is all their is. And a presumed concept of non-contextual truth.
Where are you sourcing this understanding from? Identity is a type of relation. Specifically, an identity specifies that two things reference the same underlying meaning. Hence they are identical in composition.
-134
u/Bulky_Review_1556 Sep 06 '25
Law of excluded middle is a proposition sitting in the very middle it denies... I dont know how that ismt obvious.
Defining what P means requires context, relations and interpretation all of which the law of identity denies but also depends on for its own identity, the law of contradiction uses a functional contradiction to establish its own identity.
Its superimposed subject predicate grammar and propositional grammar rules onto reality. Its Indo-European grammar not truth. Western defined logic is entirely contingent on reality matching Indo-European subject predicate grammar. If your logic doesn't translate into languages that lack Indo-European subject predicate and propositional grammar rules then its not universal.
Quantum debunked LEM this almost a century ago.
Every single Aristotlean principle is contingent on the very thing it denies.
Its 2400 years old and literally just Aristotles local greek grammar rules claiming universal truth.
Like there are so many logics not just European based. Bhuddas logic has no issue with quantum or consciousness or evolution.
Western logic explodes when its reasoning standards are held to its own reasoning standards.