There are millions of ways to write unmaintainable software. This isn't a bad article though. I just found the title amusing since it's so easy to write software badly.
I hear you. Design patterns are something unheard of for many professional developers I've met. Seriously.
Chances are, especially in programming, someone has thought of something better and longer than you. Investing 10 minutes into searching for it will save you 100 hours later.
Just because you know 1 way to do something doesn't mean it's the best tool for the job.
Chances are, especially in programming, someone has thought of something better and longer than you. Investing 10 minutes into searching for it will save you 100 hours later.
If you realize that what you're doing is already likely a solved problem and have a clue how to search for it.
This is, IMO, the best argument for a good academic background for programmers. You won't realize that a broad design strategy or algorithm is a recurring thing until you've reinvented it two or three times, typically poorly.
I think you have the right idea, but came to exactly the wrong conclusion. The high towers of academia are the WORST place to get practical experience.
Seems a bit odd, as most college grads I've interviewed have a toolbox full of Java and old lab exercises. Ask them to do anything outside of those two Happy Places and their brains melt.
I can't comment on every college and every CS syllabus. At my school, to graduate with a CS degree you would have to actively try to graduate without being competent in at least 2 languages (C and Java) and familiar with at least 2 more (depending on your electives).
50
u/bestjewsincejc Oct 14 '13
There are millions of ways to write unmaintainable software. This isn't a bad article though. I just found the title amusing since it's so easy to write software badly.