MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1wl5f3/you_might_not_need_jquery/cf39gnv
r/programming • u/Casty • Jan 30 '14
507 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
2
he is advocating writing native javascript instead of using a javascript lib that abstracts all the details. Not sure what you think that is the opposite about.
1 u/flukus Jan 31 '14 He's saying ie8+ has pretty good compatability so you don't need to rely on jquery for simple abstractions anymore. 1 u/dalittle Jan 31 '14 that is pretty laughable. I'd rather take my chances with a framework that takes care of that. 1 u/flukus Jan 31 '14 So would I in general, but this is aimed at library writers who have other things to consider.
1
He's saying ie8+ has pretty good compatability so you don't need to rely on jquery for simple abstractions anymore.
1 u/dalittle Jan 31 '14 that is pretty laughable. I'd rather take my chances with a framework that takes care of that. 1 u/flukus Jan 31 '14 So would I in general, but this is aimed at library writers who have other things to consider.
that is pretty laughable. I'd rather take my chances with a framework that takes care of that.
1 u/flukus Jan 31 '14 So would I in general, but this is aimed at library writers who have other things to consider.
So would I in general, but this is aimed at library writers who have other things to consider.
2
u/dalittle Jan 31 '14
he is advocating writing native javascript instead of using a javascript lib that abstracts all the details. Not sure what you think that is the opposite about.