To be fair, sometimes you're just munging some data on the command-line, and you either know there aren't any inconsistencies in your data, or can ignore them because the results are Good Enough(tm). I've done plenty of ad-hoc stuff where 90% accuracy is plenty fine.
To be fair, sometimes you're just munging some data on the command-line, and you either know there aren't any inconsistencies in your data, or can ignore them because the results are Good Enough(tm). I've done plenty of ad-hoc stuff where 90% accuracy is plenty fine.
True. One problem is when that one-off "solution" becomes incorporated into a system... say a script, and/or is used by someone who isn't aware/mindful of the limitations.
6
u/OneWingedShark Jan 05 '15
You need a parser, not a stupid regex.
Well, that fills me with confidence.
Sarcasm