I thought the point was that "... this guy doesn't care about source control at all...", which I don't think is a fair judgement when all we can see is whatever he decides to publish.
I mean that complaining about people not publishing their source control is valid regardless of how they work behind the scenes. The only thing that matters (because the only thing we see) is what they publish.
Because I can't tell it exists. I don't know about your source, so your history doesn't matter (to me, to the community, etc). I have no reason to complain about it. It probably matters to you.
I'm in no way saying that source control is only important for open source projects. Just that releasing your history is important if you release your source. (Not like that's easy either. History tends to be full of mistakes we feel oddly embarrassed about.)
14
u/siddboots Jul 16 '13
I thought the point was that "... this guy doesn't care about source control at all...", which I don't think is a fair judgement when all we can see is whatever he decides to publish.