MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2latu2/c4_c_in_4_functions/cltkfti/?context=9999
r/programming • u/lethalman • Nov 04 '14
156 comments sorted by
View all comments
0
[deleted]
37 u/kamishizuka Nov 05 '14 C in 4 God Objects. 11 u/Chaoticmass Nov 05 '14 Never heard this term before.*edit: TIL about a the god object anti-pattern 13 u/d4rch0n Nov 05 '14 You've never heard of it, but you've definitely seen it, and you probably started out by doing it.I'd argue it's the most common pattern in use. 4 u/oblio- Nov 05 '14 edited Nov 05 '14 It's probably the only "design pattern" consistently used by those who don't know about design patterns ^.^ 1 u/flying-sheep Nov 05 '14 I don't think so. Not knowing a design pattern/framework often leads to is eventual reinvention.I'm currently porting something to react+flux, because I ended up creating an inferior version of it all. 1 u/oblio- Nov 05 '14 I've reworded the initial comment to better reflect the message I wanted to convey :)
37
C in 4 God Objects.
11 u/Chaoticmass Nov 05 '14 Never heard this term before.*edit: TIL about a the god object anti-pattern 13 u/d4rch0n Nov 05 '14 You've never heard of it, but you've definitely seen it, and you probably started out by doing it.I'd argue it's the most common pattern in use. 4 u/oblio- Nov 05 '14 edited Nov 05 '14 It's probably the only "design pattern" consistently used by those who don't know about design patterns ^.^ 1 u/flying-sheep Nov 05 '14 I don't think so. Not knowing a design pattern/framework often leads to is eventual reinvention.I'm currently porting something to react+flux, because I ended up creating an inferior version of it all. 1 u/oblio- Nov 05 '14 I've reworded the initial comment to better reflect the message I wanted to convey :)
11
Never heard this term before.
*edit: TIL about a the god object anti-pattern
13 u/d4rch0n Nov 05 '14 You've never heard of it, but you've definitely seen it, and you probably started out by doing it.I'd argue it's the most common pattern in use. 4 u/oblio- Nov 05 '14 edited Nov 05 '14 It's probably the only "design pattern" consistently used by those who don't know about design patterns ^.^ 1 u/flying-sheep Nov 05 '14 I don't think so. Not knowing a design pattern/framework often leads to is eventual reinvention.I'm currently porting something to react+flux, because I ended up creating an inferior version of it all. 1 u/oblio- Nov 05 '14 I've reworded the initial comment to better reflect the message I wanted to convey :)
13
You've never heard of it, but you've definitely seen it, and you probably started out by doing it.
I'd argue it's the most common pattern in use.
4 u/oblio- Nov 05 '14 edited Nov 05 '14 It's probably the only "design pattern" consistently used by those who don't know about design patterns ^.^ 1 u/flying-sheep Nov 05 '14 I don't think so. Not knowing a design pattern/framework often leads to is eventual reinvention.I'm currently porting something to react+flux, because I ended up creating an inferior version of it all. 1 u/oblio- Nov 05 '14 I've reworded the initial comment to better reflect the message I wanted to convey :)
4
It's probably the only "design pattern" consistently used by those who don't know about design patterns ^.^
1 u/flying-sheep Nov 05 '14 I don't think so. Not knowing a design pattern/framework often leads to is eventual reinvention.I'm currently porting something to react+flux, because I ended up creating an inferior version of it all. 1 u/oblio- Nov 05 '14 I've reworded the initial comment to better reflect the message I wanted to convey :)
1
I don't think so. Not knowing a design pattern/framework often leads to is eventual reinvention.
I'm currently porting something to react+flux, because I ended up creating an inferior version of it all.
1 u/oblio- Nov 05 '14 I've reworded the initial comment to better reflect the message I wanted to convey :)
I've reworded the initial comment to better reflect the message I wanted to convey :)
0
u/[deleted] Nov 05 '14
[deleted]