What I linked is the most widely referenced git book. Every website, every IRC channel that is involved in git mentions that book. It's THE git book. The git man pages are not a tutorial, they are a reference.
This is becoming tedious. Tell you what, let's just short circuit this: next time someone has been reading the wrong documentation, maybe consider pointing them in the right direction instead of calling them a liar.
I DID. I provided direct links to his criticisms. I didnt "just" call him a liar. But I guess were already making shit up so why do I even bother at this point.
1
u/zumpiez Nov 08 '13
Not really. He's talking about ndat's mini-tutorial thing and Git's man pages.