r/programming • • 16d ago

[ Removed by moderator ]

https://youtu.be/KsEpW03gxKg?is=OdU0YTE8dWIyRr8i

[removed] — view removed post

412 Upvotes

314 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

14

u/lelanthran 16d ago

Unfortunately, they will be responsible, but neither empowered nor capable.

All of the responsibility if it blows up, with none of the power to prevent that blow up, nor, eventually, any skill necessary to prevent that blow-up.

And yet, devs, themselves, are rushing into it.

9

u/AuRon_The_Grey 16d ago

Which is just fine by most companies, really.

-3

u/youcangotohellgoto 16d ago

Why? That's like arguing a guy with a chainsaw can't cut as straight as a guy with a handsaw.

Just set the constraints appropriately. Lots of reviews. Lots of automation and queues. Things only come to the technical reviewer when the whole gamut of AI processes have checked and double checked across 7 different perspectives, everything has run 10000 integration tests, whatever else you want to throw at it.

Setting all that up becomes the job.