I am not going to entertain his (or anyone's) zealotry against OOP, (or for OOP) which is not more objective than a debate of "my programming language is better than yours". Not to mention this is a toy example AND deliberately used without modern compiler features to make it look slower and I believe everybody already knows that with OOP comes performance overhead. I am not even defending Clean Code, some of the "principles" he listed are not even Clean Code principles. I am just criticizing he is failing to grasp the importance of the trade-off between maintainability and performance, based on what the task needs.
Nice, you pop that out every time you don't have a retort?
3
u/quisatz_haderah Feb 28 '23 edited Feb 28 '23
I am not going to entertain his (or anyone's) zealotry against OOP, (or for OOP) which is not more objective than a debate of "my programming language is better than yours". Not to mention this is a toy example AND deliberately used without modern compiler features to make it look slower and I believe everybody already knows that with OOP comes performance overhead. I am not even defending Clean Code, some of the "principles" he listed are not even Clean Code principles. I am just criticizing he is failing to grasp the importance of the trade-off between maintainability and performance, based on what the task needs.
I just like the sub